Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effects of jump and balance training on knee kinematics and electromyography of female basketball athletes during a single limb drop landing: pre-post intervention study

  • Yasuharu Nagano1Email author,
  • Hirofumi Ida2,
  • Masami Akai3 and
  • Toru Fukubayashi4
Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & TechnologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted20113:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-3-14

Received: 23 July 2010

Accepted: 14 July 2011

Published: 14 July 2011

Abstract

Background

Some research studies have investigated the effects of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury prevention programs on knee kinematics during landing tasks; however the results were different among the studies. Even though tibial rotation is usually observed at the time of ACL injury, the effects of training programs for knee kinematics in the horizontal plane have not yet been analyzed. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a jump and balance training program on knee kinematics including tibial rotation as well as on electromyography of the quadriceps and hamstrings in female athletes.

Methods

Eight female basketball athletes participated in the experiment. All subjects performed a single limb landing at three different times: the initial test, five weeks later, and one week after completing training. The jump and balance training program lasted for five weeks. Knee kinematics and simultaneous electromyography of the rectus femoris and Hamstrings before training were compared with those measured after completing the training program.

Results

After training, regarding the position of the knee at foot contact, the knee flexion angle for the Post-training trial (mean (SE): 24.4 (2.1) deg) was significantly larger than that for the Pre-training trial (19.3 (2.5) deg) (p < 0.01). The absolute change during landing in knee flexion for the Post-training trial (40.2 (1.9) deg) was significantly larger than that for the Pre-training trial (34.3 (2.5) deg) (p < 0.001). Tibial rotation and the knee varus/valgus angle were not significantly different after training. A significant increase was also found in the activity of the hamstrings 50 ms before foot contact (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The jump and balance training program successfully increased knee flexion and hamstring activity of female athletes during landing, and has the possibility of producing partial effects to avoid the characteristic knee position observed in ACL injury, thereby preventing injury. However, the expected changes in frontal and transverse kinematics of the knee were not observed.

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury leads to knee joint instability [1] and failure to return to sports activities at the same level [2]. After ACL injury, rehabilitation can last for six months or longer before an athlete can return to sports activity [3]. Osteoarthritic changes can be found even when ACL reconstruction is performed [4]. Therefore in recent years, prevention of ACL injuries has become a key issue. Most ACL injury prevention training programs are composed of plyometrics, balance training, agility training, and instructions to avoid the characteristic stance that is slight knee flexion and forceful valgus rotation associated with ACL injury [510]. Although the subjects and details of the training programs are different, the results show a decrease in the incidence of ACL injury [59].

Some research studies have investigated the effects of training programs on knee kinematics during landing tasks; however the results were different among the studies [1114]. An increase in knee flexion has been reported as a result of conducting plyometric training [11], plyometric or balance training [12], and videotape feedback [13]. Only Myer et al. [12] reported changes in the kinematics of the knee in the frontal plane, i.e., both plyometric and balance training decreased the knee abduction angle during a medial drop landing. In other studies [11, 14], no differences in knee valgus were found after plyometric or agility training. Among all these studies, knee kinematics have only been analyzed in the sagittal and frontal plane. Even though tibial rotation is usually observed at the time of ACL injury, the effects of training programs for knee kinematics in the horizontal plane has not yet been analyzed.

Other research studies investigated the effects of training programs on electromyography during athletic tasks; however activation of mainly the hip-musculature has been reported [11, 15, 16]. DeMorat et al. [17] ascertained that aggressive quadriceps loading with the knee in slight flexion produces significant anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation and leads to ACL injury. Chappell et al. [18] reported that females tend to have greater quadriceps activation before landing than males. Pre-activation is thought to be important for the dynamic stability of the knee. Thus, it is necessary to evaluate the effects of ACL injury prevention training programs on the electromyography of the quadriceps and hamstrings of female athletes including pre-activation.

Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a jump and balance training program on knee kinematics including tibial rotation as well as on electromyography of the quadriceps and hamstrings in female athletes. Since the training program aims at reducing ACL injury, subjects were instructed to avoid landing with their body in the characteristic position of ACL injury, which includes slight knee flexion and valgus rotation with either internal or external tibial rotation [1921]. Furthermore, for the training program to be successful, hamstrings activation should increase to counteract against aggressive quadriceps loading. Therefore, our hypothesis was that training will increase knee flexion angle, decrease knee valgus, decrease internal tibial rotation, and increase hamstrings activation before ground contact during a single limb landing.

Methods

Population

Eight female basketball athletes belonging to Waseda University basketball team participated in this study. Exclusion criteria included any lower extremity reconstructive surgery in the past two years or unresolved musculoskeletal disorders that prohibited subjects from participating in sports. The average age of the subjects was 19.4 (0.7) yrs (Mean (SD)), the average height was 1.70 (0.05) m, the average weight was 64.1 (7.8) kg and the average BMI was 22.2 (1.6). Prior to participation, each subject signed a Human Subjects Informed Consent Document approved by Waseda University ethics committee.

Experimental Task

All subjects performed a single limb drop landing from a 30 cm platform as described in a previous study [22]. The subjects were instructed to put their hands on their lower torso, stand on their right foot, and jump 30 cm away from the platform. The subjects were to land on their right foot in a neutral position. Upon landing, each subject was instructed to place their center of mass as far forward as possible in an attempt to limit horizontal motion and land without jumping up. Throughout the experiment, the subjects were barefooted to exclude the influence of differences in their shoes. Subjects were allowed several preparation trials until they could conduct the experimental task precisely. Measurement was continued until three successful trials were accomplished consecutively. We defined a failed trial when the subjects (1) could not maintain a single limb landing position, (2) landed farther than or within 30 cm of the platform, or (3) jumped up from the platform. Subjects took a sufficient rest period between the trials to avoid the effects of fatigue. The experimental task was performed three times: the initial test (Pre-training 1), five weeks later (Pre-training 2), and one week after completing training (Post-training). The training program began two weeks after the second experimental task and lasted for five weeks.

Data Collection

All experiments took place at the National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities in Saitama, Japan. A seven camera VICON 370 motion analysis system (Oxford Metrics Ink., Oxford, UK) was used to record the 3-D movements of the lower limb. The laboratory was equipped with 2 force plates (9287A; Kistler Japan Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The motion and force data were recorded at 200 Hz and 1000 Hz, respectively.

For each subject, 24 markers of 9 mm diameter were secured to the lower limb using double-sided adhesive tape as described in a previous study [22]. The markers were used to implement the Point Cluster Technique (PCT) [23]. The PCT provides a minimally invasive estimation of the in vivo motion of the knee. By using a cluster system of skin markers on a limb segment, the PCT assumes to cancel out the noise resulted from skin deformation. We developed our algorithm of the PCT following the procedure described by Andriacchi et al. [23]. The knee kinematics, including knee flexion/extension, valgus/varus, and internal/external tibial rotation as well as the anterior/posterior tibial translation, were calculated using the joint coordinate system proposed by Grood and Suntay [24].

Simultaneous electromyographic activity of the rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF) and semimembranosus (SM) were measured. Pre-amplified surface Ag/AgCl electrodes sensors (DelSys, Inc., Boston, USA) were used to detect muscular activity. A single-ended amplifier (gain = 1000) was used, while the common mode rejection rate was -92 dB. Double-sided adhesive strips were used to adhere the electrodes to the subject's skin. Additionally surgical tape (NICHIBAN Co., Ltd. Tokyo, Japan) was placed over the electrodes as well as around the thigh and shank to retard movement of the electrodes on the skin that would cause movement artifacts. The surface electromyography (EMG) electrodes were placed at the midpoint between the top of the patella and the anterior superior iliac spine over the muscle belly of the RF as well as at a point located distally at one-third of the distance between the knee-joint space and the ischial tuberosity over the muscle bellies of the BF and the SM. A reference electrode was placed on the head of the fibula. The EMG data was recorded at 1000 Hz.

EMG data were recorded 1) while the subjects performed a maximum voluntary knee flexion and extension at 60 degrees of knee flexion against a resistance for three seconds, 2) during a static trial, i.e., while the subjects remained in a standing position for 1 second, and 3) while the subjects performed the single limb drop landing as previously described.

Training Program

Training lasted approximately 20 minutes a day, 3 days a week for 5 weeks. The program was developed based on a thorough review of the literature [6, 2527] (Table 1). Because the exisiting programs last for considerably long durations, this program was newly designed in order to decrease the training time to 20 minutes. During training, subjects practiced their fundamental basketball skills and additionally carried out jump and balance training to increase their landing skills. During the first three weeks of training, the technique phase (Phase1) which focused on improving the subject's landing technique was implemented. Three basic techniques were stressed: 1) a soft landing with a great bend to the hip, knee and ankle joint; 2) landing on the ball of the foot with the trunk leaning forward; 3) keeping the subject's knee neutral without medial motion. The last two weeks of training, the performance phase (Phase2), focused on increasing the intensity of training and on the use of proper techniques throughout several movements. A trainer or therapist attended the training every time and instructed the athletes to learn these landing techniques throughout each training session.
Table 1

Description of the exercises performed during the jump and balance training

Exercise

Time or Repetitions

Exercise

Time or Repetitions

Phase1: Technique

 

Phase2: Performance

 

1. Squat jumps

20 sec

1. Squat jumps

20 sec

2. 180°jumps

20 sec

2. Scissors jumps

20 sec

3. Single leg balance

20 sec

3. Single leg balance and pass

20 sec

4. Hop jump (both leg)

20 sec

4. Hop jump (single leg)

20 sec

5. Broad jump and hold

28 m

5. Single-leg hop and hold

14 m/leg

6. Crossover hop, hop, hop, stick

28 m

6. Crossover hop, hop, hop, stick

28 m

Squat jumps: Drop into deep knee, hip, and ankle flexion and then take off into a maximal vertical jump. On landing, immediately return to the starting position and repeat the initial jump.

180°jumps: Initiates a 2-footed jump with a direct vertical motion combined with a 180°rotation in midair, keeping arms away from the body to help maintain balance. When landing, immediately reverses this jump to the opposite direction.

Single-leg balance (and pass): This drill is performed on a balance device that provides an unstable surface. Begin by standing on one foot on the device. After the subject has improved, the training drills can incorporate ball catches and passes.

Hop jumps: Start by standing next to a small square balance board. Hop onto the board and then hop off on the opposite side. Repeat hopping on and off the board.

Broad jump and hold: Begin by swinging arms forward and jumping horizontally and vertically at approximately a 45°angle to achieve a maximum horizontal distance. The athlete lands with her knees flexed to approximately 90°.

Crossover hop, hop, hop, stick: Start on a single limb and jump at a diagonal across the body landing on the opposite limb with the foot pointing straight ahead and immediately redirect the jump in the opposite diagonal direction.

Scissors jumps: Start in a stride position with one foot well in front of other. Jump up, alternating foot positions in midair.

Single-leg hop and hold: Initiate the jump by swinging the arms forward while simultaneously extending at the hips and knees. The jump should carry the athlete up at an angle of approximately 45°and attain maximal distance for a single-leg landing. The subject is instructed to land on the jumping leg in deep knee flexion.

Data Analysis

The coordinate data obtained from the markers were not smoothed because of the expected noise-canceling property of the PCT. In each trial, we calculated the angular displacements of flexion/extension, valgus/varus, and internal/external tibial rotation using the PCT. The reference position for these measurements was obtained during the static trial. Cerulli et al. [28] reported that ACL strain begins to increase prior to landing and reaches a peak that corresponds to the peak ground reaction force. Therefore, we extracted each variable at the time of foot contact, as well as displacement from the event of foot contact to the event of peak vertical ground reaction force (i.e. during the landing). Moreover, we normalized the event of foot contact to the event of peak vertical ground reaction force as 100%.

The root mean square (RMS) of the EMG data was calculated for each trial. The EMG activities of the two hamstrings muscles were averaged together to represent the whole activity of the hamstrings (Ham). For the maximum voluntary contraction, the EMG data were recorded when the subject performed a maximum voluntary knee flexion and extension at 60 degrees of knee flexion against a manual resistance for three seconds. If the strength of their knee extension was greater than the manual resistance, some research assistants cooperated to provide additional resistance to their motion. The RMS of the EMG data was calculated and the mean RMS of the middle one second was used to normalize the dynamic contraction recorded during the landing (%MVC). The hamstrings/quadriceps (quadriceps refers to the rectus femoris in this experiment) ratio (HQR) was calculated to define the flexor muscle activation relative to the extensor muscle activation. The HQR was calculated according to procedures outline by Bencke et al. [15]. Average %MVC (RF and Ham) and HQR data output was computed during each of the following time frames: 1) 50 ms before foot contact and 2) 50 ms immediately after foot contact. The time period 50 ms before foot contact indicates pre-activity of these muscles. Considering an electromechanical delay of about 50 ms [29], the pre-activation force corresponds to the time before foot contact. The time period 50 ms after foot contact was chosen since a previous study found that the activity of the knee extensors peaked 46 ms after toe contact while the knee flexors showed minimum EMG activity [15]. It is thought that these activities include spinal reflexive neuromuscular activities [30].

The mean kinematics and electromyographic data of each subject were calculated from 3 successful trials. A repeated ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni tests was employed for statistical analysis of the kinematics data. Because the %MVC and HQR data did not distribute normally, a Friedman test with Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was employed for statistical analysis of these data. Each analysis was used to calculate differences with respect to the three time periods. Differences between preliminary trials 1 and 2 were considered as the changes due to the control session; these changes indicate the effects of learning from the landing task and day-to-day individual variation. Differences between preliminary trial 2 and the post-trial were considered as effects of the training session, which indicates how the training program influenced the subjects' landing patterns. All statistical comparisons were performed with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC (1, 3)), based on multiple same-day trials for kinematics and electromyographic data, and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated and are described in Table 2. These data indicate substantial or almost perfect reliability [31].
Table 2

ICC (1, 3) and SEM for kinematics and electromyographic data

 

Position at foot contact (deg)

 

Flexion

Ext. tibial rot.

Varus

ICC

0.93

0.94

0.95

SEM (deg)

1.80

1.42

0.61

 

Displacement during landing (deg)

 

Flexion

Int. tibial rot.

Varus

Valgus

ICC

0.96

0.87

0.64

0.86

SEM (deg)

1.41

2.18

1.22

0.39

 

Electromyographic data (%MVC)

 

Rectus femoris

Hamstrings

ICC

0.79

0.62

SEM (%)

10.84

9.49

ICC: Intraclass correlation coefficients

SEM: Standard error of measurement

Results

Kinematics Data

Mean joint kinematics during the single limb drop landing is illustrated in Figure 1. Regarding the position of the knee at foot contact, the knee flexion angle for the Post-training trial was significantly larger than that for the Pre-training 2 trial (p < 0.01) (Table 3). Regarding rotational displacements that occurred during landing, the absolute change in knee flexion for the Post-training trial was significantly larger than that for the Pre-training 2 trial (p < 0.001) (Table 4). No other significant differences between kinematic data could be detected. The observed statistical power of ANOVA for knee flexion, internal tibial rotation, and knee valgus of the tibia at foot contact was 0.96, 0.13, and 0.12, respectively. While, the observed statistical power of ANOVA for the absolute change in knee flexion, internal tibial rotation, and knee valgus during the landing were 1.00, 0.21, and 0.56, respectively.
Figure 1

Mean joint motion across all subjects during single limb drop landing from foot contact to 60 ms after foot contact for Pre-training 1, Pre-training 2, and Post-training. Data are presented for knee flexion (a), knee valgus (b), and internal tibial rotation (c).

Table 3

Mean (SE) values of position at foot contact Pre-training 1, Pre-training 2, and Post-training (deg)

 

Flexion

External tibial rot.

Varus

Pre-training 1

19.5 (2.4)

1.9 (2.2)

1.3 (0.9)

Pre-training 2

19.3 (2.5)*

0.3 (2.5)

0.1 (1.2)

Post-training

24.4 (2.1)*

1.1 (2.0)

0.6 (1.1)

*: p < 0.01 between Pre-training 2 and Post-training

Table 4

Mean (SE) values of rotational displacement during the landing Pre-training 1, Pre-training 2, and Post-training (deg)

 

Flexion

Internal tibial rot.

Varus

Valgus

Pre-training 1

31.6 (2.5)

12.3 (1.4)

1.4 (0.3)

2.8 (0.6)

Pre-training 2

34.3 (2.5)**

13.8 (1.8)

1.3 (0.3)

3.7 (0.7)

Post-training

40.2 (1.9)**

13.3 (2.0)

1.3 (0.4)

4.1 (0.6)

**: p < 0.001 between Pre-training 2 and Post-training

Electromyographic Data

For the 50 ms before foot contact, the %MVC of the Ham in the Post-training trial was significantly greater than that in the Pre-training 2 trial (p < 0.05), while no significant differences could be determined for the RF (Figure 2a). On the other hand, for the 50 ms immediately after foot contact, the %MVC of the Ham and the RF were not significantly different between all trials (Figure 2b). The HQR were not significantly different between all trials for neither the 50 ms before foot contact nor for the 50 ms immediately after foot contact (Figure 3).
Figure 2

%MVC of the rectus femoris (RF) and the hamstrings (Ham) for the 50 ms before foot contact (a) and for the 50 ms after foot contact (b). Boxes denote the middle 50% of the range and the median. The whiskers show the extent of the rest of the data. * p < 0.05. Figure 2 was quoted by 'The Journal of Clinical Sports Medicine (in Japanese)' 2007, Vol.24: pp 499-503.

Figure 3

Ham/Quad-ratio (HQR) before foot contact (a) and after foot contact (b). Boxes denote the middle 50% of the range and the median. The whiskers show the extent of the rest of data.

Discussion

This paper examined the effects of a jump and balance training program designed to prevent ACL injury on both knee kinematics and muscle activity during a single limb drop landing. Our training program consisted of plyometrics, jump and balance training, fundamental skills used in basketball and instructions on proper landing techniques. Each training session lasted for only approximately 20 minutes a day, therefore a trainer, coach or therapist could realistically perform this training program easily during practice or warm-up. This jump and balance training program resulted in increased knee flexion and increased hamstrings activity. While we discuss later about each factors; further, multi-component training, including jump and balance training could result in changes in knee kinematics and femoral muscle activity.

The training program was considered to influence knee flexion during landing. However, in tibial rotation and knee varus/valgus, the difference between the training sessions was smaller than the SE and learning effects (difference from the control session). Therefore, the changes in tibial rotation and knee varus/valgus were not considered to be effects of the training program. While the results regarding knee flexion partially proved our hypothesis, our hypotheses that training would decrease knee valgus and internal tibial rotation were not supported. For frontal plane knee motion previous studies [11, 14] reported no differences in knee valgus during single limb landing after plyometric or agility training. However, Myer et al. [12] reported that both plyometric and balance training decreased the knee abduction angle during a medial drop landing. There is a possibility that single limb drop landing is not suitable to detect the change in frontal plane knee motion. It is also thought that the number of subjects in this study was low and the statistical power for the valgus. This low statistical power makes it difficult to demonstrate the small changes in knee valgus. For tibial rotation, although we could not compare with previous studies, it is possible that these same reasons impede detecting the change in motion in knee frontal motion (i.e. selection of task and statistical problem). Otherwise, it may be difficult to control tibial rotation, like joint laxity.

According to other studies that used video analysis, the position of the knee at the moment of injury is in slight knee flexion and valgus rotation with either internal or external tibial rotation [1921]. Teitz [19] reported that the angle of knee flexion at the time of injury was less than 30 degrees. In this study, slight knee flexion, valgus and internal tibial rotation also occurred during the single limb drop landing. It is thought that decreasing tibial rotation and valgus rotation or increasing the angle of knee flexion is effective in preventing this knee position at the moment of ACL injury. Some previous studies [11, 12] indicated that training increases the knee flexion angle during both limb landings. The results of this study agree with those previous studies. Onate et al.[13] reported that videotape feedback and instruction increased peak knee flexion during landing. In this study, subjects increased not only peak knee flexion, but also initial knee flexion at foot contact. Because subjects were instructed to go through more knee flexion during training, increased peak knee flexion was not a novel finding. However, continuing the jump and balance training over a period of time also increased initial knee flexion. Thus it can be said that these increases in knee flexion are a direct effect of the jump and balance training.

Increased knee flexion angles may lead to changes in the function of the quadriceps and the hamstrings. In slight knee flexion, i.e., less than 30 degrees, contraction of the quadriceps strains the ACL [3234]. Hamstrings contraction cannot reduce ACL strain with the knee slightly flexed because these muscles meet the tibia at a small angle [33, 35]. On the other hand, at angles of knee flexion greater than 60 degrees, quadriceps contraction does not increase ACL strain [34] and the anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation as a result of quadriceps contraction is decreased [36]. Moreover, hamstrings contraction reduces anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation at these angles [37]. Therefore, increasing the knee flexion angle during landing may have a beneficial effect to reduce the strain in the ACL. From the results of this study, the jump and balance training program which increased the knee flexion angle during landing also had the effect of decreasing the risk of ACL injury.

Hamstrings activity was also increased after training. In the training sessions, subjects were instructed to bend their knees and keep their knees neutral. Subjects were directed to keep a deep knee flexion angle during landing and to stabilize the position of their knee joint on the balance board. It is reported that peak activity of the hamstrings occur between 50-70 degrees of knee flexion [38]. Hamstrings contraction and coactivation of the hamstrings and the quadriceps have an important role to stabilize the knee joint [37, 3941]. Therefore, the subjects learned the correct posture and landing technique which would increase hamstrings activity.

The activity of the hamstrings before foot contact was significantly increased. Recently several researchers have focused on pre-activated muscle patterns in response to anticipated movements and joint loads [15, 42]. Pre-activation is important for the dynamic stability of the knee because it provides fast compensation for encountered external loads. Wojtys and Huston [30] described the possibility that pre-activation can provide adequate muscular protection to restrain the knee. Although there are several reflexes that occur after a perturbation [40], the muscle activity is too slow to provide any ligament protection [43, 44]. Between preparatory and reactive muscle activation, there is a period of latency that results from electromechanical delay (EMD) [29]. EMD is the delay between neural stimulation of a muscle and the development of muscle tension. Pre-activation is thought to be beneficial for stabilizing the knee after a landing. For this study, although internal tibial rotation and tibial translation were not changed after training, it can be said that the increase in the pre-activity of the hamstrings helped to stabilize the knee joint during landing.

There are some limitations in this study. First, we analyzed only the kinematics of the knee joint, even though hip and ankle joint kinematics also play an important role during landing. We examined only the short term effects of the ACL injury prevention training. The incidence of ACL injury during the season was not investigated. We examined the effects of multi-component training. The effects of each training should be examined in the future. We did not consider the effects of menstrual cycle. Our study included control and training sessions, although setting up a control group and an intervention group is ideal to examine the effects of training. However, there were no changes in basketball training during these sessions, which were conducted during the preseason, and training and matches occurred at the same frequency during both sessions. Therefore, the changes in kinematics during the landing could be attributable to the intervened training. Finally, the statistical power for several of the data was relatively low. Using ANOVA at a low statistical power might cause type 2 errors. Although considerable differences in results might be significant, other findings may be overlooked. Future research should be performed to examine the long term effects of the ACL injury prevention program in a large sample size.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that the jump and balance training increased knee flexion and hamstrings activity in female basketball athletes during a single limb drop landing. This program, which includes plyometrics, jump and balance training, fundamental basketball skills, and proper landing instructions, might have partial effects that avoid the characteristic knee position of ACL injury, thereby preventing injury. However, the expected changes in frontal and transverse kinematics of the knee were not observed.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (16500394) in 2004 and 2005.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health and Sports, Niigata University of Health and Welfare
(2)
Department of Human System Science, Graduate School of Decision Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology
(3)
National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities
(4)
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University

References

  1. Hurd WJ, Snyder-Mackler L: Knee instability after acute ACL rupture affects movement patterns during the mid-stance phase of gait. J Orthop Res. 2007, 25: 1369-1377. 10.1002/jor.20440.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Kvist J, Ek A, Sporrstedt K, Good L: Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005, 13: 393-397. 10.1007/s00167-004-0591-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kvist J: Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation. Sports Med. 2004, 34: 269-280. 10.2165/00007256-200434040-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sommerlath K, Lysholm J, Gillquist J: The long-term course after treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A 9 to 16 year followup. Am J Sports Med. 1991, 19: 156-162. 10.1177/036354659101900211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hewett TE, Lindenfeld TN, Riccobene JV, Noyes FR: The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1999, 27: 699-706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Braekken IH, Skjolberg A, Olsen OE, Bahr R: Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: a prospective intervention study over three seasons. Clin J Sport Med. 2003, 13: 71-78. 10.1097/00042752-200303000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mandelbaum BR, Silvers HJ, Watanabe DS, Knarr JF, Thomas SD, Griffin LY, Kirkendall DT, Garrett W: Effectiveness of a neuromuscular and proprioceptive training program in preventing anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2005, 33: 1003-1010. 10.1177/0363546504272261.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Olsen OE, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Holme I, Bahr R: Exercises to prevent lower limb injuries in youth sports: cluster randomised controlled trial. Bmj. 2005, 330: 449-10.1136/bmj.38330.632801.8F.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Petersen W, Braun C, Bock W, Schmidt K, Weimann A, Drescher W, Eiling E, Stange R, Fuchs T, Hedderich J, Zantop T: A controlled prospective case control study of a prevention training program in female team handball players: the German experience. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005, 125: 614-621. 10.1007/s00402-005-0793-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pfeiffer RP, Shea KG, Roberts D, Grandstrand S, Bond L: Lack of effect of a knee ligament injury prevention program on the incidence of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006, 88: 1769-1774. 10.2106/JBJS.E.00616.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lephart SM, Abt JP, Ferris CM, Sell TC, Nagai T, Myers JB, Irrgang JJ: Neuromuscular and biomechanical characteristic changes in high school athletes: a plyometric versus basic resistance program. Br J Sports Med. 2005, 39: 932-938. 10.1136/bjsm.2005.019083.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Myer GD, Ford KR, McLean SG, Hewett TE: The effects of plyometric versus dynamic stabilization and balance training on lower extremity biomechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2006, 34: 445-455.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Onate JA, Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Giuliani C, Yu B, Garrett WE: Instruction of Jump-Landing Technique Using Videotape Feedback. Am J Sports Med. 2005, 33 (6): 831-42. 10.1177/0363546504271499.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pollard CD, Sigward SM, Ota S, Langford K, Powers CM: The influence of in-season injury prevention training on lower-extremity kinematics during landing in female soccer players. Clin J Sport Med. 2006, 16: 223-227. 10.1097/00042752-200605000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bencke J, Naesborg H, Simonsen EB, Klausen K: Motor pattern of the knee joint muscles during side-step cutting in European team handball. Influence on muscular co-ordination after an intervention study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000, 10: 68-77. 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2000.010002068.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chimera NJ, Swanik KA, Swanik CB, Straub SJ: Effects of plyometric training on muscle-activation strategies and performance in female athletes. J Athl Train. 2004, 39: 24-31.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. DeMorat G, Weinhold P, Blackburn T, Chudik S, Garrett W: Aggressive quadriceps loading can induce noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2004, 32: 477-483. 10.1177/0363546503258928.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chappell JD, Creighton RA, Giuliani C, Yu B, Garrett WE: Kinematics and electromyography of landing preparation in vertical stop-jump: risks for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2007, 35: 235-241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Teitz CC: Video analysis of ACL injuries. Prevention of noncontact ACL injuries. Edited by: Griffin LY. 2001, Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 87-92.Google Scholar
  20. Boden BP, Dean GS, Feagin JA, Garrett WE: Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics. 2000, 23: 573-578.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Olsen OE, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Bahr R: Injury mechanisms for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in team handball: a systematic video analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2004, 32: 1002-1012. 10.1177/0363546503261724.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nagano Y, Ida H, Akai M, Fukubayashi T: Gender differences in knee kinematics and muscle activity during single limb drop landing. The Knee. 2007, 14: 218-223. 10.1016/j.knee.2006.11.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Andriacchi TP, Alexander EJ, Toney MK, Dyrby C, Sum J: A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: applied to a study of knee kinematics. J Biomech Eng. 1998, 120: 743-749. 10.1115/1.2834888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Grood ES, Suntay WJ: A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983, 105: 136-144. 10.1115/1.3138397.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hewett TE, Stroupe AL, Nance TA, Noyes FR: Plyometric training in female athletes. Decreased impact forces and increased hamstring torques. Am J Sports Med. 1996, 24: 765-773. 10.1177/036354659602400611.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Myer GD, Ford KR, Hewett TE: Rationale and Clinical Techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention Among Female Athletes. J Athl Train. 2004, 39: 352-364.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Myer GD, Ford KR, Hewett TE: Methodological approaches and rationale for training to prevent anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004, 14: 275-285. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00410.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cerulli G, Benoit DL, Lamontagne M, Caraffa A, Liti A: In vivo anterior cruciate ligament strain behaviour during a rapid deceleration movement: case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003, 11: 307-311. 10.1007/s00167-003-0403-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bigland-Ritchie B, Johansson R, Lippold OC, Woods JJ: Contractile speed and EMG changes during fatigue of sustained maximal voluntary contractions. J Neurophysiol. 1983, 50: 313-324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wojtys EM, Huston LJ: Neuromuscular performance in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient lower extremities. Am J Sports Med. 1994, 22: 89-104. 10.1177/036354659402200116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33: 159-174. 10.2307/2529310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Arms SW, Pope MH, Johnson RJ, Fischer RA, Arvidsson I, Eriksson E: The biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation and reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1984, 12: 8-18. 10.1177/036354658401200102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Renstrom P, Arms SW, Stanwyck TS, Johnson RJ, Pope MH: Strain within the anterior cruciate ligament during hamstring and quadriceps activity. Am J Sports Med. 1986, 14: 83-87. 10.1177/036354658601400114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Beynnon BD, Fleming BC, Johnson RJ, Nichols CE, Renstrom PA, Pope MH: Anterior cruciate ligament strain behavior during rehabilitation exercises in vivo. Am J Sports Med. 1995, 23: 24-34. 10.1177/036354659502300105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pandy MG, Shelburne KB: Dependence of cruciate-ligament loading on muscle forces and external load. J Biomech. 1997, 30: 1015-1024. 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00070-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hirokawa S, Solomonow M, Lu Y, Lou ZP, D'Ambrosia R: Anterior-posterior and rotational displacement of the tibia elicited by quadriceps contraction. Am J Sports Med. 1992, 20: 299-306. 10.1177/036354659202000311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. More RC, Karras BT, Neiman R, Fritschy D, Woo SL, Daniel DM: Hamstrings--an anterior cruciate ligament protagonist. An in vitro study. Am J Sports Med. 1993, 21: 231-237. 10.1177/036354659302100212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Escamilla RF: Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001, 33: 127-141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Solomonow M, Krogsgaard M: Sensorimotor control of knee stability. A review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001, 11: 64-80. 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2001.011002064.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Solomonow M, Baratta R, Zhou BH, Shoji H, Bose W, Beck C, D'Ambrosia R: The synergistic action of the anterior cruciate ligament and thigh muscles in maintaining joint stability. Am J Sports Med. 1987, 15: 207-213. 10.1177/036354658701500302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Baratta R, Solomonow M, Zhou BH, Letson D, Chuinard R, D'Ambrosia R: Muscular coactivation. The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. Am J Sports Med. 1988, 16: 113-122. 10.1177/036354658801600205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dyhre-Poulsen P, Simonsen EB, Voigt M: Dynamic control of muscle stiffness and H reflex modulation during hopping and jumping in man. J Physiol. 1991, 437: 287-304.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Yasuda K, Erickson AR, Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Pope MH: Dynamic elongation behavior in the medial collateral and anterior cruciate ligaments during lateral impact loading. J Orthop Res. 1993, 11: 190-198. 10.1002/jor.1100110206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Buchanan TS, Kim AW, Lloyd DG: Selective muscle activation following rapid varus/valgus perturbations at the knee. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996, 28: 870-876.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nagano et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement