Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A description of the volume and intensity of sporadic physical activity among adults

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation20157:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-7-2

Received: 2 October 2014

Accepted: 5 January 2015

Published: 10 January 2015

Abstract

Background

Emerging evidence indicates that accumulating physical activity in periods of less than 10 minutes, termed sporadic physical activity (SPA), has similar effects on health as a similar volume of bouted physical activity (BPA). The purpose of this study was to describe the volume and intensity of SPA in adults.

Methods

Participants consisted of a representative sample of 6040 adults aged 20 years and older from the 2003–2006 U.S. National Health and Examination Nutrition Survey. Physical activity was measured over 7 days using Actigraph AM-7164 accelerometers. Each minute of accelerometer data was initially categorized by intensity (sedentary, light, moderate-to-vigorous), and then non-sedentary time was categorized as following a BPA or SPA pattern (≥ or < 10 consecutive minutes).

Results

American adults accumulated 103 minutes/day of SPA of an intensity, which represented 27% of their total (BPA + SPA) daily physical activity. Only 3 minutes/day of the SPA was of a moderate-to-vigorous intensity; however, participants accumulated 16 minutes/day of moderate-to-vigorous activity embedded within light intensity BPA. This embedded moderate-to-vigorous activity represented 85% of total daily moderate-to-vigorous activity.

Conclusions

SPA accounted for about a quarter of total daily physical activity. While the amount of moderate-to-vigorous SPA was minimal, a significant amount of moderate-to-vigorous activity was accumulated within bouts of primarily light intensity activity.

Keywords

Motor activity Health surveys Adult

Background

Physical inactivity is common in the modern Western lifestyle[1], where it plays a role in the development of several chronic diseases[2]. Public health guidelines for physical activity are that adults accumulate at least 150 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) in bouts of 10 minutes or more[35]. This guideline is met by less than 15% of North American adults[6, 7]. While sporadic physical activity (SPA), or physical activity occurring in periods of less than 10 consecutive minutes, is not recognized as providing health benefits within the current physical activity guidelines, a growing body of evidence suggests otherwise. Specifically, sporadic MVPA is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors independent of bouted MVPA[810], and the associations between SPA and cardiometabolic risk factors are as strong as they are for bouted physical activity (BPA)[10]. Notable barriers to physical activity participation, including a lack of time and self-efficacy[1113], may be less relevant for SPA than BPA.

Very little is known about how much SPA people accumulate. Data from a representative sample of adolescents[14] and a small convenience sample of older adults[15] suggest that approximately 66% of MVPA occurs sporadically. However, the relative time spent engaging in moderate or vigorous intensity SPA is unknown. Additionally, no descriptive information exists about the amount of time spent engaging in light intensity SPA. There is a growing body of evidence indicating that light intensity physical activity provides health benefits independent of MVPA[16, 17]. Thus, it is important to consider all movement intensities in studies of physical activity and not just MVPA.

The purpose of this study is to describe SPA in adults. Specifically, this study describes how much daily SPA adults accumulate, the intensity at which it is accumulated, the contribution of SPA to total physical activity (ie, SPA + BPA), and whether these characteristics vary by sociodemographic factors. These results provide foundational knowledge that could be used to help design SPA interventions.

Methods

Study design and participants

Participants were from the 2003–2004 and 2005–2006 cycles of the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey[18]. NHANES collects data through home interviews and physical examinations in mobile exam centers. All participants gave informed consent and NHANES was granted ethics approved by the National Center for Health Statistics.

The current study was limited to NHANES participants aged 20 years of age and older, non-pregnant women, and those who completed both the home interview and mobile exam center visit. This left an eligible sample of 9451. We excluded 3411 participants with missing or invalid physical activity accelerometer data (explained below), leaving a final sample of 6040.

Potential selection bias arising from the lack of valid physical activity accelerometer data in 36% of eligible participants was assessed by comparing several characteristics (sex, age, ethnicity, obesity) between the 6040 participants with valid data to the 3411 without. Differences were observed between the two samples for age, sex, and ethnicity but not for obesity. The age, sex, and racial differences were used to derive new sample weights to account for the selection bias.

Sociodemographic variables

Sociodemographic variables included sex, age (20–39 years old, 40–59 years old or 60+ years old), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American or other) and body mass index (BMI) status (underweight <18.5 kg/m2, normal weight 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, overweight 25–29.9 kg/m2, or obese ≥30 kg/m2[19]). BMI values were calculated from measured heights and weights.

