Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of methodological quality assessment scores

From: A Systematic review of the factors that affect soccer players’ short-passing ability—based on the Loughborough Soccer Passing Test

References

Impellizzeri et al. (2008) [24]

Zago et al. (2016) [25]

Cè et al. (2018) [26]

Tarakci, Pinar (2021) [27]

Eniseler et al. (2017) [28]

Özcan, Şahan (2018) [29]

Zois et al. (2013) [30]

Burcak (2015) [31]

Kaya et al. (2021) [32]

Cuong Le et al. (2023) [33]

Smith et al. (2016) [34]

Eligibility criteria

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

Random allocation

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

Allocation Concealment

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

Baseline Comparability

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Blind Participants

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Blind Therapist

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Blind Assessor

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Follow-up

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Intention to Treat Analysis

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Between Group Comparisons

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

Point Measure and Variability

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Total PEDro Score

7

6

6

4

6

6

6

4

6

3

8

References

Smith et al. (2017) [35]

Greco et al. (2017) [36]

Filipas et al. (2021) [37]

Bian et al. (2022) [18]

Lyons et al. (2006) [38]

Rampinini et al. (2008) [39]

Draganidis et al. (2013) [40]

Lyons et al. (2021) [41]

Ali et al. (2011) [42]

Owen et al. (2013) [43]

Ali et al. (2007) [44]

Eligibility criteria

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Random allocation

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

0

1

1

1

Allocation Concealment

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

0

1

1

1

Baseline Comparability

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

Blind Participants

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Blind Therapist

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Blind Assessor

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Follow-up

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Intention to Treat Analysis

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Between Group Comparisons

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Point Measure and Variability

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Total PEDro Score

7

6

7

6

4

4

6

3

6

6

6

References

Ali, William (2009) [45]

Foskett et al. (2009) [46]

Gant et al. (2010) [47]

O'Reilly, Wong (2013) [48]

Andrade-Souza et al. (2015) [49]

Shabir et al. (2019) [50]

Barte et al. (2019) [51]

Khalifa et al. (2020) [52]

O’Meagher et al. (2022) [53]

Vansteenkiste et al. (2022) [51]

Halabchi et al. (2017) [55]

Eligibility criteria

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Random allocation

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

Allocation Concealment

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

Baseline Comparability

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

Blind Participants

1

1

1

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

Blind Therapist

1

1

1

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

Blind Assessor

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Follow-up

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Intention to Treat Analysis

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Between Group Comparisons

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Point Measure and Variability

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Total PEDro Score

9

8

8

6

8

8

5

6

4

3

8