- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Treatment of chronic anterior shoulder dislocation by open reduction and simultaneous Bankart lesion repair
© Rouhani and Navali; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 26 February 2010
- Accepted: 16 June 2010
- Published: 16 June 2010
Untreated chronic shoulder dislocation eventually leads to functional disability and pain. Open reduction with different fixation methods have been introduced for most chronic shoulder dislocation. We hypothesized that open reduction and simultaneous Bankart lesion repair in chronic anterior shoulder dislocation obviates the need for joint fixation and leads to better results than previously reported methods.
Eight patients with chronic anterior dislocation of shoulder underwent open reduction and capsulolabral complex repair after an average delay of 10 weeks from injury. Early motion was allowed the day after surgery in the safe position and the clinical and radiographic results were analyzed at an average follow-up of one year.
The average Rowe and Zarin's score was 86 points. Four out of eight shoulders were graded as excellent, three as good and one as fair (Rowe and Zarins system). All patients were able to perform their daily activities and they had either mild or no pain. Anterior active forward flexion loss averaged 18 degrees, external active rotation loss averaged 17.5 degrees and internal active rotation loss averaged 3 vertebral body levels. Mild degenerative joint changes were noted in one patient.
The results show that the overall prognosis for this method of operation is more favorable than the previously reported methods and we recommend concomitant open reduction and capsulolabral complex repair for the treatment of old anterior shoulder dislocation.
Level of Evidence
Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group])
- Rotator Cuff
- External Rotation
- Shoulder Dislocation
- Subscapularis Tendon
- Posterior Dislocation
A glenohumeral joint that has remained dislocated for several days is called a chronic dislocation. These old dislocations most often are traumatic but frequently have been produced by a trivial injury as a result of the patient's increasing age and weakness and degeneration of the soft tissue about the shoulder joint such as the subscapularis and other rotator cuff tendons [1, 2]. In younger patients unreduced dislocations often occur in those with alcoholism, seizures, or multiple trauma . Usually the problems and complications of reduction are increased along with the chronicity of dislocation.
Open reduction and joint fixation has been suggested for most unreduced anterior dislocation of shoulder and different fixation methods have been used to prevent redislocation [4–6]. These fixation methods require long time immobilization and cause additional trauma to the articular surface of the humeral head and glenoid [4–6]. Little has been written on the results of these procedures.
Given the documented success following Bankart lesion repair in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation , we hypothesized that open reduction and simultaneous Bankart lesion repair of chronic anterior shoulder dislocation has the beneficial effect of safe early motion without the risk of redislocation.
Demographic data's of patients
Duration of dislocation (weeks)
Duration of follow up (months)
Patients' follow up was between 6 and 18 months with an average of 12 months. No patient was lost to follow up. The final functional results were rated at the time of the last follow up by the system proposed by Rowe and Zarins . This is a point system (total possible point is 100) based on the assessment of pain, motion and function. Final motion was recorded at the end of follow-up period and we reported the loss of ROM by comparison to contra lateral shoulder. In all patients CT scan was performed before and after surgery. Postoperative CT scan was used to determine whether anatomic glenohumeral reduction had been achieved.
The overall Rowe and Zarin's score averaged 86 points. Four out of eight shoulders were graded as excellent, three as good and one as fair. The mean forward flexion and external rotation losses were 18 and 17.5 degrees respectively and the internal rotation loss was three vertebral body levels. Anterior active elevation averaged 140 degrees, external rotation 40 degrees and internal active rotation to the level of the 9th thoracic body.
Results of treatment based on Rowe score and range of motion
External rotation loss(degree)
Internal rotation loss(vertebral body level)
Subluxation due to subscapularis rupture
All patients were able to do their daily activities with mild or no pain. CT scan showed anterior subluxation in two patients. One of these cases had anterior glenoid bone defect involving one third of the joint surface and fair result in Rowe system. The other subluxated case had subscapularis insufficiency at belly press test and good result at the end of follow-up period (Rowe system). These two patients were able to perform daily activities with mild pain. Mild degenerative changes were present in one patient at final radiographs. Two patients had proximal head migration in their follow-up radiographs. One of them had surgically documented massive rotator cuff tear which was irreparable.
In reviewing the literature there are few studies about the results of operative treatment of chronic anterior shoulder dislocation. Most authors have recommended allograft reconstruction or arthroplasty in large head defects following chronic shoulder dislocation. Gavriilidis stated that shoulder arthroplasty resulted in good midterm results for 12 patients with severe head involvement with benefits for range of motion, pain and patient satisfaction . The average duration of dislocation was 14 months in this report. In 13 patients with locked chronic posterior dislocation of shoulder and defect of between 25-50% of head, Diklic and coworkers reported good results with allograft reconstruction . In our series Hill-Sach's defect was less than 40% and all were non-engaging. We suppose the reason is that the mean duration of dislocation in our cases (10 weeks) was less than that of the mentioned reports.
Most reports have recommended shoulder joint transfixation to prevent redislocation following open reduction. Neviaser proposed transfixing the shoulder joint with a Swiss screw for three to four weeks . Wilson and Mckeever recommended acromiohumeral crossed transfixing pins to prevent recurrence of the dislocation5. Rockwood and Green also suggested using smooth pins through the head into the glenoid for ten to fourteen days . According to our study the results after capsulolabral complex repair appears to be more favorable than previously reported studies which have used metallic fixation methods. Postacchini et al reported good results in all four cases of operatively reduced chronic anterior and posterior dislocation . Goga have reported three excellent, five good and two fair results in ten operatively reduced anterior shoulder dislocation . Acromiohumeral k-wire fixation was used for 4 weeks in that group and the results were evaluated according to Rowe and Zarins system.
Supporting the arm at the side in a safe position was first stated by Rowe and Zarins in 1982 . They recommended simply maintaining the arm at the side anterior to the coronal plane of the body for anterior dislocations and posterior to the coronal plane for posterior dislocations. In a report of seven operatively treated chronic shoulder dislocation with a mean duration of dislocation of 12 weeks, they had no postoperative dislocation using this simple method. Two shoulders were graded as excellent, three as good and two as fair with the mean Rowe score of 78 points.
Our review of literature revealed just one report similar to our study. Mansat et al reported five patients with old anterior shoulder dislocation with average duration of 14 months . All were treated with open reduction and capsulolabral insertion. At the end of follow up the average Rowe score was 75 points. The duration of dislocation in this group of patients was more than our study and this may be the reason for low Rowe score comparing with our series.
Mild degenerative joint changes were noted in only one patient. Although in the literature there is no report for the true incidence of osteoarthritis after operative reduction of old dislocations, it appears that early osteoarthritis rate is reasonable in our study and we think that the reason may be early motion and not using transfixing implants.
The present study had some important limitations. Although the present study is one of the largest reports in the literature it is confined to only eight patients. Another potential source of uncertainty in this study arises from the duration of follow up period. Longer follow up is needed for the detection of the true incidence of degenerative changes following open reduction of old shoulder dislocations.
In conclusion the authors of this article recommend concomitant open reduction and capsulolabral complex repair, when possible, in the treatment of old anterior shoulder dislocations.
Consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and accompanying image.
- Bennett GE: Old dislocations of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg. 1936, 18: 594-606.Google Scholar
- Mirick MJ, Clinton JE, Ruiz E: External rotation method of shoulder dislocation reduction. J Am Coll Emerg Physisicians. 1979, 8: 528-31. 10.1016/S0361-1124(79)80302-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Engel T, Lill H, Korner J, Josten C: Bilatera fracture dislocation of shoulder caused by an epileptic seizure -diagnostic, treatment and result. Unfallchirurg. 1999, 102 (11): 897-901. 10.1007/s001130050499.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neviaser JS: Treatment of old unreduced dislocations of the shoulder. Surg Clinic North America. 1963, 43: 1671-1678.Google Scholar
- Wilson JC, McKeever FN: Traumatic posterior (retroglenoid) dislocation of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1949, 31 (A): 160-72.Google Scholar
- Rockwood C, Green DP: Fracture. 1975, Philadelphia:J.B Lippincott, 710-8.Google Scholar
- O'Hara BP, Urban JP: Influence of cyclic loading on the nutrition of articular cartilage. A MaroudasAnn Rheum Dis. 1990, 49: 536-539. 10.1136/ard.49.7.536.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rubak Jens, Poussa Mikko, Ritsilá Veijo: Effects of Joint Motion on the Repair of Articular Cartilage with Free Periosteal Grafts. 1982, 53 (2): 187-191.Google Scholar
- Bankart ASB: Recurrent or habitual dislocation of the shoulder joint. Br Med J. 1923, 1132-1133. 10.1136/bmj.2.3285.1132.Google Scholar
- Rowe CR, Zarins B: Chronic unreduced dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg. 1982, 64 (4): 494-505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diklic ID, Ganic ZD, Blagojevic ZD, Nho SJ, Romeo AA: Treatment of locked chronic posterior dislocation of the shoulder by reconstruction of the defect in the humeral head with an allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010, 92 (1): 71-6. 10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gavriilidis I, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P, Kircher J: Chronic locked posterior shoulder dislocation with severe head involvement. Int Orthop. 2010, 34 (1): 79-84. 10.1007/s00264-009-0762-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perniceni B, Augereau A: Treatment of old unreduced anterior dislocations of the shoulder by open reduction and reinforced rib graft: discussion of 3 cases. Ann Chir. 1983, 36: 235-9.Google Scholar
- Gosset J: Une technique de greffe coraco-glenordienne dans le traitement des luxations recidivantes de l'epoule. Mem Acad Chir. 1960, 86: 445-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Postacchini F, Facchini M: The treatment of unreduced dislocation of the shoulder. A review of 12 cases. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1987, 13 (1): 15-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goga IE: Chronic shoulder dislocation. J shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003, 12 (5): 446_50-10.1016/S1058-2746(03)00088-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mansat P, Guity MR, Mansat M, Bellumore Y, Rongieres M, Bonnevialle P: Chronic anterior shoulder dislocation treated by open reduction sparing the humeral head. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003, 89 (1): 19-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.