Physical activity

SPA and BPA were assessed using Actigraph AM-7164 uniaxial accelerometers (Actigraph, Ft. Pensacola, FL). These accelerometers recorded average movement intensity, measured by counts in 1-minute intervals or epochs. Participants were given accelerometers at their mobile examination center visit and asked to wear them on an elasticized belt on their right hip for the 7 days after the visit. Participants were instructed to only remove the accelerometer when sleeping or when the accelerometer would get wet (e.g., bathing or swimming). After the 7 day measurement period was completed, participants mailed the accelerometers back to the NHANES researchers. The accelerometers were then tested to ensure calibration, the data were downloaded, and implausible count values were removed from the accelerometer database.

Further data reduction of the accelerometer database was carried out by the authors based on existing protocols[10, 2024]. Initially, we removed non-wear periods and calculated the wear time for each day. Non-wear periods were defined as periods with ≥ 90 minutes of zero counts, with an allowance for 2 minutes of counts between 0 and 100[22]. Next, each day was coded as valid or invalid and invalid days were removed from the dataset. Days were considered valid if the participant had ≥ 10 hours of wear time[20, 21, 24]. We then removed participants with 3 or fewer valid days[20, 21, 23, 24].

After removing invalid days and participants with an insufficient number of valid days from the accelerometer database, each minute of physical activity data was categorized into one of four intensities based on established cut-points for the Actigraph AM-7164 accelerometer[20, 25]. Specifically, values between 0–99 counts per minute were classified as sedentary, values between 100–2019 were classified as light intensity, values between 2020–5998 were classified as moderate intensity, and values ≥ 5999 were classified as vigorous intensity. Data were then classified as being either BPA or SPA of different intensities, as explained in the following paragraph and as illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Classification of physical activity data from 95 minutes of accelerometer data obtained on a 24-year-old man.

Initially, bouted MVPA was defined in the accelerometer database as periods of at least 10 consecutive minutes where the accelerometer counts exceeded the moderate threshold, with an allowance of 20% of the counts (e.g., 2 minutes for a 10 minute bout) being below the threshold[9, 10]. Once the 20% threshold was surpassed, the bout was stopped. The time spent in bouted MVPA was summed, a daily average was created, and this information was exported into a new dataset. Bouted MVPA was then removed from the accelerometer database. Next, light intensity BPA was defined, in what remained of the accelerometer database, as periods of at least 10 consecutive minutes where the accelerometer counts exceeded the light intensity threshold, with an allowance of 20% of the counts being below the threshold. Once the 20% threshold was surpassed, the bout was stopped. Note that light intensity BPA included MVPA, if the amount of MVPA did not satisfy the criteria for bouted MVPA. After light intensity BPA was counted, a daily average was created, and this information was exported into the new dataset. Light intensity BPA was then removed from the accelerometer database. At this phase, the accelerometer database only contained SPA and sedentary behavior. The daily averages for light intensity SPA, moderate intensity SPA, and vigorous intensity SPA were then calculated. These values were then exported in the new dataset. Total physical activity was then calculated in the new dataset as SPA + BPA. The new dataset was then merged with the other relevant NHANES datasets (eg, datasets that contained demographic information, BMI, etc.), and this merged dataset was use for the statistical analyses.

Statistical analysis

Analyses were conducted using SAS v9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and SPSS v22 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) and accounted for the clustered nature of NHANES and the adjusted sample weights that we created. Since the physical activity data were not normally distributed, we reported medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). Differences in median values across age, sex, ethnicity, and BMI groups were determined using Kruskal-Wallis omnibus and pairwise comparison tests. A p-value of < 0.05 was used to denote statistical significance. Bonferroni adjusted p-values were used when there were multiple pairwise comparisons (ie, p .05/number of pairwise comparisons).

Results

A description of the sample is presented in Table 1. The majority of participants were between the ages of 20–30 and 40–59 years and of non-Hispanic white ethnicity. Approximately 32% were obese.
Table 1

Characteristics of the study sample

 

Total

Men

Women

Variable

Crude N

Weighted % (SE)

Crude N

Weighted % (SE)

Crude N

Weighted % (SE)

Age

      

 20-39 years

1672

37.3 (1.1)

904

39.8 (1.5)

768

35.0 (1.2)

 40-59 years

1968

39.4 (1.0)

976

39.4 (1.3)

992

39.5 (1.2)

 ≥60 years

2400

23.3 (1.0)

1209

20.9 (1.1)

1191

25.5 (1.2)

 Race/Ethnicity

      

 Non-Hispanic white

3241

72.2 (2.3)

1666

72.3 (2.3)

1575

72.1 (2.4)

 Non-Hispanic black

1169

11.3 (1.4)

581

10.5 (1.3)

588

12.0 (1.5)

 Mexican American

1226

7.7 (1.1)

650

8.6 (1.2)

576

6.8 (1.8)

 Other

404

8.8 (0.8)

192

8.6 (0.9)

212

9.1 (0.9)

Body Mass Index

      

 <18.5 kg/m2

131

2.3 (0.2)

63

2.1 (0.3)

68

2.6 (0.3)

 18.5-24.9 kg/m2

1767

31.8 (0.9)

826

26.7 (1.3)

941

36.6 (1.5)

 25-29.9 kg/m2

2163

34.1 (0.9)

1283

40.3 (1.2)

880

28.1 (1.1)

 ≥30 kg/m2

1979

31.9 (1.1)

917

30.9 (1.5)

1062

32.8 (1.2)

Median daily minutes of SPA in the total sample is shown in Table 2. American adults spent 103 minutes/day (IQR: 85–121 minutes/day) engaging in SPA, which represented 27% (IQR: 19-36%) of their total (SPA + BPA) physical activity. The vast majority of SPA was of a light intensity (i.e., 100 of 103 minutes) and 91% of participants accumulated no vigorous intensity SPA. Since almost all group comparisons were statistically significant, the statistical significance of these differences is not highlighted in the remainder of the Results.
Table 2

Median (interquartile range) daily time spent in sporadic physical activity of different intensities, in minutes per day and as a fraction of total of sporadic physical activity, within the total sample and according to sex, age, race/ethnicity, and body mass index

 

Minutes per day

Fraction of total physical activity

 

Light intensity

Moderate intensity

Vigorous intensity

All intensities

Light intensity

Moderate intensity

Vigorous intensity

All intensities

Total sample

100.4 (82.8-117.8)

2.1 (1.1-3.6)

0 (0–0)

103.0 (85.4-120.8)

26.1 (18.2-34.8)

0.5 (0.3-0.9)

0 (0–0)

26.9 (18.8-35.7)

Sex

        

 Men

97.6 (79.8-114.5)

2.6 (1.4-4.5)

0 (0–0)

100.9 (82.7-118.3)

24.7 (16.8-34.0)

0.6 (0.4-1.1)

0 (0–0)

25.6 (17.4-35.2)

 Women

102.9 (86.0-121.0)

1.6 (0.9-2.8)

0 (0–0)

105.2 (88.6-124.1)

27.3 (19.6-35.5)

0.4 (0.2-0.7)

0 (0–0)

27.7 (20.0-36.2)

Age

        

 20-39 years

97.6 (78.3-114.8)

2.8 (1.7-4.6)

0 (0–0)

100.9 (81.7-118.4)

23.4 (15.7-31.6)

0.7 (0.4-1.3)

0 (0–0)

24.3 (16.3-32.9)

 40-59 years

101.4 (84.5-119.8)

2.3 (1.3-3.6)

0 (0–0)

104.5 (87.2-123.5)

25.1 (18.1-33.0)

0.5 (0.3-0.9)

0 (0–0)

25.9 (18.6-34.0)

 ≥60 years

102.3 (87.3-119.1)

0.9 (0.5-1.6)

0 (0–0)

103.7 (88.4-120.5)

32.0 (23.8-44.4)

0.3 (0.2-0.5)

0 (0–0)

32.6 (24.2-44.9)

Race/Ethnicity

        

 Non-Hispanic white

100.6 (83.8-117.7)

2.0 (1.0-3.7)

0 (0–0)

103.4 (86.4-120.7)

26.7 (19.0-35.3)

0.5 (0.3-0.9)

0 (0–0)

27.4 (19.6-36.2)

 Non-Hispanic black

102.8 (84.8-120.1)

2.0 (1.2-3.3)

0 (0–0)

105.3 (87.4-123.1)

25.8 (18.3-34.8)

0.5 (0.3-0.8)

0 (0–0)

26.4 (18.8-35.7)

 Mexican American

92.0 (69.1-111.9)

2.2 (1.3-3.6)

0 (0–0)

94.6 (71.7-115.9)

19.9 (12.7-29.7)

0.5 (0.3-0.8)

0 (0–0)

20.6 (13.1-30.6)

 Other

101.4 (80.8-122.9)

2.2 (1.3-3.5)

0 (0–0)

104.4 (84.8-125.7)

26.3 (16.7-35.6)

0.5 (0.3-0.9)

0 (0–0)

26.9 (17.1-36.5)

Body Mass Index

        

 <18.5 kg/m2

107.8 (84.6-121.7)

2.2 (1.2-4.4)

0 (0–0)

110.4 (90.7-126.4)

30.2 (21.9-41.3)

0.7 (0.4-1.1)

0 (0–0)

31.3 (22.6-43.1)

 18.5-24.9 kg/m2

100.7 (82.6-119.0)

2.3 (1.2-3.9)

0 (0–0)

103.3 (85.6-122.0)

25.4 (17.4-33.4)

0.5 (0.3-0.9)

0 (0–0)

26.3 (18.1-34.5)

 25-29.9 kg/m2

100.0 (83.3-117.2)

2.1 (1.0-3.7)

0 (0–0)

103.0 (86.2-120.8)

25.8 (18.2-34.3)

0.5 (0.3-0.9)

0 (0–0)

26.4 (18.7-35.5)

 ≥30 kg/m2

99.5 (82.3-116.8)

1.9 (1.1-3.2)

0 (0–0)

102.2 (84.4-119.6)

26.7 (18.8-36.4)

0.5 (0.3-0.8)

0 (0–0)

27.4 (19.2-37.3)

Note: All group comparisons were statistically significant.

Women accumulated slightly more SPA than men, both in minutes per day (105 vs. 101 minutes/day) and when expressed as a fraction of total physical activity (28 vs. 26%). The median minute per day SPA values were 3 to 4 minutes lower in 20–39 year olds than in the older two age groups. However in 60+ year olds, SPA as a fraction of total physical activity was 7 to 8 percentage points higher than in the two younger age groups. Mexican Americans spent 9 to 11 minutes/day less in SPA than non-Hispanic blacks and non-Hispanic whites. SPA did not differ in a meaningful way across normal weight, overweight, and obese groups; however, the underweight group accumulated 7 to 8 minutes/day more SPA than the other BMI groups. The age, race/ethnicity, and BMI patterns noted above were almost entirely attributable to differences in light intensity SPA. These patterns were also consistent when the sample was divided into men (Table 3) and women (Table 4).
Table 3

Median (interquartile range) daily time spent in sporadic physical activity of different intensities, in minutes per day and as a fraction of total physical activity, within men and according to sex, age, race/ethnicity, and body mass index

 

Minutes per day

Fraction of total physical activity (SPA + BPA)

 

Light intensity

Moderate intensity

Vigorous intensity

All intensities

Light intensity

Moderate intensity

Vigorous intensity

All intensities

All Men

97.6 (79.8-114.5)

2.6 (1.4-4.5)

0 (0–0)

100.9 (82.7-118.3)

24.7 (16.8-34.0)

0.6 (0.4-1.1)

0 (0–0)

25.6 (17.4-35.2)

Age

        

 20-39 years

93.4 (72.6-110.7)

3.4 (2.0-5.3)

0 (0–0)

97.9 (76.8-115.8)

21.4 (13.8-30.0)

0.8 (0.4-1.3)

0 (0–0)

22.2 (14.3-31.1)

 40-59 years

99.5 (80.8-116.6)

2.8 (1.8-4.6)

0 (0–0)

102.9 (83.8-121.2)

24.2 (16.8-32.6)

0.7 (0.4-1.2)

0 (0–0)

25.0 (17.5-33.8)

 ≥60 years

101.3 (86.1-117.1)

1.3 (0.6-2.0)

0 (0–0)

103.0 (87.5-118.9)

31.7 (24.2-44.5)

0.4 (0.2-0.7)

0 (0–0)

32.3 (24.7-45.1)

Race/Ethnicity

        

 Non-Hispanic white

98.4 (81.6-114.7)

2.5 (1.4-4.5)

0 (0–0)

101.5 (84.2-118.3)

25.7 (17.6-34.8)

0.6 (0.4-1.1)

0 (0–0)

26.7 (18.4-36.0)

 Non-Hispanic black

100.8 (83.8-118.7)

2.5 (1.5-4.2)

0 (0–0)

103.9 (86.8-120.7)

23.5 (17.2-32.3)

