- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Autogenous osteochondral graft transplantation for steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle: A report of three young patients
© Fujita et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 14 February 2011
- Accepted: 26 April 2012
- Published: 26 April 2012
Steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle is a relatively uncommon condition and is often difficult to select appropriate treatment especially in young patients. Three young men (aged 25, 18, and 24) presented with severe pain and dysfunction of the knee diagnosed as steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle by magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs). Full-thickness cartilage defects sized 20 × 10, 15 × 10, and 30 × 20 mm respectively were classified as International Cartilage Repair Society Grade IV lesions and treated with osteochondral autograft transplantation. They were treated successfully with osteochondral autograft transplantation certificated by post-operative MRI and second look arthroscopy.
- Steroid-induced osteonecrosis
- Osteochodral autograft transplantation
- Femoral condyle
Steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle is a relatively uncommon condition and its clinical course and established treatment remain controversial, mainly because of the limited number of cases [1, 2]. Steroid-induced osteonecrosis is a debilitating clinical problem that frequently occurs in younger patients and is associated with a variety of disease states. Progression of necrosis may lead to subchondral bone collapse, joint incongruity, subsequent joint destruction, and the need for surgical treatment. A variety of surgical techniques have been performed such as high tibial osteotomy, unilateral knee arthroplasty, and total knee arthroplasty . However, these treatment options are usually considered over indications and not the ideal choices for younger patients from the viewpoint of articular cartilage regeneration and restoration. Recently, autogenous osteochondral graft has gained clinical popularity as a treatment for spontaneous osteonecrosis and cartilage defect [4–6]. Osteochondral autograft transplantation enables the restoration of articular cartilage and cartilage regeneration is expected.
We encountered three young patients with steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle and performed osteochondral autograft transplantations. In this report, we outline the cases and give an overview of their treatment.
As steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle is a relatively rare disease, literature regarding its treatment and histology is sparse [1, 2], and there are no prospective randomized trials comparing treatment options. Thus, especially in young patients, surgeons often have difficulties in selecting an appropriate treatment. Several reports have described surgical procedures for the treatment of steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle [7–10]. However, there are no clear indications established for these surgical methods or for conservative treatment. As for the primary spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK), P.J. Yates et al. reported that middle aged patients presenting with primary SONK not visible on plain radiographs, can expect a relatively rapid and complete recovery with a simple non-operative treatment . Lotke et al. described that conservative treatment will do well if the size of the lesion is small (less than 45% of the condylar width, or less than 3.5 square centimeters), however, thereafter degenerative changes will develop in almost all patients. However there are few literatures described of clinical course and prognosis of steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle. Prosthetic replacement remains the most predictable modality for treating the advanced disease, however as compared to osteoarthritis, the complication rate may be higher and the ultimate success rate slightly lower [3, 13]. In addition, for young patients such as our patients, this option may be considered an over indication and is not the ideal from the view point of articular cartilage regeneration and restoration. There are other choices of treatment in clinical use such as debridement , abrasion chondroplasty, subchondral drilling , and microfracture . These methods are based on the perforation of the underlying subchondral bone and enable the migration of pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow into the defect zone. Wiedel et al. reported his experience with arthroscopic evaluation and treatment of ten knees with steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the knee . He suggested that arthroscopic debridement provides reasonable symptomatic relief, allowing the patients to return to activities of daily living. However these methods have led to the formation of fibrocartilagious scar tissue with structural and biomechanical properties that are inferior to those of hyaline cartilage [16, 18, 19]. To this end, osteochondral allo/autografting has recently received much attention as an alternative approach for repairing joint surfaces. Osteochondral allografting is one of the available techniques for transplantation of osteochondral bone, however it has the potential risks of disease transmission or immune graft rejection [20–23]. Therefore, in three cases presented here, we indicated the osteochondral autografting for the young patients with steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle who were resistant to conservative treatments including restricted weight-bearing with crutches, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid.
Recently, use of an autogenous osteochondral graft has gained in clinical popularity because of its technical feasibility and cost effectiveness. Animal and clinical studies have shown that osteochondral plugs maintain hyaline cartilage coverage over the subchondral bone . However, there are few studies regarding autogenous osteochondral graft transplantation for steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle. Here we reported three cases of steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle treated successfully with autogenous osteochondral graft transplantation. Nakagawa et al. also previously reported a case of steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle measuring 10 cm2 treated by osteochondral graft transplantation with a satisfactory result . In contrast, Ching-Jen Wang et al. reported a poor result in one patient with a 6 cm2 defect undergoing osteochondral autograft for steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle . In our cases, the average defect size was 2.83 cm2 (range 1.5 to 5.0 cm2) and all patients received satisfactory results. One of the factors for the success of autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty is the size of osteochondral articular cartilage defect. Hangody et al. reported that the defect size between 1 and 4 cm2 is the promising factor for the success of the procedure. Lane et al. suggested that because of the difficulty of matching the topography of recipient and donor joint surfaces, the amount of tissue that can be successfully transferred in most surgeons’ hands is limited to less than 2 cm2. Since autogenous osteochondral graft transplantation is a surgical procedure with free bone graft transplantation, the engraftment of the transplanted graft is an important issue, however no detailed analysis of this issue has been reported in cases of surgically treated steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle. Our study has shown that the transplanted grafts remained viable up to two years after surgeries based on MRIs examination and arthroscopic evaluation. However, the lesion in case 2 was partially associated with fibrous tissue formation according to a second-look arthroscopic evaluation despite a good clinical outcome. In this patient we were unable to completely perform osteochondral autograft transplantation and only performed microfracture at the deep posterior part of the lesion because of the location of the lesion. In case 3, similarly, the posterior aspect of the lesion was difficult to reach for grafting even with the knee fully flexed. A previous study suggested that osteochondral graft stability plays an important role in preserving the histologic properties of the cartilage . As a result, in our cases, appropriate press-fit techniques to the peripheral lesion may have led to the reconstruction of smooth articular cartilage despite fibrous tissue coverage at the non-grafting site. However, our cases need to be followed for a longer period since our follow-up period is not long enough for the evaluation of the graft integrity, especially under steroid induced pathology.
Osteochondral autograft transplantation for focal full thickness articular cartilage defects induced by steroids achieved excellent clinical results in three knees. Even though the lesion of osteonecrosis extended to the non-weight-bearing deep posterior site where it was difficult to perform the perpendicular graft transplantation and we only did the bone marrow stimulation with microfracture technique, the lesion including the non-weight-bearing area was successfully healed with smooth articular surface and fibrous tissue, leading to excellent clinical outcomes in the short-term follow up. We believe the osteochondral graft has the potential to prevent or delay the development of degenerative changes of the knee and is a good treatment method for focal steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle.
Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying image.
- Sasaki T, Yagi T, Monji J, Yasuda K, Masuda T, Fukazawa M, et al: Steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle–a clinical study of eighteen knees in ten patients. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1986, 60: 361-372.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kelman GJ, Williams GW, Colwell CW, Walker RH: Steroid-related osteonecrosis of the knee. Two case reports and a literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990, 171-176.Google Scholar
- Gorczynski C, Meislin R: Osteonecrosis of the distal femur. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2006, 63: 145-152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakagawa Y, Matsusue Y, Nakamura T: Osteochondral graft transplantation for steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle. Lancet. 2003, 362: 402-10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14031-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karataglis D, Green MA, Learmonth DJ: Autologous osteochondral transplantation for the treatment of chondral defects of the knee. Knee. 2006, 13: 32-35. 10.1016/j.knee.2005.05.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang CJ: Treatment of focal articular cartilage lesions of the knee with autogenous osteochondral graftsA 2- to 4-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Traum Su. 2002, 122: 169-172. 10.1007/s004020100343.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bayne O, Langer F, Pritzker KP, Houpt J, Gross AE: Osteochondral allografts in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1985, 16: 727-740.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vakil N, Sparberg M: Steroid-related osteonecrosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1989, 96: 62-67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiedel JD: Arthroscopy in steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the knee. Arthroscopy. 1985, 1: 68-72. 10.1016/S0749-8063(85)80082-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ochi M, Kimori K, Sumen Y, Ikuta Y: A case of steroid-induced osteonecrosis of femoral condyle treated surgically. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995, 312: 226-231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yates PJ, Calder JD, Stranks GJ, Conn KS, Peppercorn D, Thomas NP: Early MRI diagnosis and non-surgical management of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Knee. 2007, 14: 112-116. 10.1016/j.knee.2006.10.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lotke PA, Ecker ML: Osteonecrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988, 70: 470-473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seldes RM, Tan V, Duffy G, Rand JA, Lotke PA: Total knee arthroplasty for steroid-induced osteonecrosis. J Arthroplasty. 1999, 14: 533-537. 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90073-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Magnuson PB: The classic: Joint debridement: surgical treatment of degenerative arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974, 101: 4-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson LL: Arthroscopic abrasion arthroplasty historical and pathologic perspective: present status. Arthroscopy. 1986, 2: 54-69. 10.1016/S0749-8063(86)80012-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Insall J: The Pridie debridement operation for osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974, 101: 61-67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ: The microfracture technic in the management of complete cartilage defects in the knee joint. Orthopade. 1999, 28: 26-32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Campbell CJ: The healing of cartilage defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969, 64: 45-63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell N, Shepard N: The resurfacing of adult rabbit articular cartilage by multiple perforations through the subchondral bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976, 58: 230-233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bugbee WD, Convery FR: Osteochondral allograft transplantation. Clin Sports Med. 1999, 18: 67-75. 10.1016/S0278-5919(05)70130-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fitzpatrick PL, Morgan DA: Fresh osteochondral allografts: a 6-10-year review. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998, 68: 573-579. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb02103.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stevenson S, Dannucci GA, Sharkey NA, Pool RR: The fate of articular cartilage after transplantation of fresh and cryopreserved tissue-antigen-matched and mismatched osteochondral allografts in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989, 71: 1297-1307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strong DM, Friedlaender GE, Tomford WW, Springfield DS, Shives TC, Burchardt H: Immunologic responses in human recipients of osseous and osteochondral allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996, 326: 107-114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Udvarhelyi I, Szigeti I, Bely M: Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular cartilage defects: application in clinical practice. Orthopedics. 1998, 21: 751-756.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Makino T, Fujioka H, Terukina M, Yoshiya S, Matsui N, Kurosaka M: The effect of graft sizing on osteochondral transplantation. Arthroscopy. 2004, 20: 837-840.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.