Skip to main content

CRBP-TS - evaluation of a home-based training and health care program for colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer using telemonitoring and self-management: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Physical training is recommended in various national and international guidelines for patients with cancer. Observational studies have shown that physical activity leads to reduced recurrence and mortality rates by 20–40% in colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer. Despite existing evidence, a systematic care structure is still lacking. The primary aim of this study is to implement and evaluate an online training platform to strengthen physical performance and patient empowerment after cancer surgery.

Methods

The evaluation will be conducted as a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial with three subgroups (colorectal-, breast-, and prostate cancer). Each group will include 100 patients (total 300 patients including dropouts; clinical stages T1–3 and/or N+; M0 after surgery intervention) and the primary endpoint (13% increase in the maximal oxygen consumption during exercise) will be examined. The intervention group will receive a 6-month home-based online training (2–3 times per week strength-endurance training using video presentations), bidirectional activity feedback information, online communication, and online counseling. The control group (usual care) will be advised lifestyle improvement. In-hospital testing will be performed before, during, and after the intervention. In addition to cardiopulmonary capacity, tumor specific diagnostics (liquid biopsy, depression and fatigue assessment, metabolic and endothelial screening) will be applied.

Discussion

Due to the increasing incidence of cancer, associated with considerable mortality, morbidity and impaired quality of life, there is an imperative requirement for improved cancer care, of which structured physical training may become an integral component.

Trial registration

DRKS-ID: DRKS00020499; Registered 17 March 2020.

Peer Review reports

Background

Prostate cancer and breast cancer are the most common malignant tumors in men and women, respectively with approximately 60,000–70,000 new cases each per year in Germany. Colorectal carcinoma affects women and men with an increasing incidence of approximately 60,000 new cases per year [1]. The etiology of these malignancies is multifactorial. It includes genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors such as nutrition, alcohol consumption, and smoking. Physical inactivity can increase cancer mortality [2]. Therefore, regular exercise is one of the most effective cancer prevention mechanisms [3,4,5]. Exercise also has a positive effect on the prevention of cancer recurrence. Regular training has been shown to result in a reduction of approximately 20–40% in the risk for colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. A strong positive correlation has been demonstrated between weekly energy consumption [10] and cardiorespiratory fitness [13] and tumor-related mortality rate [14]. In addition, regular training has been shown to improve cancer-related symptoms such as fatigue, muscle loss, metabolic syndrome and diabetes, and chronic cardiovascular inflammation. The benefits of regular training are also applicable to comorbidities such as anxiety disorders, depression [15], cognitive deficits, and dementia [16], which can further impair quality of life and therapeutic adherence of patients [17].

The World Health Organization, the European Society for Medical Oncology and the American Cancer Society recommend at least 150 min of moderate exercise or 75 min of vigorous exercise per week for all adults for primary and tertiary cancer prevention.

However, in patients undergoing chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or cancer surgery, these recommendations are often not fully applicable and must be adapted to the patients’ individual level of performance. Consequently, training mode, training frequency, and intensity must be individually set according to personal performance and adapted according to the postsurgical conditions. Further individual adaptions are also necessary in the course of the therapy [18]. Essential factors to maintain the patients’ adherence to the training program include ongoing personal support, consideration of patients’ individual capability with thorough online training adjustment, and a bidirectional communication with the counseling team.

Training-associated decrease in cancer-related mortality rates is multifactorial. Several pathways and mechanisms have been discussed previously, which include regulation of tumor growth via phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway [19], microRNA regulation [19, 20], decrease in circulating tumor cells [21], more consistent application of chemotherapy [22], attenuated epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor cell migration [23], and altered DNA methylation [24].

The available literature is primarily based on questionnaire surveys, instructions for lifestyle changes, and qualitative implementation of the training programs with subjective assessment of the intensity [25]. Despite the strong evidence and the preventive and regenerative efficiency of physical training, systematic implementation or adequate care structure are lacking in cancer therapy.

The ColoRectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancer - Telemonitoring and Self-management project (CRBP-TS) addresses these issues. The study aims to combine online-supported training, automated recording of activity and performance parameters, cross-sectoral bidirectional data evaluation, and online communication based on an electronic case file, which is accessible to patients as well as physicians. The objective of this study is to implement and evaluate an online training platform to strengthen physical performance and patient empowerment after cancer surgery. The primary outcome is 13% increase in maximal oxygen consumption during exercise (VO2 max) in the intervention group (IG) when compared with the control group (CG) after training for 6 months.

Methods

Study design and ethical approval

This prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial is organized by the Institute of Sport Medicine and Prevention, University of Leipzig, Germany and the Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Germany. The study is approved by the Ethical Committee of the Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig (reference number 056/20-ek) and will be conducted in accordance with the principles in the latest revision of the Declaration of Helsinki. Any modifications to the study protocol will require a formal amendment to the protocol. The study has undergone external peer-review by the funding body and is funded by the State Ministry for Higher Education, Research and the Arts, Free State of Saxony, Germany.

Study group, screening, and recruitment

The patients will be screened, informed, and included in the study at three University Hospitals in Germany (Dresden, Leipzig, and Hannover Medical School). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The target groups of the study are cancer patients with International Classification of Diseases codes C18/19/20 (colorectal cancer), C50 (breast cancer), and C61 (prostate cancer) who underwent curative (R0) surgery at stages T1N0M0 to T3N3M0. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The patients will be informed and educated postoperatively before discharge from the hospital about program content and aims, randomization, and the consequences for the control group by the study team or the clinic stuff. Individuals interested in participating will then provide written informed consent after a sufficient period for reflection and further verbal discussion with an investigator. Participant insurance was contracted for study-related harm to study participants.

Table 1 Inclusion criteria
Table 2 Exclusion criteria

Randomization

Patients will be randomly assigned to the intervention group (IG) or the control group (CG) following a 1:1 allocation by the Clinical Trial Centre, Leipzig. Randomization will be stratified by using a dynamic minimization algorithm with two factors: the cancer entity (colorectal, breast, or prostate carcinoma) and the gender (only by colorectal carcinoma). Allocation concealment will be ensured by independence of the randomization service and release of the results after recruitment. Recruitment will be spread over 6 months with a subsequent 6-month intervention phase (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Study flow chart (IG: intervention group, CG: control group, V: visit)

Objectives and endpoints

The objective of this interventional trial is to determine the effect of a continuously supervised post-surgery online training and lifestyle modification program on patients’ physical and psychological status. Short-term and intermediate-term aims are to increase the cardiopulmonary performance and muscle mass, to reduce abdominal fat, to improve the quality of life, and to reduce depression and fatigue. The recurrence rate and mortality will be addressed in the long term.

The primary endpoint is a 13% increase in the VO2 max in the IG when compared with the CG after training for 6 months.

Secondary endpoints after 6 months of online training and lifestyle improvement are as follows.

  • Significant decrease in re-hospitalization (decrease by absolute 15%) in the IG when compared with the CG

  • Significant improvement in the quality of life, fatigue, and depression (improvement in scores by absolute 10%) in the IG, which is assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QoLQ-C30, disease specific adaptation)

  • Increase in the metabolic rate by 500 kcal (500 Met/min) per week in the IG when compared with the CG

  • Increase in patients’ compliance to 95% in the IG

  • Improvement/decrease in tumor-associated marker panel

Sample size calculation

The sample size was calculated according to the expected effect on the primary endpoint (13% increase in VO2 max) in the IG when compared with the CG in 6 months [28, 29] for each cancer subgroup. Sample size calculation was based on a power of 0.80 with a two-sided test and an alpha of 0.05. The increase was calculated with respect to the change in the baseline characteristics of IG patients when compared with CG patients, with delta VO2 max of 3.6 ml/kg/min, a standard deviation of 5 ml/kg/min, and an average VO2 max of 27.5 ml/kg/min at baseline. Thus, the required sample size for each group (IG and CG) of each cancer entity (colorectal, breast, and prostate) was 40. Considering an expected dropout rate of 20%, 50 patients will be recruited (oversampling) for each group and entity. Considering 100 patients (50 in the IG and 50 in the CG) for each cancer entity, 300 patients will be included in the study.