0.6 (0.3-1.0)

0 (0–0)

24.4 (17.6-33.4)

 Mexican American

82.0 (61.2-105.2)

2.7 (1.6-4.0)

0 (0–0)

86.2 (64.9-108.1)

17.1 (10.8-25.8)

0.5 (0.3-0.8)

0 (0–0)

17.7 (11.3-26.6)

 Other

97.5 (76.5-115.9)

3.0 (1.9-4.7)

0 (0–0)

102.1 (78.7-121.0)

24.9 (14.9-36.5)

0.7 (0.4-1.3)

0 (0–0)

25.9 (16.1-37.5)

Body Mass Index

        

 <18.5 kg/m2

109.8 (81.4-122.7)

2.8 (1.5-4.6)

0 (0–0)

114.0 (82.9-127.1)

30.3 (20.8-40.9)

0.8 (0.5-1.1)

0 (0–0)

31.3 (21.6-42.7)

 18.5-24.9 kg/m2

98.2 (78.8-114.6)

2.9 (1.6-4.8)

0 (0–0)

101.3 (83.0-117.7)

23.4 (15.6-33.1)

0.7 (0.4-1.1)

0 (0–0)

24.3 (16.5-34.4)

 25-29.9 kg/m2

97.5 (80.8-114.5)

2.6 (1.4-4.5)

0 (0–0)

100.8 (83.4-119.0)

24.4 (16.8-32.9)

0.6 (0.4-1.1)

0 (0–0)

25.4 (17.4-34.2)

 ≥30 kg/m2

97.2 (79.1-113.8)

2.4 (1.4-4.0)

0 (0–0)

100.3 (81.7-117.3)

25.6 (17.5-35.6)

0.6 (0.3-1.1)

0 (0–0)

26.4 (18.3-36.7)

Note: All group comparisons were statistically significant.

Table 4

Median (interquartile range) daily time spent in sporadic physical activity of different intensities, in minutes per day and as a fraction of total physical activity, within women and according to sex, age, race/ethnicity, and body mass index

 

Minutes per day

Fraction of total physical activity

 

Light intensity

Moderate intensity

Vigorous intensity

All intensities

Light intensity

Moderate intensity

Vigorous intensity

All intensities

All Women

102.9 (86.0-121.0)

1.6 (0.9-2.8)

0 (0–0)

105.2 (88.6-124.1)

27.3 (19.6-35.5)

0.4 (0.2-0.7)

0 (0–0)

27.7 (20.0-36.2)

Age

        

 20-39 years

102.0 (83.8-119.2)

2.4 (1.4-3.9)

0 (0–0)

104.6 (86.2-122.7)

25.7 (17.7-33.0)

0.6 (0.3-1.0)

0 (0–0)

26.6 (18.4-33.8)

 40-59 years

103.4 (87.0-123.1)

1.8 (1.1-2.8)

0 (0–0)

105.6 (89.4-126.3)

25.7 (19.0-33.4)

0.4 (0.3-0.7)

0 (0–0)

26.5 (19.4-34.2)

 ≥60 years

103.6 (88.1-120.2)

0.8 (0.4-1.3)

0 (0–0)

104.7 (89.1-121.4)

32.4 (23.5-44.3)

0.2 (0.1-0.5)

0 (0–0)

32.7 (23.7-44.6)

Race/Ethnicity

        

 Non-Hispanic white

102.8 (86.4-120.6)

1.6 (0.8-2.9)

0 (0–0)

105.0 (89.3-123.1)

27.5 (20.1-35.6)

0.4 (0.2-0.7)

0 (0–0)

28.2 (20.6-36.2)

 Non-Hispanic black

104.1 (86.0-121.0)

1.6 (0.9-2.6)

0 (0–0)

106.7 (88.2-124.7)

27.0 (19.8-35.9)

0.4 (0.2-0.7)

0 (0–0)

27.6 (20.1-36.7)

 Mexican American

98.1 (79.8-118.5)

1.7 (1.0-2.7)

0 (0–0)

100.1 (82.0-120.9)

24.5 (16.2-32.5)

0.4 (0.2-0.7)

0 (0–0)

25.0 (16.6-33.7)

 Other

104.6 (85.6-126.8)

1.7 (1.0-2.6)

0 (0–0)

105.9 (87.3-129.6)

26.7 (17.1-34.5)

0.4 (0.3-0.6)

0 (0–0)

27.1 (17.3-35.5)

Body Mass Index

        

 <18.5 kg/m2

106.1 (85.5-121.1)

2.0 (1.0-3.6)

0 (0–0)

108.3 (90.9-125.6)

29.8 (22.8-42.3)

0.6 (0.3-1.0)

0 (0–0)

31.1 (23.0-43.0)

 18.5-24.9 kg/m2

102.1 (85.2-121.6)

1.8 (0.9-3.0)

0 (0–0)

104.7 (87.6-125.3)

26.7 (19.1-33.7)

0.4 (0.2-0.8)

0 (0–0)

27.3 (19.5-34.5)

 25-29.9 kg/m2

103.6 (88.7-122.2)

1.4 (0.8-2.6)

0 (0–0)

106.0 (90.2-124.1)

27.1 (19.4-35.9)

0.4 (0.2-0.7)

0 (0–0)

27.7 (19.9-36.7)

 ≥30 kg/m2

102.9 (85.8-119.2)

1.6 (0.9-2.6)

0 (0–0)

104.6 (87.5-121.2)

27.9 (19.9-36.8)

0.4 (0.3-0.7)

0 (0–0)

28.6 (20.3-37.4)

Note: All group comparisons were statistically significant with the exception of vigorous intensity minutes in the Non-Hispanic black and Mexican American groups and light intensity minutes in the <18.5 kg/m2 and ≥30 kg/m2 groups.

Given the lack of moderate and vigorous intensity SPA, we decided a posteriori to investigate moderate and vigorous intensity activity embedded within light intensity BPA. This is hereafter referred to as embedded MVPA. Visual inspection of the accelerometer data revealed that many of the light intensity bouts contained some embedded MVPA (see Figure 1 for example). As shown in Table 5, the median value for embedded MVPA within the total sample was 16 minutes/day (IQR: 6–30 minutes/day). Men accumulated twice as much embedded MVPA as women (20 vs. 10 minutes/day) and 20–39 year olds accumulated more embedded MVPA than 40–59 year olds and 60+ year olds. Non-Hispanic blacks accumulated the least amount of embedded MVPA. Median embedded MVPA values were 5 to 8 minutes/day higher in the normal weight and overweight groups than in the underweight and obese groups.
Table 5

Median (interquartile range) minutes per day spent in moderate-to- vigorous intensity physical activity embedded within bouts of light intensity physical activity within the total sample and according to sex, age, race/ethnicity, and body mass index

 

Moderate intensity

Vigorous intensity

Moderate-to-vigorous intensity

Total Sample

14.4 (5.2-28.5)

0.0 (0.0-0.2)

15.5 (5.7-29.7)

Sex

   

 Men

19.8 (8.3-36.2)

0.0 (0.0-0.4)

20.3 (8.5-38.2)

 Women

9.7 (3.3-20.8)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

9.8 (3.4-22.0)

Age

   

 20-39 years

20.5 (10.3-34.5)

0.0 (0.0-0.7)

21.2 (10.8-37.0)

 40-59 years

15.4 (6.5-28.8)

0.0 (0.0-0.2)

15.9 (6.7-29.7)

 ≥60 years

3.3 (0.7-11.4)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

3.3 (0.7-11.4)

Race/Ethnicity

   

 Non-Hispanic white

14.0 (4.7-28.0) a

0.0 (0.0-0.2) a

14.6 (4.8-29.4) a

 Non-Hispanic black

12.6 (4.8-26.2) a

0.0 (0.0-0.2) a

12.7 (4.9-27.6) a

 Mexican American

18.8 (8.4-37.0) b

0.0 (0.0-0.3) a

19.2 (8.5-38.0) b

 Other

15.1 (6.6-29.0) b

0.0 (0.0-0.2) a

15.3 (6.7-30.7) b

Body Mass Index

   

 <18.5 kg/m2

12.0 (4.8-23.5) a

0.0 (0.0-0.2) ab

12.2 (4.8-24.0) a

 18.5-24.9 kg/m2

17.1 (6.6-33.2) b

0.0 (0.0-0.6) b

18.3 (6.8-35.3) b

 25-29.9 kg/m2

16.0 (5.8-29.7) b

0.0 (0.0-0.2) a

16.7 (5.9-30.9) b

 ≥30 kg kg/m2

10.2 (3.5-21.7) a

0.0 (0.0-0.0) a

10.3 (3.5-22) a

Note: All group comparisons were statistically significant unless the median (interquartile range) is followed by an aor bsymbol. Groups with the same letter symbols were not statistically different from each other.

Discussion

This representative sample of American adults spent 103 minutes/day engaging in SPA of any intensity, which represented 27% of their total (SPA + BPA) physical activity. Only 3 minutes/day of the SPA was of a moderate-to-vigorous intensity; however, the sample accumulated another 16 minutes/day of MVPA embedded within bouts of primarily light intensity activity. Although there were statistically significant differences in SPA across age, sex, ethnicity and BMI groups; these differences were small and primarily due to light intensity SPA.

Our finding that moderate-to-vigorous SPA represents 13% of total MVPA in American adults is lower than what has been reported previously. Within the Third Generation Cohort of the Framingham Heart Study, mean sporadic MVPA was 19 minutes/day, which represented 68% of total MVPA time[9]. Within a representative sample of Canadian adults, sporadic MVPA accounted for 53% of total MVPA energy expenditure[10]. In a representative sample of youth[14] and a small convenience sample of older adults[15] sporadic MVPA accounted for 66% of total MVPA time. The difference between our findings and previous findings is likely explained in large measure by differences in how SPA was classified. Specifically, in previous studies all MVPA occurring outside of bouted MVPA was considered sporadic. Conversely, in our study we calculated two forms of non-bouted physical MVPA; MVPA that was truly sporadic and MVPA that was embedded within bouts of primarily light intensity activity. While the truly sporadic MVPA only accounted for 2 minutes/day or 13% of total MVPA, the truly sporadic and embedded MVPA combined accounted for 17 minutes/day or 98% of total MVPA in the typical participant.

We feel that it is important to differentiate between MVPA that is truly sporadic and MVPA that is embedded within bouts of primarily light intensity activity as they may influence health differently and act through different biological mechanisms. True SPA may play a role in breaking up extended sedentary periods. Recent studies have shown that the frequency of breaks in sedentary periods is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors[2527]. Conversely, MVPA embedded within light intensity bouts may impact health primarily by increasing energy expenditure. As the majority of American adults do not engage in sports[28, 29] that are known to contain a mixture of different movement intensities[30], it is likely that a major source of embedded MVPA in adults is through occupational activity. For example, a farmer may spend a large amount of time in light intensity activity walking around the farm then perform short bursts of higher intensity activity in the form of animal tending or hay bailing.

It is encouraging that the typical American adult accumulates 17 minutes/day of non-bouted MVPA, particularly given that they spend an average of <10 min/day in bouted MVPA[20], a volume of MVPA that falls well below that recommended for good health[35]. Non-bouted or SPA may also represent another intervention opportunity. SPA may be easier to intervene upon in populations without the free time to participate in BPA. That is, it may be easier for people to add a few minutes of physical activity here and there throughout the day rather than devoting a single longer block of time (eg, 30 minutes) to getting their activity. Also, SPA may provide an intervention opportunity for people who do not have the confidence or belief in their ability to participate in extended BPA. Doing a little bit of activity here and there may be perceived as being easier and less intimidating than bouts of activity. SPA based interventions also may have potential for greater maintenance of physical activity behavior post intervention, which is a known problem for BPA interventions[31].

Key limitations of this study warrant recognition. The physical activity patterns observed in this sample from 2003–2006 may not represent current behavior. While accelerometers provide an objective measure of physical activity, they are not without fault. They do not accurately capture activities that are not step based (i.e. cycling, swimming, upper body activities), and the accelerometers used in NHANES were uniaxial and primarily captured horizontal movement at the hip. Nonetheless, we feel that a vast majority of physical activity was captured since walking is the most common form of leisure-time physical activity[32] and is heavily involved in occupational and transportation activities. Conversely, less than 2% of Americans engage in strength training and cycling[28].

Conclusion

SPA of any intensity accounted for 27% of total daily physical activity in Americans adults. Sporadic MVPA and MVPA embedded within light intensity bouts accounted for 98% of total MVPA. Future research is needed to better understand the types of activity that represent embedded MVPA patterns, and to investigate if sporadic MVPA and embedded MVPA have a different impact on health outcomes.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Funding for this project was provided by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. IJ was supported by a Canada Research Chair award.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University
(2)
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University

References

  1. Brownson RC, Boehmer TK, Luke DA: Declining rates of physical activity in the United States: what are the contributors?Annu Rev Public Health 2005, 26:421–43. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144437View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS: Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence.CMAJ 2006,174(6):801–9. 10.1503/cmaj.051351View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Tremblay MS, Warburton DE, Janssen I, Paterson DH, Latimer AE, Rhodes RE, et al.: New Canadian physical activity guidelines.Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2011,36(1):36–46. 10.1139/H11-009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al.: Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association.Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007,39(8):1423–34. 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. World Health Organization: Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.Google Scholar
  6. Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS: Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey.Health Rep 2011,22(1):7–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tucker JM, Welk GJ, Beyler NK: Physical activity in U.S.: adults compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.Am J Prev Med 2011,40(4):454–61. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Strath SJ, Holleman RG, Ronis DL, Swartz AM, Richardson CR: Objective physical activity accumulation in bouts and nonbouts and relation to markers of obesity in US adults.Prev Chronic Dis 2008,5(4):A131.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Glazer NL, Lyass A, Esliger DW, Blease SJ, Freedson PS, Massaro JM, et al.: Sustained and shorter bouts of physical activity are related to cardiovascular health.Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013,45(1):109–15. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31826beae5View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke J, Janssen I: Sporadic and Bouted Physical Activity and the Metabolic Syndrome in Adults.Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014,46(1):76–83. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31829f83a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergman P, Grjibovski AM, Hagstromer M, Bauman A, Sjostrom M: Adherence to physical activity recommendations and the influence of socio-demographic correlates - a population-based cross-sectional study.BMC Public Health 2008, 8:367. 10.1186/1471-2458-8-367View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJ, Martin BW: Lancet Physical Activity Series Working G: Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not?Lancet 2012,380(9838):258–71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Brown W: Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update.Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002,34(12):1996–2001. 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00020View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mark AE, Janssen I: Influence of bouts of physical activity on overweight in youth.Am J Prev Med 2009,36(5):416–21. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.027View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Copeland JL, Esliger DW: Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in active, healthy older adults.J Aging Phys Act 2009,17(1):17–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, et al.: Objectively measured light-intensity physical activity is independently associated with 2-h plasma glucose.Diabetes Care 2007,30(6):1384–9. 10.2337/dc07-0114View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Katzmarzyk PT: Standing and mortality in a prospective cohort of Canadian adults.Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014,46(5):940–6. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000198View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. 2003–2006 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes_questionnaires.htm
  19. World Health Organization: Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation.World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000, 894:1–253.Google Scholar
  20. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M: Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer.Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008,40(1):181–8. 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Colley R, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay MS: Quality control and data reduction procedures for accelerometry-derived measures of physical activity.Health Rep 2010,21(1):63–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, Buchowski MS: Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm.Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011,43(2):357–64. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR: Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research.Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005,37(11 Suppl):S531–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Masse LC, Fuemmeler BF, Anderson CB, Matthews CE, Trost SG, Catellier DJ, et al.: Accelerometer data reduction: a comparison of four reduction algorithms on select outcome variables.Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005,37(11 Suppl):S544–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, et al.: Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk.Diabetes Care 2008,31(4):661–6. 10.2337/dc07-2046View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bankoski A, Harris TB, McClain JJ, Brychta RJ, Caserotti P, Chen KY, et al.: Sedentary activity associated with metabolic syndrome independent of physical activity.Diabetes Care 2011,34(2):497–503. 10.2337/dc10-0987View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Carson V, Wong SL, Winkler E, Healy GN, Colley RC, Tremblay MS: Patterns of sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk among Canadian adults.Prev Med 2014, 65C:23–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tudor-Locke C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT: Frequently reported activities by intensity for U.S. adults: the American Time Use Survey.Am J Prev Med 2011 2010,41(2):238–8.Google Scholar
  29. Ham SA, Kruger J, Tudor-Locke C: Participation by US adults in sports, exercise, and recreational physical activities.J Phys Act Health 2009,6(1):6–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Guagliano JM, Rosenkranz RR, Kolt GS: Girls’ physical activity levels during organized sports in Australia.Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013,45(1):116–22. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31826a0a73View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fjeldsoe B, Neuhaus M, Winkler E, Eakin E: Systematic review of maintenance of behavior change following physical activity and dietary interventions.Health Psychol 2011,30(1):99–109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Siegel PZ, Brackbill RM, Heath GW: The epidemiology of walking for exercise: implications for promoting activity among sedentary groups.Am J Public Health 1995,85(5):706–10. 10.2105/AJPH.85.5.706View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/2052-1847/7/2/prepub

Copyright

© Robson and Janssen; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement