 Research article
 Open Access
 Published:
Analysis of fitness among Korean adults by the cause–effect relation in lump mean scheme
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation volume 13, Article number: 111 (2021)
Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to examine whether the fitness of Korean adults can be analyzed by the causeeffect relation using the linearity or Gaussianity in the lump mean scheme (LMS).
Methods
This study analyzed previous results for the situp test obtained in the LMS by regression analysis in Sigmaplot 14. The effects of the body mass index (BMI) and new waisttoheight ratio (WHT2R) introduced by the present author on fitness were investigated.
Results
The distribution of the situp test score with respect to the BMI and WHT2R were interpreted by their Gaussianity and linearity, respectively. This means that the muscular endurance of males is determined by two causes (fat and muscle) when the BMI is a variable and one cause (abdominal fat) when the WHT2R is a variable.
Conclusions
Personal exercise aims were simpler to establish using WHT2R than using BMI. On the other hand, it was recommended for people with a low BMI to increase their fitness using exercises that increase their muscle mass.
Background
Despite their complexity, all phenomena (effects) in nature have causes, i.e., an effect cannot occur before its cause. An explicit description of the mechanism that generates a phenomenon can be obtained by knowing the reason for that phenomenon. Therefore, knowing the causeeffect relationships help understand how variations of certain variables (cause) influence other related variables (effects), which is important in various fields, such as medicine [1, 2], artificial intelligence [3, 4], natural science [5, 6], social science [7], and financial economics [8].
On the other hand, it is difficult to investigate a specific variable (cause) dependence on a multivariable distribution (effect) because the distribution is complex according to the variables, and the effects of other variables are embedded. Therefore, this study examined the causeeffect relationship between obesity (variable) and fitness (multivariable distribution) in the lump mean scheme (LMS) introduced by the present author to examine the obesitydependence of the fitness test scores [9, 10] considering the body mass index (BMI) and waisttoheight ratio (WHT2R) as obesity indices. The WHT2R is a new waisttoheight ratio presented by the present author [10, 11].
The BMI is considered a useful index for assessing obesity because it is not intrusive and is easy to calculate with acceptable accuracy [9, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The WHT2R is defined by the waist circumference divided by the square of the height [10] and was introduced because the waist circumference (WC) is more associated with cardiometabolic mortality than the BMI, and height has an inverse association with mortality [19,20,21,22]. The WC has been considered an alternative anthropometric index that is more convenient and less expensive [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Moreover, the WHT2R is a more effective index for assessing obesity associated with fitness than the BMI and other waisttoheight ratios [10].
This study examined whether the causeeffect relations between fitness and BMI or WHT2R among Korean adults can be interpreted by their linearity and Gaussianity in the LMS. Linearity (or linear regression) and Gaussianity (or Gaussian regression) mean that the relationship between two variables are represented as a straight line and a Gaussian curve, respectively. The linear regression is a technique that is appropriate to understand the relation between an independent (cause) variable and a continuous dependent (effect) variable. An example of linear regression is the relation between total cholesterol (dependent variable) and body mass index (independent variable). This method cannot be applicable if a different relationship is hypothesized, such as a curvilinear or exponential relationship. The Gaussian regression is a principled, probabilistic approach to learn nonparametric models, where nonlinearity is implemented through kernels [31]. The Gaussian distribution is the most common distribution for random variables and fits many phenomena, such as blood pressure and height. The effect is determined by only one cause when a straight line represents the relationship and two or more causes when a Gaussian curve represents the relationship.
Methods
Lump mean scheme
In many cases, it is almost impossible to investigate the dependence of a certain variable \({x}_{i}\) in a multivariable distribution \(f\left({x}_{i}, {y}_{i}, \dots \right)\). For example, Fig. 1 shows the distribution of males’ situp test scores (\(f\)) with respect to the BMI (\({x}_{i}\)) [9]. The BMIdependence of the situp test score cannot be found from the data given in the figure, and it appears that the situp test score is affected by other factors, such as aging, muscle strength, or diseases. On the other hand, the situp scores around \(\text{B}\text{M}\text{I}=24.5 [\text{k}\text{g}/{\text{m}}^{2}]\) (red vertical line) are relatively large and crowded. This indicates that the LMS can be considered.
To investigate a certain variabledependence of multivariable distribution, the lump mean values (LMVs), \({X}_{k}\) and \({F}_{k}\), of two variables \({x}_{i}\) and \(f\left({x}_{i}, {y}_{i}, \dots \right)\) in \(k\)th lump with an interval of \({\varDelta x}_{i}\) were introduced, i.e., the LMS examined the characteristics of a multivariable distribution by lumps. \({F}_{k}\) is independent of other variables because their effects are averaged out, and it can be clarified by choosing \(\varDelta {x}_{i}\to 0\). This assumption is possible when the number of subjects is sufficiently large. Other variabledependences of the distribution can be investigated in a similar manner.
Linearity
The criteria for linearity are additivity and homogeneity, and they are satisfied by the equation for a straight line,
where \(x\) and \(y\) are two variables and \(m\) is the slope. This study investigated the relationship using the equation,
Equation (2) does not meet the criterion for the linearity by \(c\) (yintercept). Therefore, Eq. (2) means the linearity between the variations of \(x\) and \(y\), i.e., \(dy=mdx\), which is the same form as Eq. (1) and \(m\) determines the variation of \(y\) for the variation of \(x\). In this case, the effect (\(y\)) was determined by only one cause, i.e., \(x\) includes only one cause.
Gaussianity
In this study, the Gaussianity is satisfied when the distribution function \(y\left(x\right)\) with respect to \(x\) is expressed as a Gaussian distribution:
where \({y}_{0}\) is the minimum value of \(y\left(x\right)\) when the constant \(a\) is positive; \(\sqrt{b}\) is the standard deviation, which determines the width of the distribution; \({x}_{0}\) is the \(x\) value corresponding to the maximum value of \(y\left(x\right)\). Differentiating Eq. (1) results in the following:
\(y\) increases as \(x\) increases when \(x<{x}_{0}\) and \(y\) decreases as \(x\) increases when \(x>{x}_{0}\) (see Fig. 2). Therefore, the effect (\(y\)) is determined by two causes, i.e., \(x\) includes two causes.
Newton mechanical interpretation
Differentiating Eq. (1) twice results in \({d}^{2}y/{dx}^{2}=0\). This is similar to the motion with constant acceleration, i.e., \(x\) and \(y\) correspond to time and position, respectively. In this case, an external force is absent, and the variation of \(y\) with \(x\) is constant.
Differentiating Eq. (3) twice results in the following:
Equation (5) is similar to the oscillatory motion with a damping term, i.e., the first term \({F}_{R}\) corresponds to the restoring force and the second term \({F}_{S}\) is the strengthening force that corresponds to the damping force in oscillatory motion.
In Eq. (5), \(y\) has a property to decrease to its minimum value \({y}_{0}\) by the restoring force, \(\left(y{y}_{0}\right),\) which increases with increasing \(y{y}_{0}\). \(y\) is also increased by strengthening force, \((x{x}_{0})dy/dx\), which is always positive because \(dy/dx\ge 0\) when \(x{x}_{0}\le 0\) and \(dy/dx\le 0\) when \(x{x}_{0}\ge 0\) (Fig. 2). Therefore, \(y\) tends to decrease by the restoring term and increase by the strengthening term because the restoring term is negative and the strengthening term is positive. The restoring term is natural because all things tend to restore to a stable state while the strengthening term forces \(y\) to increase. The strengthening term can be interpreted by the law of inertia, i.e., \(y\) has a property to prevent breaking away from its maximum value. Therefore, the Gaussian distribution is determined by competition of the restoring and strengthening terms and is represented by a curve with an extreme value, unlike straight lines.
Design and analysis
This study was conducted using the results for the situp test among previous results [9, 10] obtained by the present author using the LMVs. The previous studies used the data extracted from the national physical fitness survey conducted in 2017 by the Korean Sports Promotion Foundation (KSPO) and approved by Statistics Korea (National Statistics No 113,004). The survey is a crosssectional and nationally representative survey conducted periodically since 1989 to assess the fitness of Koreans. All of the participants provided informed consent prior to participation in the survey and the data were collected by age and gender using random allocation methods. The survey is publicly available from the KSPO. More details about study design and methods are provided on the KSPO website (http://www.sports.re.kr, available in Korean).
The situp test is a measure of muscular endurance [32]. The participants lie on the mat with knees bent at 90 degrees, feet flat on the floor and hands interlocked behind the head. The feet are held by a partner. The number of correctly performed situps in one minute was recorded. The linearity or Gaussianity between the situp score and obesity were examined using Microsoft Excel 2014 and regressions in Sigmaplot 14. This study included 4296 Korean adults aged 19 to 64 years (2082 males and 2038 females) and excluded subjects who had extreme values of BMI (kg/m^{2}), WHT2R (\(\times {10}^{4} {\text{c}\text{m}}^{1}\)) or scores on the situp (times/minute) test. The considered ranges as follows. For males, \(18.0\le \text{B}\text{M}\text{I}\le 35.7\), \(22.0\le \text{W}\text{H}\text{T}2\text{R}\le 39.9\) \(2\le \text{S}\text{i}\text{t} \text{u}\text{p}\le 72\). For females, \(16.0\le \text{B}\text{M}\text{I}\le 34.9\), \(21.1\le \text{W}\text{H}\text{T}2\text{R}\le 43.6\) \(2\le \text{S}\text{i}\text{t} \text{u}\text{p}\le 65\).
Results
Relationship between the situp test and BMI
Figure 2 shows that Gaussianity determines the males’ situp test score with respect to BMI in the LMS, where \({x}_{0}\) is the BMI for the maximum situp score. The data were well fitted to the Gaussian (red) curve because the coefficient of determination (\({r}^{2}\)) was sufficiently large.
The situp test score (\(y\)) increased with increasing BMI (\(x\)) until \(x\) reached \({x}_{0}\) and then it decreased. This can be interpreted using Eq. (4) as follows. The variation of \(y\) (\(dy\)) in region I is positive when \(\text{d}x\) is positive because \(x{x}_{0}<0\), i.e., the situp score increases with increasing BMI. In region II, the situp score decreases with increasing BMI because \(x{x}_{0}>0\). This means that both fat and muscle included in the BMI are the dominant variables affecting the situp score (or muscular endurance), i.e., the situp score increases with increasing BMI in region I because the muscle increases and the situp score decreases with increasing BMI in region II because the fat increases. Therefore, muscle and fat are the causes, and the situp score is the effect.
In Fig. 2, the green down arrows and blue up arrows denote the restoring and strengthening terms, respectively. A larger difference means that more exercise is needed to maintain the score given by the curve. For example, subject A requires more exercise than subjects B and C to maintain the situp test score because the strengthening force of A is a minimum (zero), and its restoring force is a maximum. Therefore, the degradation of the situp score (or muscular endurance) of an athlete in good health (or high situp score) is large when they stop the exercise, and it is difficult to maintain good health. In Fig. 2, subject B in region I has a small muscle mass, hence weaker muscular endurance (or low situp score) than a subject with \({x}_{0}\). Moreover, subject C in region II has abundant fat and weaker muscular endurance than a subject with \({x}_{0}\).
If the subject B in region I increases their BMI using an exercise that increases muscle mass, the restoring term increases, and the strengthening term decreases. Hence, the situp score (muscular endurance) increases. On the other hand, if subject C in region II decreases their BMI using an exercise that decreases fat, the restoring term increases, and the strengthening term decreases, resulting in an increase in muscular endurance. The subjects above the curve have good health, i.e., they have more muscle and less fat than the subjects on the curve with the same BMI. In contrast, the subjects below the curve have poorer health than the subjects on the curve with the same BMI. Hence, they need to increase their muscle and decrese their fat by an exercise that increases their muscular endurance. Other fitness parameters, such as quickness, cardiorespiratory endurance, and speed and agility, can be investigated using the data for standing long jump, 20m multistage shuttle run, and 10m shuttle tests. The present method can also be applied to females [9].
Relationship between the situp test and WHT2R
Figure 3 shows that the males’ situp test score with respect to WHT2R in the LMS is determined by linearity, i.e., the situp test score decreases linearly with increasing WHT2R. Hence, the distribution of the situp test scores with respect to WHT2Rs is given as a straight line. The data were well fitted to the straight (red) line because the coefficient of determination (\({r}^{2}\)) is sufficiently large. This means that the abdominal fat included in WHT2R is only one dominant variable affecting the situp score (or muscular endurance). Therefore, the abdominal fat is the only cause, and the situp score is the effect. Setting the purpose of exercise using the WHT2R is simpler than using the BMI because the situp scores can be increased by an exercise that decreases the WHT2R. On the other hand, the BMI has merit in that it would be applicable to establish the exercise goal of people with poor fitness by controlling muscle and fat.
In Fig. 3, subject B has more abdominal fat and weaker muscular endurance (or low situp score) than subject A. Therefore, subject B needs to increase his muscular endurance by an exercise that decreases his abdominal fat. The subjects above (below) the line have better (poorer) health than the subjects on the line with the same WHT2R. Therefore, subjects above the line need to maintain their situp score for good health, and subjects below the line need to increase their muscular endurance by exercises that increase their situp score. Other fitness parameters can be investigated similarly, and the present method can be applied to females [10].
Discussion
The relationship between fitness and BMI or WHT2R was investigated from the causeeffect relations using linearity and Gaussianity in the LMS. The distributions of male situp scores with respect to BMI and WHT2R are given as a Gaussian curve and straight line. Hussain et al. found the modest impact of BMI on lipid profile [33]. This paper found that there is also modest impact of BMI on fitness, i.e., the fitness increased to its maximum value with BMI and then decreased.
The personal exercise aims of Korean adults can be established from the present result. People below the Gaussian curve in region I of Fig. 2 can increase their muscular endurance by increasing their BMI using exercises that increase their muscle mass. In contrast, people below the Gaussian curve in region II can increase their muscular endurance by decreasing their BMI using exercises that decrease their fat. People below the straight line in Fig. 3 can increase their muscular endurance by decreasing their WHT2R using exercises that decrease their abdominal fat. Therefore, the WHT2R is a useful index to examine the causeeffect relationship between fitness and obesity. On the other hand, the BMI has merit in that it would be applicable to establish the exercise goal of people with poor fitness. Therefore, the WHT2R can be used as a more effective ratio to determine obesity and establish an exercise aim if the BMI is used in a complementary manner.
With the increasing mortality related to hypertension or diabetes, the necessity of effective methods to prevent them is increasing. The present method could be applied to examine the causes of hypertension or diabetes and to find a method to prevent them. In addition, the present method could be applied to females. Other fitness parameters, such as quickness, cardiorespiratory endurance, and speed and agility, can also be investigated. With the present method, effective exercises to increase fitness could be recommended individually, and the causeeffect relation of diseases, such as diabetes and hypertension, can be investigated. It is expected that the WHT2R can provide a more comprehensive indication of incident diabetes if it is combined with cardiorespiratory fitness [34].
Conclusions
The relationship of muscular endurance with BMI and WHT2R could be interpreted from the causeeffect relations using Gaussianity and linearity, respectively. Male muscular endurance had two causes (fat and muscle) when BMI was selected as a variable and one cause (abdominal fat) when WHT2R was selected as a variable. This study showed that the WHT2R was a more convenient anthropometric index for predicting fitness than the BMI because the fitness with respect to the WHT2R could be fitted to a simple straight line while the fitness with respect to the BMI was fitted to the Gaussian curve [9]. Personal exercise aims were simpler to establish using WHT2R than using BMI. On the other hand, it was recommended for people with a low BMI to increase their fitness using exercises that increase their muscle mass.
Availability of data and materials
Data are available from the 2017 Survey of National Physical Fitness (ISBN 9791195203567) conducted by the Korea Institute of Sport Science of the Korea Sports Promotion Foundation (KSPO) and are freely available from KSPO (https://www.kspo.or.kr).
Abbreviations
 LMS:

Lump mean scheme
 BMI:

Body mass index
 WHT2R:

Waisttoheight ratio
 WC:

Waist circumference
References
Pereda E, Quiroga RQ, Bhattacharya J. Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals. Prog Neurobiol. 2005;77:1–37.
Castro DC, Walker I, Glocker B. Causality matters in medical imaging. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3673.
Ay N, Polani D. Information flows in causal networks. Adv Complex Syst. 2008;11:17–41.
Daniel HL, Pablo MM, David LP, Alberto S. Nonlinear causal inference using gaussianity measures. J Mach Learn Res. 2016;17:1–39.
Sachs K, Perez O, Pe’er D, Lauffenburger DA, Nolan GP. Causal proteinsignaling networks derived from multiparameter singlecell data. Science. 2005;308:523–9.
Liang XS. Unraveling the causeeffect relation between time series. Phys Rev E. 2014;90:052150.
Ermakoff I. Causality and History: Modes of causal investigation in historical social sciences. Annu Rev Sociol. 2019;45:581–606.
Chen CR, Lung PP, Tay NSP. Information flow between the stock and option markets: where do informed traders trade? Rev Financ Econ. 2005;14:1–23.
Hwang S, Cho YS, Kang NL. Association between body mass index and fitness in Korean adults according to the lump mean value and Gaussian fitting. Med Hypotheses. 2010;135:109471.
Kang NL. New obesity index associated with fitness among Korean adults. Int J Clin Exp Med Sci. 2021;7:5–12.
Kang NL. Association between obesity and blood pressure in common Korean people. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021;17:371–7.
Lakka TA, Venalainen JM, Rauramaa R, Salonen R, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. Relation of leisuretime physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness to the risk of acute myocardial infarction. N Eng J Med. 1994;330:1549–54.
Dubbert PM, Carithers T, Sumner AE, Barbour KA, Clark BL, Hall JE, Crook ED. Obesity, physical activity, and risk for cardiovascular disease. Am J Med Sci. 2001;324:116–26.
Matsuzawa Y. Establishment of a concept of visceral fat syndrome and discovery of adiponectin. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2010;86:131–41.
Zhu Z. Obesityrelated cardiovascular risk and its appropriate intervention. Chin J Endocrinol Metab. 2011;12:707–10.
Arslan E, Can S, Demirkan E. Effect of shortterm aerobic and combined training program on body composition, lipids profile and psychological health in premenopausal women. Sci Sports. 2017;32(2):106–13.
Fletcher GF, Landolfo C, Niebauer J, Ozemek C, Arena R, Lavie CJ. Promoting physical activity and exercise: JACC health promotion series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1622–39.
Lavie CJ, Ozemek C, Carbone S, Katzmarzyk PT, Blair SN. Sedentary behavior, exercise, and cardiovascular health. Circ Res. 2019;124:799–815.
Olinto MTA, Nacul LC, Gigante DP, Costa JSD, Menezes AMB, Macedo S. Waist circumference as a determinant of hypertension and diabetes in Brazilian women: a populationbased study. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7(5):629–35.
Seidell JC. Waist circumference and waist/hip ratio in relation to allcause mortality, cancer and sleep apnea. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64:35–41.
Langenberg C, Shipley MJ, Batty GD, Marmot MG. Adult socioeconomic position and the association between height and coronary heart disease mortality: findings from 33 years of followup in the Whitehall Study. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:628–32.
Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Pou KM, MaurovichHorvat P, Liu CY, et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2007;116(1):39–48.
Petursson H, Sigurdsson JA, Bengtsson C, Nilson TIL, Getz L. Body configuration as a predictor of mortality: comparison of five anthropometric measures in a 12 years followup of the Norwegian HUNT 2 study. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26621.
Lee JS, Aoki K, Kawakubo K, Gunji A. A study on indices of body fat distribution for screening for obesity. Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1995;37:9–18.
Hsieh SD, Yoshinaga H. Waist/height ratio as a simple and useful predictor of coronary heart disease risk factors in women. Intern Med. 1995;34:1147–52.
Shen S, Lu Y, Qi H, Li F, Shen Z, Wu L, Yang C, Wang L, Shui K, Yao W, Qiang D, Yun J, Zhou L. Waisttoheight ratio is an effective indicator for comprehensive cardiovascular health. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43046.
Nevill AM, Duncan MJ, Lahart IM, Scandercock GR. Scaling waist girth for differences in body size reveals a new improved index associated with cardiometabolic risk. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27:1470–6.
Choi JR, Koh SB, Choi E. Waisttoheight ratio index for predicting incidences of hypertension: the ARIRANG study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:767.
Dyrstad SM, Edvardsen E, Hansen BH, Anderson SA. Waist circumference thresholds and cardiorespiratory fitness. J Sport Health Sci. 2019;8:17–22.
Vasquez F, CorreaBurrows P, Blanco E, Gahagan S, Burrows R. A waisttoheight ratio of 0.54 is a good predictor of metabolic syndrome in 16yearold male and female adolescents. Pediatr Res. 2019;85:269–74.
Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2006.
Hoffman JR. Norms for Fitness, Performance and Health. Human Kinetics Inc; 2006.
Hussain A, Ali I, Kaleem WA, Yasmeen F. Correlation between Body Mass Index and Lipid Profile in patients with Type 2 Diabetes attending a tertiary care hospital in Peshawar. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(3):591–7.
Sloan RA, Haaland BA, Sawada SS, Lee IM, Sui X, Lee DC, Ridouane Y, MüllerRiemenschneider F, Blair SN. A fitfat index for predicting incident diabetes in apparently healthy men: a prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0157703.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the Korea Sports Promotion Foundation for providing the data from the 2017 survey of national physical fitness.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NLK is responsible for the idea, design, implementation, and analysis of the study. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval was not required as this study was performed using the publicuse releases of a nationally representative crosssectional survey. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal participants performed by the author.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Exercise and health.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, N.L. Analysis of fitness among Korean adults by the cause–effect relation in lump mean scheme. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 13, 111 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102021003385
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102021003385
Keywords
 BMI
 Waisttoheight ratio
 Obesity
 Fitness
 Lump mean value
 Linearity
 Gaussianity
 causeeffect relation