Study organization

The central components of this new type of care are cross-linked care points (cCPs), which are located in the respective university hospitals. Their tasks include local project administration (patient recruitment, data collection) and medical health care supply (diagnostics, briefing, telemonitoring support, and cross-sectoral communication). Each cCP will consist of an interdisciplinary team (a physician, a sports scientist, and a cancer nurse). It will care for approximately 100 patients (50 patients each from the CG and the IG).

The medical duties within the cCP will include primary and follow-up care before and after the surgery and in-hospital rehabilitation immediately after the intervention period and 6 month after the intervention. The tasks will include data acquisition, medical supervision of the online program and training, management of patients’ information, structured tumor aftercare in accordance with the respective tumor guidelines, tele-support, and feedback to the referring ambulant physician. The responsibilities of sport scientists will include individual configuration of the intervention program (training and nutrition) and tele-support. The cancer nurses will perform the tasks of patient screening, management of patient information and patient inclusion, monitoring the online program, reporting of vital parameters and clinical chemistry, tele-support, data collection during and after the training, and central data management.

Cross-sectoral patient file and CRBP-TS application

The organizational and information technology center of the project will include the electronic cross-sectoral patient file (ESP) and the CRBP-TS application. At baseline, the CRBP-TS mobile application will be downloaded in each participant’s tablet (Lenovo Tab M10 TB-X606X; Lenovo, Hongkong, China) and connected to the activity device (Vivoactive 4; Garmin, Olathe, Kansas, US) via Bluetooth. The activity device will be wear 24 h a day during the entire study period. The CRBP-TS application will be regularly used by the participant to transfer activity tracker and heart rate (chest belt) data via Bluetooth throughout the intervention, to complete questionnaires, and to visualize the home-based training in the intervention group. An automatic data transfer from patient to ESP is provided via an internet access (LTE, Deutsche Telekom AG, Germany) at the tablet divice. The ESP will serve as an electronically case report form (CRF) and will contain the medical report files, patients’ training data, measurements, and manual entries. The data will be prepared and provided to the participating care institutions. Patients will also be able to view their training, fitness, and body composition data.

Data management and statistical analysis

In the CRBP-TS study, all data will be entered to the ESP at the participating site. All questionnaires will be completed on a dedicated application CRBP-TS and merge to the ESP. There will not be a formal data monitoring committee for this study, however monitoring will be provided by the trail administration stuff, including overall project supervision and progress monitoring. The clinical research assistant will verify all consent forms, compliance with established protocol and procedures, and data quality in the ESP. Following quality control measures, the input data will be locked in the database. Participant files will be maintained in the storage for a period of 10 years after the completion of the study. The access to the ESP will be secured (personal ID and password required) with different levels of security depending on the role of the investigator. The Principal Investigator will be given access to the cleaned data sets.

The evaluation will be performed by an “intent to treat” analysis using all randomized patients in the entity subgroups. For the evaluation, established statistical programs and common statistical analysis methods for longitudinal regression models (such as mixed model with repeated measures) will be used. The intervention arm will be compared with the control arm with respect to all primary analyses and all visits.

Individual study plan, measurements, and data collection

A period of 6 months is planned for the recruitment of participants. The intervention period will be of 6 months. Data collection will be performed at baseline (appointment 1a will include examinations and appointment 1b will include instruction course), at 3 months (appointment 2), and at 6 months (appointment 3, end of the study). After 12 months, a follow-up investigation (appointment 4) will be conducted. The IG will undergo individual training intervention and counseling, while patients from the CG will be provided with standard care as well as comprehensive information regarding health-promoting measures. The daily activity of patients in the IG and the CG will be measured and evaluated by the CRBP-TS application. An overview of the examinations during the study visits is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure2

