Skip to main content

Angiotensin-(1–7) oral formulation improves physical performance in mountain bike athletes: a double‐blinded crossover study



The ECA2/Ang-(1–7)/Mas axis is shown to be involved in effects mediated by physical exercise, as it can induce the release of nitric oxide (ON) and bradykinin (BK), which are potent vasodilators. The vasodilating action the NO/BK can contribute to increased metabolic efficiency in muscle tissue and central nervous system. The formulation HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) through its mechanisms of action can be a promising supplement to aid in the maintenance and improvement of performance and may also favor recovery during competitions. The premise of this study was to investigate the effects of acute oral supplementation HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) on the performance of mountain bike (MTB) practitioners.


Fourteen recreational athletes, involved in training programs for at least one year, participated in this crossover design study. Subjects underwent two days of testing with a seven-day interval. HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) (1.75 mg) and HPβCD-Placebo were provided in capsules three hours prior to tests. To determine the safety of the HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) formulation associated with physical effort, cardiovascular parameters heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were analyzed. Physical performance was measured using maximal oxygen uptake (VO2), total exercise time (TET), mechanical work (MW), mechanical efficiency (ME), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Respiratory exchange coefficient (REC), lactate and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs) were measured. Maximal incremental tests were performed on a progressively loaded leg cycle ergometer.


There were no significant differences in terms of HR or BP at rest and maximum effort between the HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) and placebo groups. The VO2max showed significant differences (p = 0.04). It was higher in the Ang-(1–7)condition (66.15− 1.min− 1) compared to the placebo (60.72− 1.min− 1). This was also observed for TET (Ang-(1–7) 39.10 min vs. placebo 38.14 min; p = 0.04), MW (Ang-(1–7) 156.7 vs. placebo 148.2; p = 0.04), and at the lowest RPE (Ang-(1–7) vs. placebo; p = 0.009). No significant differences were observed for REC, NEFAs, or Lactate.


These results suggest that HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) improves the physical performance of MTB recreational athletes and could be a promising supplement.

Trial registration

RBR-2 × 56pw8, registered January 15th, 2021. The study was prospectively registered.

Peer Review reports


The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) recognized as a system involved in cardiovascular and electrolyte control [1], plays a key role in various other physiological systems. The skeletal muscle is one of them [2, 3] the RAS system has important effects in skeletal muscle that can affect the physical performance, as well insulin sensitivity improve [4] and muscle atrophy inhibition [5].

The heptapeptide the Angiotensin-(1–7), is traditionally recognized by cardiovascular effects [6], but studies show the influence in performing physical exercises. In a study conducted by Motta-Santos [7], Knockout mice by the angiotensin II converting enzyme (ECA2), an enzyme responsible for the production of angiotensin-(1–7) from Ang II, showed less physical performance and less cardiac adaptation to exercise[7].

Latest data from our laboratory have shown, that treatment with the oral formulation of Ang-(1–7) included in HPβ-CD, a cyclodextrin used in the formation of drug inclusion compounds that improves stability, solubility, bioavailability, uniform activation, absorption and gastric protection [8] prevents exercise-induced muscle damage in young people undergoing a protocol of injury induced by physical exertion (i.e., eccentric exercise). This formulation was associated with lower perception of acute muscle pain, as well as improvement in maximum strength levels and lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines at 48 and 72 h after the exercise session [9]. This suggests that the formulation HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) attenuates muscle damage in addition to maintaining physical performance showed by improve in strength levels [9].

Another important effect of Ang-(1–7) is the augments the bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO), promoting increased expression and activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) via the Akt (PKB) protein-dependent signaling pathway, inducing vasodilation [10, 11]. Seeing that NO is an important mediator of several physiological processes, regulating tissue blood flow, muscle contraction, and mitochondrial biogenesis, Ang-(1–7) may act through this molecule, affecting positively physical performance [12].

Evidence indicates that, in addition to vasodilatory effects, transgenic rats with high levels of circulating Ang-(1–7) showed better tolerance and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake [13]. Another study [14] demonstrated increased muscle microvascular recruitment following Ang-(1–7) infusion, increasing glucose uptake via the Glut-4 receptor, this date indicate that this peptide affect the muscle metabolic control.

In central nervous system the XIE; ZHU; JI; TIAN et al. [15] the Ang-(1–7) reduced the cognitive deficits; this neuroprotective effect was associated with increased NO generation. Beyond neuroprotection, the Ang-(1–7) promotes a reduction in the release of norepinephrine monoamine (NA) centrally by BK / NO dependent manner [16, 17]. The central fatigue during exercise is associate with increase in NA and other monoamines (serotonin and dopamine) [18], so it is possible that the Ang-(1–7) contribute with reduction of the central fatigue during exercise.

Based on the evidence of both animal and human models regarding the physiological effects of Ang-(1–7), the present study aims to evaluate the effects of the HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) oral formulation on the physical performance of MTB athletes. In addition, considering the effects of Ang-(1–7) on cardiovascular and central nervous system, we evaluated the blood pressure, heart rate and perceived effort responses after exercise associate to supplement Ang-(1–7) orally.


Ethical aspects

This was an experimental study conducted at the Physical Education School, Federal University of Ouro Preto in the Exercise Physiology Laboratory, approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee under protocol no. 25402813.2.1001.5150. We submitted the present study to the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC), and it was approved under number RBR-2 × 56pw8, registered January 15th, 2021. To participate in the study, the participants were made aware of the study objectives and the possible benefits and risks. All provided informed written consent. This study adheres to CONSORT guidelines [19].

Sample calculation

The sample size was calculated based on a previous study by our research group [9], that used the same dosage of HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) in individuals submitted to eccentric exercise protocol, we used the biochemical marker creatine kinase (CK) for the sample calculation. The analysis were performed using the Bioestat software (5.3), the CK showed a variation of 197 U / L ± 159U / L in the study, the statistical power was of 0.8, and a significance level of 0.05, the sample calculation resulted in 11 volunteers per group.

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion criteria were involvement in cycling training programs for at least 12 months and carrying out at least four MTB training sessions per week.

Participants were excluded if they had used supplements with a potential stimulatory effect on the cardiovascular system (such as caffeine and guarana powder). Has had current injuries or in the past six months, has not been willing to abstain from intense exercise 24 h before the test. Participants were tested at the same time of day for each of the experimental visits.


The first author of the study performed the interventions and recruited the volunteers. Participants were recruited in local community from June to August 2016. The data assessment started in August 2016 and ended in October 2016, after reaching the estimated number of participants.

Sample characteristics

Altogether, 21 cyclists of both sex (3 female and 18 male), volunteered for this study. For the final analysis, 14 volunteers (2 female and 12 male) were considered eligible (see CONSORT flow diagram, Fig. 1). Average age was 29 ± 5 years; Average body weight was 71 ± 7 kg; Average height was 1.70 ± 0.07 m; Average body mass index was 24 ± 2 kg/m2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

CONSORT flow diagram

Experimental design

The distribution of the formulation was double-blind and randomized. Participants received the formulation of HPβ-CD-Placebo or HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) (1.75 mg), 50 % of subjects randomly used HPβ-CD-Placebo in the first session and HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) in the second session or vice versa. The double blind and the randomization of the experiments were performed by the corresponding researcher. The same, assigned a code for each participant. The code was revealed to other researchers only at the time of data interpretation.

A single dose of the HPβ-CD-Placebo or formulation HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) was given orally, both in capsule form, three hours before the beginning of each test. The capsules were identical in color, size and without flavor, ensuring the blinding of the participants.

During the intervention, we requested that physical training, food intake, and sleep hours be maintained. The volunteers were subjected to two days of tests with a seven-day interval between them, which can be considered a safe washout time. Upon return to the laboratory, we ask from the subjects to determine if there were adverse reactions and if they had maintained their diet and physical training routines. A schematic for the experimental trial is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Experimental trial schematic. Participants completed both conditions in a double-blind, randomized, crossover manner, each separated by ≥ 7 days

Physical exercise protocol using the leg ergometer cycle

The test protocol was based on previous studies with MTB athletes [20]. The tests were performed using a leg ergometer cycle (Biotec 2100, CEFISE Biotechnology), with 10 min of warm up and a load of 12.5 W for both genders. After warming up, a continuous progressive load test was performed with an initial load of 25 W for women and 37.5 W for men. The load was increased by 12.5 W every three minutes for both genders. The test finished when the individual reached voluntary exhaustion or when the rotation could not be kept at 70 rpm. At the end of each stage, heart rate (HR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2), and respiratory exchange coefficient (REC) were collected.

Supplementation protocol

The formulation was developed by the Laboratory of Hypertension and Laboratory of Chemical of the University of Federal of Minas Gerais; the details were described previously [21]. This compound (HPβCD/Ang-(1–7)) was patented (BR 10 2016 0244064/Federal University of Minas Gerais/Federal University of Ouro Preto).

Oral supplementation with HPβCD-angiotensin-(1–7) (1.75 mg) or HPβCD-placebo (1.75 mg) was administered 3 h before the test protocol. The 3 h time was pre-established considering the peak action of angiotensin-(1–7) which has a window of action between 2 and 6 h [22].

Considering toxicity and adverse responses in humans, the present study used a dose 16 times lower (1.75 mg) than the dose used in a study conducted in cancer patients (400 µg/kg)[23] that showed no collateral effects. In addition, a previous study in healthy younger [9] showed protective effects against muscle damage using the same dose without side-effects.

Plasma analysis

Blood samples were collected from the antecubital vein by a skilled phlebotomist using standard technical venipuncture. Approximately 12 ml were collected in vacutainer tubes. Immediately after collection, the blood was centrifuged at 3.000 rpm for ten minutes, and the serum transferred to Eppendorf tubes stored at − 80 °C. Aliquots were used to measure non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) and creatine kinase (CK).

Blood lactate levels

Lactate levels were measured in each participant’s index finger by placing one drop (5 µl) of blood on a BM-Lactate reagent strip (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, D68298 Mannheim, Germany) and introducing it into the Accutrend® Lactate meter (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, D-68,298 Mannheim, Germany). Lactate was measured immediately at the end of each test.

Non‐esterified fatty acids (NEFAs)

NEFAs were analyzed according to the specific colorimetric method using the Randox® kit (Randox Laboratories, Oceanside, CA, USA).

Mechanical work and efficiency

To calculate mechanical work and efficiency, the equations above were used [24]. Work is described as follows: w = time (min) × load (kg) × wheel circumference (m) × rotation (rpm), in kg.m., while mechanical efficiency was calculated using the equation:

$$mechanical efficiency= \frac{useful work \left(\frac{mechanical work \left(kg.m\right)}{perfect machineconstant \left(kg.m\right)}\right)}{energy expenditure \left(kcal\right)} \times 100$$


where the perfect machine constant is the energy spent by a machine without loss of efficiency to perform work (1 kcal = 426.4 kg.m) in %.

Evaluation of BP and HR

Blood pressure was measured with an aneroid sphygmomanometer (Missouri®, Brazil) and stethoscope (Missouri®, Brazil) before and immediately after (20 s) the end of the test protocol. HR was measured with Polar RS800 (POLAR, Finland) at rest, along the steps and at the peak of maximum physical test effort.

Evaluation of subjective rating of perceived exertion (RPE)

Participants evaluated their fatigue using the subjective rating of perceived exertion with reference to the Borg Scale [25]. RPE was determined at each stage completed by the volunteer.

Evaluation of maximum oxygen consumption

The aerobic capacity was determined in the HPβ-CD-placebo and HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) conditions using open-circuit spirometry on VO2000® (VO2000, MedGraphics®□, Saint Paul, Minessota-USA) equipment during the leg ergometer cycle physical test calibrated before each test. The ventilatory equivalent for oxygen (VE/VO2), ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were recorded at each stage completed to determine maximal oxygen uptake and respiratory exchange quotient. The average of the final two minutes of the test was used to determine the relative VO2 [26].


The main objective and primary outcome of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the formulation on the physical performance of cyclists, in response to this, we evaluated the total exercise time on a leg cycle ergometer, maximum oxygen consumption, mechanical work and mechanical efficiency. The secondary outcomes were the biochemical parameters (NEFA, lactate and RQ) and the rates of perceived exertion using the Borg scale. We obtained the primary and secondary results at the beginning of the test, during and immediately after (20 s) of the progressive load protocol until voluntary fatigue. All tests were performed by the first author, who was unaware of the participants’ allocation.

Statistical analysis

Data normality was tested using the D’Agostino & Pearson test. The data that were normally distributed were compared using the paired t-test. For non-normal data, the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test was used. Information regarding data normality was added to the figures. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and the significance level was p < 0.05 for all tests. For the evaluation throughout the stages of the physical test, a regression using equations of straight line were also used. To run the test, we chose the fitting method of least squares regression without weighting. The null hypothesis was that one curve would fit the two conditions (HPβ-CD-Placebo and HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7). The curve comparison method was the extra sum-of-squares F-test and the p-value was fixed at 0.05. The measurement of effect size used was Cohen’s d (Cohen’s d = (M2 - M1) ⁄SDpooled). The effect size was evaluated based on Cohen’s guidelines: small (0.2), medium (0.5), and large (0.8). The lower 95 % CI of the mean and the upper 95 % CI of the mean for both groups were added to the figure legend.


Blood pressure and heart rate responses after HPCD–Ang-(1–7) administered orally

Considering the effect of Ang-(1–7) in cardiovascular system, we collected the BP and HR before and after exercise. There were no differences between conditions for SBP in rest (HPβCD-placebo = 123.30 ± 12.9 mmHg vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 123.30 ± 13.9 mmHg; or SBP after exercise (HPβCD-placebo = 167.70 ± 22.8 mmHg vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 168.50 ± 19.9 mmHg; p = 0.8802; Paired t-test) (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3
figure 3

ystolic blood pressure - baseline and maximum (a); Diastolic blood pressure - baseline and maximum (b); mean arterial pressure - baseline and maximum (c); Heart Rate average values throughout the tests (d); in HPβ-CD-Placebo and Hβ-CD-Ang-(1-7). Mean ± SD. No differences for parried Systolic blood pressure - baseline and maximum (a); Diastolic blood pressure - baseline and maximum (b); mean arterial pressure - baseline and maximum (c); Heart Rate average values throughout the tests (d); in HPβ-CD-Placebo and Hβ-CD-Ang-(1-7). Mean ± SD. No differences for parried. t test overall or Wilcoxon. a Baseline - t = 0.01975; Effect Size = ES (Cohen's d = 0.00); Lower 95% CI for Placebo = 116.20 & Ang-(1-7) = 115.60; Upper 95% CI for Placebo = 130.50 & Ang-(1-7) = 131.00 (n = 14); a Maximum - t = 0.1540; ES, d = 0.03; Lower 95% CI for Placebo = 153.90 & Ang-(1-7) = 156,40; Upper 95% CI for Placebo = 181.50 & Ang-(1-7) = 180.50 (n = 14); b Baseline - w = -28; ES, d = 0.46; 95% CI of median for HPβ-CD-Placebo = 98.71% & Hβ-CD-Ang-(1-7) = 98.71% (n = 14); b Maximum - t = 0.4341; ES d = 0.14; Lower 95% CI of mean for HPβ-CD-Placebo = 62.70 & Hβ-CD-Ang-(1-7) = 62.70; Upper 95% CI of mean for HPβ-CD-Placebo = 73.01 & Hβ-CD-Ang-(1-7) = 75.87 (n = 14); (c) Baseline - t = 1.024; ES, d = 0.30; Lower 95% CI for Placebo = 90.16 & Ang-(1-7) = 87.04; Upper 95% CI for Placebo = 100.80 & Ang- (1-7) = 98.16 (n = 14); c Maximum - t = 0.6821; ES, d = 0.17; Lower 95% CI for Placebo = 93.30 & Ang-(1- 7) = 95.56; Upper 95% CI for Placebo = 106.70 & Ang-(1-7) = 108.30 (n = 14); d No differences between the two conditions HPβ-CD-Placebo and HPβ-CD-Ang-(1-7) during the performance of physical test were observed for the Heart Rate average (F = 1.023; p = 0.3604). Mean ± SD in each stage were used to build the graphic (n = 14).

There were no differences to DBP in rest (HPβCD-placebo = 80.71 ± 9.2 mmHg vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 76.43 ± 9.28 mmHg; p = 0.1855; Wilcoxon) or after exercise (HPβCD- placebo = 67.86 ± 8.9 mmHg vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 69.29 ± 11.4 mmHg; p = 0.6714; Paired t-test) (Fig. 3b).

There were no differences between groups for MAP (HPβCD-placebo = 95.48 ± 9.2 mmHg vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 92.6 ± 9.6 mmHg; p = 0.3246; Paired t-test) or after exercise (HPβCD-placebo = 100.00 ± 11.6 mmHg vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 101.90 ± 11.00 mmHg (Fig. 3c).

The HR at rest was as follows: HPβCD-placebo = 58 ± 9.3 bpm vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 55 ± 9.0 bpm. In the final of first stage of the test, HR was as follows: HPβCD-placebo = 88 ± 11.5 bpm vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 92 ± 5.7 bpm (Fig. 3d). In the final of the last stage, HR was as follows: HPβCD-placebo = 191 ± 10.6 bpm vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 189 ± 17.67 bpm (Fig. 3d). No differences for HR were observe between conditions.

Performance variables after HPCD–Ang-(1–7) administered orally

The total exercise time was significantly higher, approximately one minute, in the treated condition HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) = 39.10 ± 5.78 min vs. HPβCD-placebo = 38.14 ± 5.64 min (Fig. 4a), accompanied (as expected) by a higher VO2max: HPβCD-placebo = 60.72 ± 7.03− 1.min− 1 vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 66.15 ± 12.47− 1.min− 1 (Fig. 4b) and a higher level of mechanical work: HPβCD-placebo = 148.6 ± 40.20 kilojoule vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 156.7 ± 17.43.71 kilojoule (Fig. 4c). No differences were observed to Mechanical efficiency: HPβCD-placebo = 17.10 ± 2.86 % vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 18.07 ± 3.29 % (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Physical performance. a Total exercise time (TET); p = 0.04142; t = 2.263; Effect Size (ES) (Cohen’s d = 0.17); Lower 95 % CI of mean for HPβ-CD-Placebo = 34.88 & Hβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) = 35.76; Upper 95 % CI of mean for HPβ-CD-Placebo = 41.40 & Hβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) = 42.44 (n = 14); b VO2max; p = 0.04169; t = 2.203; ES d = 0.55; Lower 95 % CI for Placebo = 58.07 & Ang-(1–7) = 61.01; Upper 95 % CI for Placebo = 64.57 & Ang-(1–7) = 71.60 (n = 14); c Mechanical work (MW); p = 0.02575; t = 2.577; ES d = 0.21; Lower 95 % CI for Placebo = 122.6 & Ang-(1–7) = 128.9; Upper 95 % CI for Placebo = 173.7 & Ang-(1–7) = 184.5 (n = 12); d Mechanical efficiency (ME); t = 1.385; ES d = 0.10; Lower 95 % CI for Placebo = 15.55 & Ang-(1–7) = 15.63; Upper 95 % CI for Placebo = 18.95 & Ang-(1–7) = 19.47 (n = 12); e Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE); significative difference between the two conditions HPβ-CD-Placebo and HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) during the performance of physical test was observed for the RPE (F = 21.77; p < 0.0001) box and whisker (min to max)

Interestingly, the linear regression of ratings of perceived exertion were significantly different (p = 0.0001). In this case, individuals who received HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) (r² = 0.75) during the performance of physical test reported a lower perception of effort throughout the entire test when compared to HPβCD-placebo (r² = 0.77) and were able to complete the test one stage ahead, at 48 min (Fig. 4e).

HPCD–Ang-(1–7) administered orally not alter lactate, plasma non non-esterified fatty acids and respiratory exchange coefficient

Considering the effects of Ang-(1–7) on metabolic control, we found that the respiratory exchange coefficients were not significantly different (p = 0.36) when comparing HPβCD-placebo (r² = 0.81) vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) (r² = 0.85) (Fig. 5a). Note that the columns almost overlap and that a single line explains the behavior of the two groups for respiratory exchange coefficient (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Respiratory exchange coefficient (REC) Lactate and Non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA). a There were no differences between the two conditions HPβ-CD-Placebo and HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) during the performance of physical test for REC (F = 0.2255; p = 0.7983) box and whisker (min to max). b Lactate; t = 0.4691; ES d = 0.20; Lower 95 % CI for Placebo = 9.671 & Ang-(1–7) = 10.08; Upper 95 % CI for Placebo = 13.04 & Ang-(1–7) = 13.64 (n = 11); c Non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA); t = 0.7909; ES d = 0.29; Lower 95 % CI for Placebo = 0.5853 & Ang-(1–7) = 0.5863; Upper 95 % CI for Placebo = 0.8588 & Ang-(1–7) = 0.7537 (n = 12); Mean ± SD (parried t test)

The lactate levels HPβCD-placebo = 11.35 ± 2.50 mmol/L vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 11.86 ± 2.65 mmol/L (Fig. 5b) and the concentration of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) HPβCD-placebo = 0.72 ± 0.21mmol/L vs. HPβCD-Ang-(1–7) = 18.07 ± 3.29 mmol/L (Fig. 5c) not were different between conditions.


The present study is the first to show that there is an effect of using an oral formulation of HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) with relatively low doses of the peptide (1.75 mg) on the physical performance of MTB athletes. The results show a significant difference in TET, MW, maximal oxygen uptake, and lower RPE.

The oral formulation HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) was not associated with cardiovascular alterations because there were no differences in HR and BP between conditions at rest or after strenuous exercise compared to the placebo, suggesting that this dose do not affect cardiovascular system. Traditionally the Ang-(1–7) is associated to cardiovascular effects, so this present work is the first that observed the cardiovascular response induced by the Ang-(1–7) associates with exercise in humans and more specific in this case, in athletes.

Clinical studies in healthy subjects, show that the Ang-(1–7) has no effect in blood pressure [27, 28]. The dose used in the present study is low compared to the study that evaluated antiangiogenic effect of Ang-(1–7), the maximum dose that produces toxicity was 700 µg/kg [23], our study used a dose sixteen time lower.

It is well established that performance in aerobic endurance exercise is related to maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), mechanical economy/efficiency during exercise and lactate threshold [29]. In the present study, the athlete under the influence of the oral formulation HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) increased the total effort time, mechanical work and consumed an average of− 1.min− 1 more oxygen at peak exercise effort. The possible mechanisms involved in increased physical performance may involve effects of Ang-(1–7) such as vasodilation, increased blood flow.

The vasodilatory effects of Ang-(1–7) were observe in arterioles of the adipose and atrial tissue of patients with or without clinical diagnosis of coronary artery diseases. [30] Intra-brachial infusion of the Ang-(1–7) increased forearm blood flow in healthy and hypertensive subjects [31], reduces Ang II-induced vasoconstriction in mammary arteries of healthy subjects [32]. Ang-(1–7) stimulated the production of endothelium-derived nitric oxide, prostaglandins, and relaxation factors in endothelial cells in animal models [33]. Acute infusion of Ang-(1–7) led to significant changes in blood flow distribution and decreased in total peripheral resistance [34]. Similarly, in another study of transgenic mice [35] expressing an Ang-(1–7) producing fusion protein, there was a reduction in total peripheral resistance, suggesting that the acute increase in Ang-(1–7) may lead to important regional and systemic hemodynamic changes.

These data strongly suggest that Ang-(1–7) may recruit muscle microvasculature and increase the area of the microvascular endothelial surface, leading to increased nutrient and oxygen delivery to the skeletal musculature [14]. Our hypothesis was that the Ang-(1–7) would increase vasodilation and blood flow, thereby improving VO2max by augmenting the nutrient and oxygen delivery to skeletal muscle.

One interesting date and that our first time observed in humans, was the lower rates of perceived exertion when the athletes were supplement by HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7). The higher central levels of monoamines as well NE are associated with increase in central fatigue during exercise [18]. Date in literature in animal model describe that the Ang-(1–7) via the Mas receptor, promote an increase on neuronal uptake, and modulating a decrease in the release and synthesis of NE, through a mechanism mediated by BK / NO [36, 37].

Recent data from our group show that transgenic rats overexpressing circulating Ang-(1–7), when subjected to strenuous exercise (6 h), had lower plasma glucose variations, lower hepatic, and muscle glycogen depletion [38]. Another study [14] demonstrated increased muscle microvascular recruitment following Ang-(1–7) infusion, increasing glucose uptake via the Glut-4 receptor.

These findings suggest that administration of Ang-(1–7) improves glucose metabolism both at rest and during exercise. Our work measure RER, lactate and NEFA in plasma with aim to found out the effects of formulation in metabolic via used during exercise, but the date does not show differences.

The limitations of present study where we do not measure the glucose before and after exercise, probably the protocol used in this study has a short time to induced significant glucose alterations, the animals study cited above use an extensive protocol, mean 6 h of the exercise strenuous. Future studies will be necessary in athletes submitted to long exercise protocols associated to supplementation with Ang-(1–7), maybe this type of exercise can be showing several factors, including the glucose alterations and other important parameters for physical performance.

World MTB competitions are decided by a difference of seconds. Therefore, the present study provides evidence that acute supplementation with the formulation of HPβ-CD-Ang-(1–7) may be potential to achieve decisive results in this modality.


The oral formulation of HPβ-CD-Angiotensin-(1–7) (1.75 mg) improves the physical performance of MTB athletes. There were increases in TET and MW, as well as higher oxygen consumption and lower RPE. There was no difference in cardiovascular parameters between the placebo and the treated condition at rest or at peak physical effort.

Future studies

The mechanisms involved in increase in physical performance describe above as vasodilatory and glucose uptake need to be investigated, local analyses in specific tissues as well skeletal muscle must be analyzed: for example, muscle biopsy and regional blood flow by Color Doppler Echocardiography.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed as part of the current study are not publicly available due to confidentiality agreements with subjects. However, they can be made available solely for the purpose of review and not for the purpose of publication from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.





Heart rate


Blood pressure


Maximum oxygen consumption


Total exercise time


Mechanical work


Mechanical efficiency


Perceived effort


Respiratory exchange coefficient


Unesterified fatty acids


Creatine kinase




Standard deviation


Systolic blood pressure


Diastolic blood pressure


Mean arterial pressure


  1. Peach MJ. Renin-angiotensin system: biochemistry and mechanisms of action. Physiol Rev. 1977;57(2):313–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiu L-L, Hsieh L-L, Yen K-T, Hsieh SS. ACE I/D and ACTN3 R577X polymorphism in elite athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(5):167.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim K, Ahn N, Park J, Koh J, Jung S, Kim S, Moon S. Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D and α-actinin-3 R577X genotypes with metabolic syndrome risk factors in Korean children. Obesity research clinical practice. 2016;10:125–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Echeverría-Rodríguez O, Del Valle-Mondragón L, Hong E. Angiotensin 1–7 improves insulin sensitivity by increasing skeletal muscle glucose uptake in vivo. Peptides. 2014;51:26–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cisternas F, Morales MG, Meneses C, Simon F, Brandan E, Abrigo J, Vazquez Y, Cabello-Verrugio C. Angiotensin-(1–7) decreases skeletal muscle atrophy induced by angiotensin II through a Mas receptor-dependent mechanism. Clin Sci. 2015;128(5):307–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Santos RA. Angiotensin-(1–7). Hypertension. 2014;63(6):1138–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Motta-Santos D, Dos Santos RAS, Oliveira M, Qadri F, Poglitsch M, Mosienko V, Becker LK, Campagnole-Santos MJ, Penninger JM, Alenina N. Effects of ACE2 deficiency on physical performance and physiological adaptations of cardiac and skeletal muscle to exercise. Hypertens Res. 2016;39(7):506–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fraga-Silva RA, Costa-Fraga FP, Sousa FBD, Alenina N, Bader M, Sinisterra RD, Santos RA. An orally active formulation of angiotensin-(1–7) produces an antithrombotic effect. Clinics. 2011;66(5):837–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Becker LK, Totou N, Moura S, Kangussu L, Millán RDS, Campagnole-Santos MJ, Coelho D, Motta-Santos D, Santos RAS. Eccentric Overload Muscle Damage is Attenuated By a Novel Angiotensin-(1–7) Treatment. Chin J Physiol. 2018;39(10):743–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dibo P, Marañón RO, Chandrashekar K, Mazzuferi F, Silva GB, Juncos LA, Juncos LI. Angiotensin-(1‐7) inhibits sodium transport via Mas receptor by increasing nitric oxide production in thick ascending limb. Physiological reports. 2019;7(5):e14015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sampaio WO, Souza dos Santos RA, Faria-Silva R, da Mata Machado LT, Schiffrin EL. RM. T: Angiotensin-(1–7) through receptor Mas mediates endothelial nitric oxide synthase activation via Akt-dependent pathways. Hypertension. 2007;49(1):185–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stamler JS, Meissner G. Physiology of nitric oxide in skeletal muscle. Physiological reviews. 2001;81(1):209–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Santos SHS, Braga JF, Mario EG, Pôrto LCJ, Rodrigues-Machado MdGr, Murari A, Botion LM, Alenina N, Bader M, Santos RAS. Improved lipid and glucose metabolism in transgenic rats with increased circulating angiotensin-(1–7). Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(5):953–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fu Z, Zhao L, Aylor KW, Carey RM, Barrett EJ, Liu Z. Angiotensin-(1–7) recruits muscle microvasculature and enhances insulin’s metabolic action via mas receptor. Hypertension. 2014;63(6):1219–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xie W, Zhu D, Ji L, Tian M, Xu C, Shi J. Angiotensin-(1–7) improves cognitive function in rats with chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Brain research. 2014;1573:44–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gironacci MM, Valera MaS, Yujnovsky I, Pena C. Angiotensin-(1–7) inhibitory mechanism of norepinephrine release in hypertensive rats. J Hypertension. 2004;44(5):783–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gironacci MM, Vatta M, Rodriguez-Fermepín Mn, Fernández BE, Pena C. Angiotensin-(1–7) reduces norepinephrine release through a nitric oxide mechanism in rat hypothalamus. J Hypertension. 2000;35(6):1248–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Meeusen R, Watson P, Hasegawa H, Roelands B, Piacentini MF. Central fatigue: the serotonin hypothesis and beyond. Sports Med. 2006;36(10):881–909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials. 2010;11(1):32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Machado C, Caputo F, Lucas R, Denadai B. Physiological and anthropometrical factors associated with uphill off-road cycling performance. Braz J Sci Mov. 2002;10(4):35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lula I, Denadai ÂL, Resende JM, de Sousa FB, de Lima GF, Pilo-Veloso D, Heine T, Duarte HA, Santos RA, Sinisterra RD. Study of angiotensin-(1–7) vasoactive peptide and its β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes: complete sequence-specific NMR assignments and structural studies. Peptides. 2007;28(11):2199–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marques FD, Ferreira AJ, Sinisterra RD, Jacoby BA, Sousa FB, Caliari MV, Silva GA, Melo MB, Nadu AP, Souza LE. An oral formulation of angiotensin-(1–7) produces cardioprotective effects in infarcted and isoproterenol-treated rats. Hypertension. 2011;57(3):477–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Petty WJ, Miller AA, McCoy TP, Gallagher PE, Tallant EA, Torti FM. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of angiotensin-(1–7), an endogenous antiangiogenic hormone. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(23):7398–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Fisiologia do exercício: nutrição, energia e desempenho humano. Traduzido por Giuseppe Taranto 7ª ed Rio Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan. 2011;83:3322.3222.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med sci sports exerc. 1982;14(5):377–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lucía A, Hoyos J, Chicharro JL. The slow component of VO2 in professional cyclists. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34(5):367–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ueda S, Masumori-Maemoto S, Wada A, Ishii M, Brosnihan KB, Umemura S. Angiotensin (1–7) potentiates bradykinin-induced vasodilatation in man. Journal of hypertension 2001, 19(11).

  28. Wilsdorf T, Gainer JV, Murphey LJ, Vaughan DE, Brown NJ. Angiotensin-(1–7) does not affect vasodilator or TPA responses to bradykinin in human forearm. Hypertension. 2001;37(4):1136–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Garnacho-Castaño MV, Palau-Salvà G, Cuenca E, Muñoz-González A, García-Fernández P, del C Lozano-Estevan, Veiga-Herreros M, Maté-Muñoz P, Domínguez JL. R: Effects of a single dose of beetroot juice on cycling time trial performance at ventilatory thresholds intensity in male triathletes. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2018;15(1):49.

  30. Durand MJ, Zinkevich NS, Riedel M, Gutterman DD, Nasci VL, Salato VK, Hijjawi JB, Reuben CF, North PE, Beyer AM. Vascular actions of angiotensin 1–7 in the human microcirculation: novel role for telomerase. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(6):1254–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sasaki S, Higashi Y, Nakagawa K, Matsuura H, Kajiyama G, Oshima T. Effects of angiotensin-(1–7) on forearm circulation in normotensive subjects and patients with essential hypertension. Hypertension. 2001;38(1):90–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mendonça L, Mendes-Ferreira P, Bento-Leite A, Cerqueira R, Amorim MJ, Pinho P, Brás-Silva C, Leite-Moreira AF, Castro-Chaves P. Angiotensin-(1–7) modulates angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction in human mammary artery. Cardiovascular drugs therapy. 2014;28(6):513–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Heitsch H, Brovkovych S, Malinski T, Wiemer G. Angiotensin-(1–7)–stimulated nitric oxide and superoxide release from endothelial cells. Hypertension. 2001;37(1):72–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sampaio WO, Nascimento AA, Santos RA. Systemic and regional hemodynamic effects of angiotensin-(1–7) in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284(6):H1985–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Botelho-Santos GA, Sampaio WO, Reudelhuber TL, Bader M, Campagnole-Santos MJ, Souza dos Santos RA. Expression of an angiotensin-(1–7)-producing fusion protein in rats induced marked changes in regional vascular resistance. American Journal of Physiology-Heart Circulatory Physiology. 2007;292(5):H2485–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gironacci MM. Angiotensin-(1–7): beyond its central effects on blood pressure. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;9(4):209–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zając A, Chalimoniuk M, Gołaś A, Lngfort J, Maszczyk A. Central and peripheral fatigue during resistance exercise–A critical review. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2015;49(1):159–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Becker LK, Totou NL, Oliveira MF, Coelho DB, de Oliveira EC, Motta-Santos D, Silami-Garcia E, Campagnole-Santos MJ, Santos RAS. Lifetime overproduction of circulating angiotensin-(1–7) in rats attenuates the increase in skeletal muscle damage biomarkers after exhaustive exercise. Chin J Physiol. 2019;62(5):226–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to sincerely thank the participants for volunteered participating in this study.


Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Pós-Graduação e Inovação (PROPP-UFOP) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), financing of inputs (kit of reagents). Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) funding scholarships. The agencies did not play any role in the design of the study and in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data and in the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SSM and ATPM were responsible for data collection, data interpretation, writing and revision of the manuscript, under the guidance and assistance of LKB, DMS and RASS who assisted in each stage and finalization of the manuscript. NLT and FADMJ assisted in the collection and interpretation of data. ECO assisted in the revision of the manuscript. DBC assisted in the finalization of the manuscript. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with the current publication, and all authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Robson Augusto Souza dos Santos or Lenice Kappes Becker.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research proposal was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Federal University of Ouro Preto, approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee under protocol no. 25402813.2.1001.5150 and all participants gave written informed consent prior to study participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable, no individual person’s data was presented.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Moura, S.S., Mendes, A.T.P., de Assis Dias Martins-Júnior, F. et al. Angiotensin-(1–7) oral formulation improves physical performance in mountain bike athletes: a double‐blinded crossover study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 13, 47 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: