This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Painful knee joint after ACL reconstruction using biodegradable interference screws- SPECT/CT a valuable diagnostic tool? A case report
© Hirschmann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 9 June 2010
Accepted: 16 September 2010
Published: 16 September 2010
With the presented case we strive to introduce combined single photon emission computerized tomography and conventional computer tomography (SPECT/CT) as new diagnostic imaging modality and illustrate the possible clinical value in patients after ACL reconstruction. We report the case of a painful knee due to a foreign body reaction and delayed degradation of the biodegradable interference screws after ACL reconstruction. The MRI showed an intact ACL graft, a possible tibial cyclops lesion and a patella infera. There was no increased fluid collection within the bone tunnels. The 99mTc-HDP-SPECT/CT clearly identified a highly increased tracer uptake around and within the tibial and femoral tunnels and the patellofemoral joint. On 3D-CT out of the SPECT/CT data the femoral graft attachment was shallow (50% along the Blumensaat's line) and high in the notch. At revision arthroscopy a diffuse hypertrophy of the synovium, scarring of the Hoffa fat pad and a cyclops lesion of the former ACL graft was found. The interference screws were partially degraded and under palpation and pressure a grey fluid-like substance drained into the joint. The interference screws and the ACL graft were removed and an arthrolysis performed.
In the case presented it was most likely a combination of improper graft placement, delayed degradation of the interference screws and unknown biological factors. The too shallow and high ACL graft placement might have led to roof impingement, chronic intraarticular inflammation and hence the delayed degradation of the screws.
SPECT/CT has facilitated the establishment of diagnosis, process of decision making and further treatment in patients with knee pain after ACL reconstruction. From the combination of structural (tunnel position in 3D-CT) and metabolic information (tracer uptake in SPECT/CT) the patient's cause of the pain was established.
In the last decades interest among arthroscopic surgeons in using biodegradable interference screws has grown [1–12]. Biodegradable interference screws are either made from poly-lactid-acid-PLA or polyglycolide-PGA (e.g. poly-L-lactide acid (PLLA) or poly-DL-lactide acid (PDLLA)) alone or in composite with hydroxy-apatite and tricalcium-phosphate [1, 3, 5, 11, 13]. Offering similar fixation strength and outcome as metal interference screws these promise to cause less graft damage at insertion, less artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and generally no removal of the screws is necessary . However, the evidence on the use of biodegradable interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still scarce. Although the screws promise to degrade within approximately 12-24 months after surgery, several cases have been reported in which this did not happen [1, 10, 15].
Also a variety of other screw related problems such as screw breakage, intraarticular migration, allergic or foreign body reactions, arthrosynovitis, cyst and abscess formation, fibroxanthoma and tunnel enlargement have been reported [1, 10, 11, 13, 16–20].
In most orthopaedic units current diagnostic follow-up in patients having problems after ACL reconstruction include clinical examination, standardized radiographs, computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [21–23]. Clinical examination is often not specific enough and radiographs are only able to detect gross structural abnormalities, therefore these often fail to identify the origin of the patient's pain. MRI is a sensitive imaging modality, but it has been reported that persistence of biodegradable interference screws was seen although it already had been degraded . SPECT/CT combines the precise anatomical detail available with high spatial resolution CT and information on abnormal bone metabolism through single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) [24–28]. It promises the potential assessment of the biology of the joint and particularly the bone-graft-fixation complex .
To the best of our knowledge there is no case report or study in the literature concerning the use of SPECT/CT in patients with pain after ACL reconstruction. With the case described we strive to introduce SPECT/CT as new diagnostic imaging modality and illustrate the possible clinical value in patients after ACL reconstruction it may offer as new diagnostic radiologic modality.
A 29 year old woman sustained a valgus-hyperflexion injury of her left knee while skiing 2 years ago. An ACL intrasubstance tear and a radial lesion of the lateral meniscus were diagnosed and treated by an arthroscopically assisted single-bundle ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon- bone (BTB) autograft three months after injury. The graft was fixed within the femoral and tibial tunnel using PLGA/TCP interference screws (Milagro™, Depuy MITEK, Spreitenbach, Switzerland). The Milagro™ interference screw is made of 30% β-TCP (tricalcium phosphate) and 70% PLGA (polylactic-co-glycolic acid). In addition, a partial lateral meniscectomy was performed.
On the contralateral knee an ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft was performed 8 years before. At this time the graft was fixed within the tibial and femoral tunnels using sutures around post screws.
At revision arthroscopy a diffuse hypertrophy of the synovium, scarring of the Hoffa fat pad and a cyclops lesion of the former ACL graft was found causing graft to notch roof impingement in extension and a substantial flexion deficit. The interference screws were partially degraded and under palpation and pressure a grey fluid-like substance drained into the joint.
The most important finding of the present case was twofold:
Firstly, we reported the case of a painful knee due to a foreign body reaction and degradation under pressure after ACL graft fixation using biodegradable interference screws. According to Frosch et al. 18 months after ACL reconstruction one could expect that the used interference screws were entirely degraded and partially incorporated [1, 10, 15]. The authors investigated the in vivo degradation and biocompatibility of the same interference screw as in our case report. In a series of 12 patients after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon grafts serial MR imaging was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery [1, 10, 15]. At 12 months post-operatively the average volume loss of the tibial and femoral screws were 83 ± 17% and 92 ± 6%, respectively [1, 10, 15]. The screws were entirely degraded and only remants were identifiable [1, 10, 15]. In contrast, Ma et al. found no full degradation of PLLA interference screws at at 2-4 years after surgery in patients after hamstring ACL reconstruction . Fink et al. showed similar results with complete degradation at 12 months using CT scans on PGA screws 
Although the Milagro™ screw is considered to be biocompatible and osteoconductive the femoral and to a lesser degree the tibial screw in the presented case did not degrade and caused a foreign body reaction, which was confimed by histology. This is in line with others describing inflammatory or foreign body reactions after use of biodegradable screws [1, 7, 10, 13]. In which patients and under which condition and environment the degradation of this biodegradable interference screw causes a foreign body reaction and related arthrofibrosis remains unclear. A number of different factors such as the polymers and copolymers, the size of the screw, the position of the interference screw and the sterilization are considered to be key factors for the degradation of biodegradable screws . Also the angulation of the tunnel, location of tunnel entrance, the angle and depth of graft fixation and the joint metabolism might be of influence not only for the degradation process but also for the graft tension [21, 31, 32].
In the case presented it seems to be a combination of improper graft placement, delayed degradation of the used interference screws and biological factors, which could not be elucidated. The too shallow and high graft placement might have led to impingement and thus chronic intraarticular inflammation.
Secondly SPECT/CT may facilitate the establishment of diagnosis, process of decision making and further treatment in patients with knee pain after ACL reconstruction. Due to the combination of structural, functional and metabolic information the patient's cause of the pain was established [25, 26].
Marchant et al. investigated the intra- and inter-observer reliability in identifying bone tunnels and assessing tunnel widening on radiographs, MRI and CT . They showed that CT was most reliable. Radiographs and MRI were not reliable, even for simply identifying the presence of a bone tunnel . Without the use of SPECT/CT the decision to debride the ACL graft and remove the interference screws would have not been made.
Three dimensional reconstructions of CT provide the surgeon with a better 3D understanding of patient's anatomy . The position of the tunnels, the orientation of the graft and the localization of attachment area can be assessed, which have been reported to be decisive for outcome after ACL reconstruction [33, 34]. In the presented case 3D-CT out of the SPECT/CT data was used to accurately evaluate the tunnel placement in relation to standardized frames of reference.
Hogervorst et al. found that scintigraphic tracer uptake correlated significantly with tibial tunnel enlargement and location of the tibial tunnel . They concluded that bone scintigraphy is a reliable method assessing the complex biology of graft remodelling, tunnel enlargement and osseous homeostasis . In contrast to scintigraphy or SPECT alone SPECT/CT is able to accurately allocate the tracer uptake to anatomical areas (e.g. tibiofemoral or patellofemoral joint as well as tibial and femoral tunnels).
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.
- Frosch KH, Sawallich T, Schutze G, Losch A, Walde T, Balcarek P, Konietschke F, Sturmer KM: Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the bioabsorbable Milagro interference screw for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2009, 4 (2): 73-79. 10.1007/s11751-009-0063-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zheng N, Price CT, Indelicato PA, Gao B: Tibial fixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of bovine bone screw and biodegradable interference screw. Am J Sports Med. 2008, 36 (12): 2322-2327. 10.1177/0363546508322895.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kwak JH, Sim JA, Kim SH, Lee KC, Lee BK: Delayed intra-articular inflammatory reaction due to poly-L-lactide bioabsorbable interference screw used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008, 24 (2): 243-246. 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.11.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jarvela T, Moisala AS, Sihvonen R, Jarvela S, Kannus P, Jarvinen M: Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results. Am J Sports Med. 2008, 36 (2): 290-297. 10.1177/0363546507308360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herbenick M, Gambardella R: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a unique bioabsorbable interference screw for malpositioned tunnels. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2008, 37 (8): 425-428.Google Scholar
- Zantop T, Weimann A, Wolle K, Musahl V, Langer M, Petersen W: Initial and 6 weeks postoperative structural properties of soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with cross-pin or interference screw fixation: an in vivo study in sheep. Arthroscopy. 2007, 23 (1): 14-20. 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.10.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park MC, Tibone JE: False magnetic resonance imaging persistence of a biodegradable anterior cruciate ligament interference screw with chronic inflammation after 4 years in vivo. Arthroscopy. 2006, 22 (8): 911-e911-914.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanchis-Alfonso V, Tinto-Pedrerol M: Femoral interference screw divergence after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provoking severe anterior knee pain. Arthroscopy. 2004, 20 (5): 528-531. 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.03.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morgan CD, Gehrmann RM, Jayo MJ, Johnson CS: Histologic findings with a bioabsorbable anterior cruciate ligament interference screw explant after 2.5 years in vivo. Arthroscopy. 2002, 18 (9): E47-10.1053/jars.2002.36466.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinek V, Seil R, Lattermann C, Watkins SC, Fu FH: The fate of the poly-L-lactic acid interference screw after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2001, 17 (1): 73-76. 10.1053/jars.2001.7797.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fink C, Benedetto KP, Hackl W, Hoser C, Freund MC, Rieger M: Bioabsorbable polyglyconate interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective computed tomography-controlled study. Arthroscopy. 2000, 16 (5): 491-498. 10.1053/jars.2000.4633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marti C, Imhoff AB, Bahrs C, Romero J: Metallic versus bioabsorbable interference screw for fixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997, 5 (4): 217-221. 10.1007/s001670050053.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinek V, Friederich NF: Tibial and pretibial cyst formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy. 1999, 15 (3): 317-320. 10.1016/S0749-8063(99)70042-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zantop T, Weimann A, Schmidtko R, Herbort M, Raschke MJ, Petersen W: Graft laceration and pullout strength of soft-tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: in vitro study comparing titanium, poly-d,l-lactide, and poly-d,l-lactide-tricalcium phosphate screws. Arthroscopy. 2006, 22 (11): 1204-1210. 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.06.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Radford MJ, Noakes J, Read J, Wood DG: The natural history of a bioabsorbable interference screw used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a 4-strand hamstring technique. Arthroscopy. 2005, 21 (6): 707-710. 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.03.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stener S, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Rostgard-Christensen L, Kartus J: A Long-Term, Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Biodegradable and Metal Interference Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: Radiographic Results and Clinical Outcome. Am J Sports Med. 2010Google Scholar
- Shen C, Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY: Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 26 (5): 705-713. 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.011.Google Scholar
- Stockheim M, Most-Ehrlein S, Rothschenk HJ, Wirbel R: [Cartilage damage caused by a dislocated resorbable interference screw of poly(L-lactide) 46 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction]. Z Orthop Unfall. 148 (1): 44-48. 10.1055/s-0029-1240700.Google Scholar
- Baums MH, Zelle BA, Schultz W, Ernstberger T, Klinger HM: Intraarticular migration of a broken biodegradable interference screw after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006, 14 (9): 865-868. 10.1007/s00167-006-0049-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sassmannshausen G, Carr CF: Transcutaneous migration of a tibial bioabsorbable interference screw after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2003, 19 (9): E133-136. 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.09.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marchant MH, Willimon SC, Vinson E, Pietrobon R, Garrett WE, Higgins LD: Comparison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009, 18 (8): 1059-64. 10.1007/s00167-009-0952-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inoue M, Tokuyasu S, Kuwahara S, Yasojima N, Kasahara Y, Kondo E, Onodere S, Yasuda K: Tunnel location in transparent 3-dimensional CT in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the trans-tibial tunnel technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009, 18 (9): 1176-83. 10.1007/s00167-009-0989-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Webster KE, Feller JA, Elliott J, Hutchison A, Payne R: A comparison of bone tunnel measurements made using computed tomography and digital plain radiography after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2004, 20 (9): 946-950.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirschmann MT, Davda K, Iranpour F, Rasch H, Friederich NF: Combined single photon emission computerized tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) in patellofemoral disorders - a clinical review. Int Orthop. 2010.Google Scholar
- Hirschmann MT, Davda K, Rasch H, Arnold MP, Friederich NF: Clinical value of combined single photon emission computerized tomography and conventional computer tomography (SPECT/CT) in sports medicine. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010.Google Scholar
- Hirschmann MT, Iranpour F, Davda K, Rasch H, Hugli R, Friederich NF: Combined single-photon emission computerized tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT): clinical value for the knee surgeons?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010, 18 (3): 341-345. 10.1007/s00167-009-0879-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirschmann MT, Iranpour F, Konala P, Kerner A, Rasch H, Cobb JP, Friederich NF: A novel standardized algorithm for evaluating patients with painful total knee arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010, 18 (3): 939-944. 10.1007/s00167-010-1070-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Konala P, Iranpour F, Kerner A, Rasch H, Friederich NF, Hirschmann MT: Clinical benefit of SPECT/CT for follow-up of surgical treatment of osteochondritis dissecans. Ann Nucl Med. 2010.Google Scholar
- Amis AA, Jakob RP: Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998, 6 (Suppl 1): S2-12. 10.1007/s001670050215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma CB, Francis K, Towers J, Irrgang J, Fu FH, Harner CH: Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation. Arthroscopy. 2004, 20 (2): 122-128. 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahn JH, Lee SH, Yoo JC, Ha HC: Measurement of the graft angles for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial technique using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007, 15 (11): 1293-1300. 10.1007/s00167-007-0389-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arnold MP, Verdonschot N, van Kampen A: ACL graft can replicate the normal ligament's tension curve. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005, 13 (8): 625-631. 10.1007/s00167-004-0601-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomczak RJ, Hehl G, Mergo PJ, Merkle E, Rieber A, Brambs HJ: Tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MRI analysis as an important factor in the radiological report. Skeletal Radiol. 1997, 26 (7): 409-413. 10.1007/s002560050256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Behrend H, Stutz G, Kessler MA, Rukavina A, Giesinger K, Kuster MS: Tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: quality control in a teaching hospital. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006, 14 (11): 1159-1165. 10.1007/s00167-006-0186-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hogervorst T, van der Hart CP, Pels Rijcken TH, Taconis WK: Abnormal bone scans of the tibial tunnel 2 years after patella ligament anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: correlation with tunnel enlargement and tibial graft length. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000, 8 (6): 322-328. 10.1007/s001670000165.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.