Data collection schedule for the CRBP-TS Study (SV: screening visit; EDTA: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; PYTPAQ: Past Year Total Physical Activity Questionnaire; OHIP: Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire; QLQ-C30: Quality of Life; FSS: Fatigue Severity Scale; PHY2 & 9: Patient Health Questionnaire; WHO-5: well-being index; ESP: electronical cross-sectoral patient file)

The recorded parameters will be stored in the ESP by the cCP or entered by the patients themselves via online questionnaires. To enable the measurement of secondary outcomes, patients from the IG and the CG will receive a wearable device, which will quantify the activity behavior during the entire study period.

At the instruction course (appointment 1b), all patients will receive information about the study program and about the handling of the software and hardware components (tablet with CRBP-TS application, wearable device, instructions about the CRBP-TS application) in small groups.

After 3 months, the first follow-up examination (appointment 2) will be conducted, which will include an incremental exertion test, laboratory analysis (clinical chemistry, tumor markers, inflammation panel), and bioimpedance measurement.

In the final examination (end of the study, appointment 3) after 6 months, all examinations performed at baseline will be repeated.

After 12 months, another follow-up examination (appointment 4) will be conducted in which the measurements from appointment 2 will be repeated.

During the intervention period, physical activity in the IG and the CG will be recorded by a fitness tracker. This assessment will include total calories, resting metabolic rate, number of steps, heart rate (during the training intervention), and sleep quality (length and duration of sleep phases).

In addition, patients will record the intake of their medications using binary confirmation (medications taken or not taken) every morning via the CRBP-TS application. All data will be automatically transferred to the ESP.

The baseline examination (appointment 1a) will include the following measurements.

  1. 1.

    Incremental exertion test

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing to assess oxygen uptake (VO2) and maximal power output will perform on an electronically braked semi-recumbent ergometer. The initial load will be 30 W with 10 W/min increments until subjective or objective exhaustion or the occurrence of the termination criteria [30]. After the exercise period follows a 5-min recovery period. Measurement parameters will include ventilation, oxygen uptake (breath by breathy analysis, Dynostics, Sicada GmbH, Germany), oxygen saturation, heart rate (electrocardiogram), blood pressure, cardiac output (measured by impedance cardiography, PhysioFlow Q-Link, Manatec Biomedical, France), blood lactate concentration and rating of perceived exertion. Measurement of cardiac output will not be performed in patients with contraindication to impedance measurement (pacemakers).

  1. 2.

    Endothelial function

Flow mediated dilation will be measured by the determination of diameter and flow velocity in the brachial artery before and after forearm compression above systolic pressure for 5 min [31].

  1. 3.

    Anthropometry

Height and body mass will be used to calculate body mass index and body surface area. Waist circumference will be assessed at the mid-point between the iliac crest and lowest rib according to standard techniques. Segmental bioimpedance measurement will be measured to calculate lean body mass and fat mass.

  1. 4.

    Clinical chemistry and inflammation marker panel

Blood sampling will be performed from baseline (V1) to 6 months (V3) to enable translational research and to assess potential predictive factors of outcomes. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid plasma, serum and cell-free DNA BCT® will be collected, centrifuged, and stored at − 80 °C until analysis. Inflammatory cytokine levels, immune cell assessment, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, and tumor necrosis factor alpha will be quantified. Adipose and metabolic markers will include hemoglobin A1c, leptin, adiponectin, insulin, and c-peptide.

  1. 5.

    Tumor markers and liquid biopsies

Tumor entity-specific microRNA, circulating free DNA, and circulating tumor DNA; prostate-specific antigen; carcinoembryonic antigen; carbohydrate antigen 15–3; and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 will be determined.

  1. 6.

    Questionnaires

The questionnaires will include entity-specific quality of life (EORTC QoLQ-C30), depression (yes/no type Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale), and fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale) risk screening for colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer. Preoperative leisure activity (Past Year Total Physical Activity Questionnaire), WHO-5 (well-being index) and dental care/periodontal status (Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire) will also be recorded.

Intervention

Intervention group

Using the CRBP-TS application, patients from the IG will receive a complex training and lifestyle improvement program. The exercise training will consist of indication-specific, individualized, heart rate-limited, and online-supported strength-endurance home training with primary focus on improving oxygen capacity using video presentations calibrated according to oxygen consumption. Individual entry and follow-up levels will be used. The follow-up levels will be based on patients’ individual performance development measured by their wearable devices. All exercise adaptions will be supervised by the cCP team.

Details of the training intervention (2–3 times per week for 30 min) are as follows.

  • Individualized video-home training with feedback information to patients and the cCP: The strength-endurance training based on the initial examination using an online video presentation with indication-specific focuses. Four rounds with five different body-weight exercises (upper and lower body) with 40 s loading and 20 s of recovery phase will be performed. Between rounds there will be a 60 s break. The intensity of the exercise is individually adjustable. Training videos will be changed and modified weekly to provide training variety, and progression.

  • Individualized outdoor endurance training: Depending on patients’ interests supervised endurance training (such as jogging, walking, cycling, fitness facilities, rehabilitation sports) with activity recording and heart rate monitoring should be implemented.

Details of the lifestyle intervention and patient empowerment are as follows.

  • Structured information on general health improvement, disease prevention, and lifestyle changes (diet, exercise, anti-inflammatory prophylaxis, new therapy options, fatigue, depression, and self-perception) provided by the cCP team via the CRBP-TS application.

  • Advice and appointment reminders (such as reminders about taking medication or failed training) via short message service or e-mail

  • Online feedback of key parameters (training success in strength and endurance training, performance, heart rate)

During the 6-month intervention, patients will have regular appointments with their outpatient physicians. All physicians will be able to access the ESP and the data summaries including the online monitoring and training data. The outcomes will be discussed with the patients if needed. An interdisciplinary online conference will be conducted every 4 months, which will include family doctors, medical specialists, and the cCP team.

Control group

Patients in the CG will receive standard care over a period of 6 months. After inclusion, they will receive general information about necessary lifestyle changes according to the current guidelines. Further course of the study will be analogous to the course followed by the IG.

Safety analyses

The safety assessment includes observation and recording of any grade of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) during the study, as well as the results of laboratory analyses and clinical examination. Participants in the exercise training group will also be asked about the occurrence of an AE at each training session. The researchers are responsible to take appropriate measures for the AE and determine the causal relationships between the adverse events and the exercise intervention.

Discussion

The main objective of this prospective randomized controlled study is to evaluate the systematic use of a home-based physical training and lifestyle intervention module with a multidirectional online monitoring tool supervised by specific clinic staff. Monitoring will include therapy adherence, physical and mental capacity, and efficiency of lifestyle changes. The exemplary care will be planned and continuously adapted at the cCPs consisting of specialized staff (doctor, cancer nurse, sports scientist) based on the ESP files that include findings, training, and measurement data.

Several studies on colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer patients have shown that physical training results in a 20–40% relative risk reduction for recurrence and tumor-associated mortality [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Therefore, guidelines consistently include the systematic use of physical training in postoperative therapy, with high relevance for the majority of the tumor entities. A balanced combination of strength and endurance training would be highly effective in reducing short-term and intermediate-term tumor-associated morbidity, recurrence, and metastases [18]. Positive effects have also been demonstrated for general cancer symptoms and comorbidities [13, 15, 17]. The existing literature primarily consists of questionnaire surveys based on instructions for lifestyle changes and qualitative implementation of the training programs. Despite the protective, therapeutic, and regenerative efficiency of physical training, a systematic implementation strategy is still lacking. Although physical training also results in significant improvement in several comorbidities, this effective therapy option is currently not used to its full potential.

Essential factors for motivation and high adherence to a training intervention include constant supervision, individual dosage based on personal requirements (overweight and joint problems), and fewer impediments (distance, shame). The best results can be expected from a permanent connection between instructors and patients, preferably online. A supervised program guidance is beneficial for most patients [32]. Additionally, patients should also be able to follow their performance development and clinical findings to maintain motivation. This requires bidirectional online communication, a comprehensible presentation of all findings, and telephone communication with patients if necessary. Objective activity monitoring must be integrated into the process.

CRBP-TS address these issues and offer a cross-sectoral implementation of monitoring, training, and lifestyle (patient empowerment) based on a comprehensive online application (CRBP-TS application). This care structure is independent of patients’ individual living conditions and offers safety and efficiency even in rural areas. In addition to the home-based online intervention, the CRBP-TS study includes comprehensive general and tumor-specific diagnostics (cardiopulmonary performance, liquid biopsy, metabolism, tumor marker panel, circulating tumor DNA, circulating microRNA, and cytokines).

Current studies have shown a correlation of periodontitis with an increased general [33,34,35] and entity-specific mortality risk for breast, colon, rectum, and prostate carcinomas [34, 36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Therefore, dental screening is also a part of the present study.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized and prospective study focusing on cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes as well as molecular genetic effects based on the quantified dosage of therapeutic training for CRBP tumor entities. Due to increasing incidence of malignant diseases, poor prognosis, and considerable impairment in the quality of life, there is a need for improvement in cancer care. CRBP-TS project is of economic as well as of social and ethical importance. Due to the short observation period of 6 months and the correlation between mortality and exercise capacity, VO2 max will be used as the primary endpoint. Mortality and recurrence rate will be observed as secondary endpoints, requiring longer follow-up.

Trial status

Protocol version - Date and version identifier: Issue Date 30 March 2020.

The recruitment started in August 2020 and will be approximately completed in June 2021.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during the present study can be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The trail results will be communicated via publications.

Change history

  • 07 April 2021

    Open access funding declaration has been updated

Abbreviations

AE:

Adverse event

cCP:

Cross-linked care points

CG:

Control group

CRBP-TS:

Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancer - Telemonitoring and Self-management

CRF:

Case report form

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

EORTC:

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

ESP:

Electronic cross-sectoral patient-file

FSS:

Fatigue Severity Scale

IG:

Intervention group

kcal:

Kilocalorie

LTE:

Long Term Evolution

min:

Minute

OHIP:

Oral Health Impact Profile

PHY2 & 9:

Patient Health Questionnaires

PYTPAQ:

Past Year Total Physical Activity Questionnaire

QoLQ-C30:

Quality of life questionnaire

RNA:

Ribonucleic acid

SAE:

Serious adverse event

VO2max:

Maximal oxygen uptake

WHO-5:

World Health Organization well-being index

References

  1. 1.

    Quante AS, Ming C, Rottmann M, Engel J, Boeck S, Heinemann V, et al. Projections of cancer incidence and cancer-related deaths in Germany by 2020 and 2030. Cancer Med. 2016;5:2649–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Slattery ML. Physical activity and colorectal Cancer. Sports Med. 2004;34:239–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Volaklis KA, Halle M, Tokmakidis SP. Exercise in the prevention and rehabilitation of breast cancer. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013;125:297–301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shaw E, Farris MS, Stone CR, Derksen JWG, Johnson R, Hilsden RJ, et al. Effects of physical activity on colorectal cancer risk among family history and body mass index subgroups: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pernar CH, Ebot EM, Pettersson A, Graff RE, Giunchi F, Ahearn TU, et al. A prospective study of the association between physical activity and risk of prostate Cancer defined by clinical features and TMPRSS2:ERG. Eur Urol. 2019;76:33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bertram LAC, Stefanick ML, Saquib N, Natarajan L, Patterson RE, Bardwell W, et al. Physical activity, additional breast cancer events, and mortality among early-stage breast cancer survivors: findings from the WHEL study. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22:427–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Richman EL, Kenfield SA, Stampfer MJ, Paciorek A, Carroll PR, Chan JM. Physical activity after diagnosis and risk of prostate Cancer progression: data from the Cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor. Cancer Res. 2011;71:3889–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bao P-P, Zhao G-M, Shu X-O, Peng P, Cai H, Lu W, et al. Modifiable lifestyle factors and triple-negative breast Cancer survival: a population-based prospective study. Epidemiology. 2015;26:909–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Friedenreich CM, Wang Q, Neilson HK, Kopciuk KA, McGregor SE, Courneya KS. Physical activity and survival after prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2016;70:576–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Courneya KS, Vardy JL, O’Callaghan CJ, Friedenreich CM, Campbell KL, Prapavessis H, et al. Effects of a structured exercise program on physical activity and fitness in Colon Cancer survivors: one year feasibility results from the CHALLENGE trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016;25:969–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Walter V, Jansen L, Knebel P, Chang-Claude J, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Physical activity and survival of colorectal cancer patients: population-based study from Germany. Int J Cancer. 2017;140:1985–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lahart IM, Metsios GS, Nevill AM, Carmichael AR. Physical activity, risk of death and recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:635–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Schmid D, Leitzmann MF. Cardiorespiratory fitness as predictor of cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:272–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Friedenreich CM, Shaw E, Neilson HK, Brenner DR. Epidemiology and biology of physical activity and cancer recurrence. J Mol Med. 2017;95:1029–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Golsteijn RHJ, Bolman C, Volders E, Peels DA, de Vries H, Lechner L. Short-term efficacy of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention for prostate and colorectal cancer patients and survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15:106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Oberste M, Schaffrath N, Schmidt K, Bloch W, Jäger E, Steindorf K, et al. Protocol for the “Chemobrain in motion – study” (CIM – study): a randomized placebo-controlled trial of the impact of a high-intensity interval endurance training on cancer related cognitive impairments in women with breast cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1071.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Khan NF, Mant D, Carpenter L, Forman D, Rose PW. Long-term health outcomes in a British cohort of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer survivors: a database study. Br J Cancer. 2011;105 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S29-37.

  18. 18.

    Friedenreich CM, Neilson HK, Farris MS, Courneya KS. Physical activity and cancer outcomes: a precision medicine approach. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:4766–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Agostini D, Natalucci V, Baldelli G, De Santi M, Donati Zeppa S, Vallorani L, et al. New insights into the role of exercise in inhibiting mTOR signaling in triple-negative breast Cancer. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:5896786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dufresne S, Rébillard A, Muti P, Friedenreich CM, Brenner DR. A review of physical activity and circulating miRNA expression: implications in Cancer risk and progression. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2018;27:11–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Brown JC, Rhim AD, Manning SL, Brennan L, Mansour AI, Rustgi AK, et al. Effects of exercise on circulating tumor cells among patients with resected stage I-III colon cancer. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0204875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jones LW, Fels DR, West M, Allen JD, Broadwater G, Barry WT, et al. Modulation of circulating angiogenic factors and tumor biology by aerobic training in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2013;6:925–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ma, YHV, Xu, L, Mei, X, Middleton, K, You, L. Mechanically stimulated osteocytes reduce the bone‐metastatic potential of breast cancer cells in vitro by signaling through endothelial cells. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:7590–601.

  24. 24.

    McCullough LE, Chen J, Cho YH, Khankari NK, Bradshaw PT, White AJ, et al. Modification of the association between recreational physical activity and survival after breast cancer by promoter methylation in breast cancer-related genes. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Groen WG, van Harten WH, Vallance JK. Systematic review and meta-analysis of distance-based physical activity interventions for cancer survivors (2013-2018): we still haven’t found what we’re looking for. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;69:188–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Watson YI, Arfken CL, Birge SJ. Clock completion: an objective screening test for dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41:1235–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Adamsen L, Midtgaard J, Rorth M, Borregaard N, Andersen C, Quist M, et al. Feasibility, physical capacity, and health benefits of a multidimensional exercise program for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2003;11:707–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    De Backer IC, Van Breda E, Vreugdenhil A, Nijziel MR, Kester AD, Schep G. High-intensity strength training improves quality of life in cancer survivors. Acta Oncol. 2007;46:1143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Trappe HJ, Löllgen H. Guidelines for ergometry. German Society of Cardiology--Heart and Cardiovascular Research. Z Kardiol. 2000;89:821–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Peretz A, Leotta DF, Sullivan JH, Trenga CA, Sands FN, Aulet MR, et al. Flow mediated dilation of the brachial artery: an investigation of methods requiring further standardization. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2007;7:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Fox L, Cahill F, Burgess C, Peat N, Rudman S, Kinsella J, et al. Real world evidence: a quantitative and qualitative glance at participant feedback from a free-response survey investigating experiences of a structured exercise intervention for men with prostate Cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3507124.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Arora M, Weuve JL, Fall K, Pedersen NL, Mucci LA. An exploration of shared genetic risk factors between periodontal disease and cancers: a prospective co-twin study. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171:253–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Nwizu NN, Marshall JR, Moysich K, Genco RJ, Hovey KM, Mai X, et al. Periodontal disease and incident Cancer risk among postmenopausal women: results from the Women’s health initiative observational cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2017;26:1255–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Heikkilä P, But A, Sorsa T, Haukka J. Periodontitis and cancer mortality: register-based cohort study of 68,273 adults in 10-year follow-up. Int J Cancer. 2018;142:2244–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lee J-H, Kweon HH-I, Choi J-K, Kim Y-T, Choi S-H. Association between periodontal disease and prostate cancer: results of a 12-year longitudinal cohort study in South Korea. J Cancer. 2017;8:2959–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lee D, Jung KU, Kim HO, Kim H, Chun H-K. Association between oral health and colorectal adenoma in a screening population. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e12244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Michaud DS, Lu J, Peacock-Villada AY, Barber JR, Joshu CE, Prizment AE, et al. Periodontal disease assessed using clinical dental measurements and Cancer risk in the ARIC study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:843–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shao J, Wu L, Leng W-D, Fang C, Zhu Y-J, Jin Y-H, et al. Periodontal disease and breast Cancer: a meta-analysis of 1,73,162 participants. Front Oncol. 2018;8:601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Güven DC, Dizdar Ö, Akman AC, Berker E, Yekedüz E, Ceylan F, et al. Evaluation of cancer risk in patients with periodontal diseases. Turk J Med Sci. 2019;49:826–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kim GW, Kim Y-S, Lee SH, Park SG, Kim DH, Cho JY, et al. Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk for proximal colorectal neoplasms. Sci Rep. 2019;9:7528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    da Silva APB, Alluri LSC, Bissada NF, Gupta S. Association between oral pathogens and prostate cancer: building the relationship. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2019;7:1–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by the State Ministry for Higher Education, Research and the Arts, Free State of Saxony, Germany. Funding bodies were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, or writing of the manuscript. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RF, MB, RT, and IG conceived and designed the study. RF and MB designed the experiments and performed the sample size analysis. CB, RF, and CL designed the online tool and the exercise components. RT organized and planned the blood sample analysis. RF, RT, MB, and IG wrote the original draft. UT, PH, KK, JK, FL, JS, BA, JW, UB, PW, CT, RB, BJW and AS gave advice on the implementation of the study design at the study sites and are involved in recruitment and data acquisition. All authors substantively revised the work and have read and approved the submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Falz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures described in this study will be performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent or its equivalent will be obtained from all patients. The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Leipzig (No. of the approval: 056/20-ek), the Ethics Committee of the Technische Universität Dresden (No. BO-EK-581122020 and the Ethics Committee of the Hannover Medical School (No. 9195_BO_K_2020). Protocol modifications need to be reported to the Ethics Committees. Participant insurance was contracted for the study realization.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no financial or non-financial competing interests related to this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

, corrected publication 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Falz, R., Thieme, R., Tegtbur, U. et al. CRBP-TS - evaluation of a home-based training and health care program for colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer using telemonitoring and self-management: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 13, 15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-021-00244-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Home-based exercise
  • Oxygen uptake
  • Counseling