Skip to main content
Download PDF

Does higher knee hyperextension in patients with hemiplegia affect lateral and medial meniscus volume in the paretic leg? A cross-sectional study

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation volume 15, Article number: 4 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

After stroke, an abnormal gait pattern gradually leads to knee pain and joint lesions, resulting the gait instability. However, the correlation between the knee hyperextension and gait pattern, the meniscus volume, and the water content of meniscus in paretic and non-paretic legs has not been fully investigated. Moreover, most of physicians tend to ignore this knee hyperextension. This study attempted to emphasize the importance of knee hyperextension using gait analysis and Magnetic resonance imaging (Trial registration number ChiCTR2000039641, date of registration 04/11/2020).

Methods

Eight patients with chronic hemiplegic (6 male, 2 female) volunteered to participate in this study. Participants was recruited if they had a hemiplegia following a stroke occurring more than 6 months, had an ability to walk 10 m without aids, had a Function Ambulation Category level at least 3 and above, and had a hemiplegic lower extremity identified as Brunnstrom state III or above identification. The spatial–temporal gait parameters and kinematic parameters in the paretic and the non-paretic legs and the percentage of free water content in deep and shallow layers.

Results

Longer time since hemiplegia led to larger angles of knee hyperextension (R = 0.56, p = 0.016), larger angles of knee hyperextension led to more tears in meniscus (R =  − 0.53, − 0,57 and − 0.70), and larger angles of knee hyperextension decreased water content of the lateral meniscus in the non-paretic leg (R =  − 0.91) but increased water content of the medial meniscus (R = 0.53 and 0.63).

Conclusions

The knee hyperextension could not be ignored by physicians and needed to be diagnosed and treated as early as possible, the time since hemiplegia could be an indicator of sign of knee hyperextension.

Peer Review reports

Background

Stroke is a disease with high morbidity and disability rate, in which about 70% of patients have hemiplegia [1]. In Belgium, approximately 25,000 patients suffer from by a stroke. Approximately 50–80% of hemiplegic survivors may regain the walking capability; however, their gait patterns are quite different than the one before suffering hemiplegia [2]. This abnormal gait pattern is characterized by alternations in spatial–temporal gait parameters, such as slower walking velocity, shorter step length, higher cadence, larger step width, and longer stance phase duration [3, 4]. Specifically, abnormal muscle activations result in compromised gait characteristics in these hemiplegic survivors, resulting in knee hyperextension, known as genu recurvatum [5] during the stance phase. More precisely speaking, among all stroke survivors, 40–70% of these patients with hemiplegia suffer from genu recurvatum [6]. This locomotor behavior induces a high knee extensor moment to prevent collapse in gait during the stance phase [6].

Long-term knee hyperextension causes the abnormal load-bearing response of the knee joint. Walking with such knee hyperextension usually induces knee pain and joint lesions, leading to cumulative damage and degenerative changes [7] and further decreasing the gait stability during stance phase. The noticeable kinematic gait change due to the hyperextension is the higher peak extensor torque in these stroke survivors compared to age-matched controls [8]. This higher peak extensor torque is speculated by the weakness of the quadriceps [8]. Importantly, these higher torque values might be the clinical concern because an increase in the extensor moment at the knee likely increases the potential risk for damages to the posterior side of the menisci [9]. Unfortunately, most of physician tend to ignore this potential risk, especially in the knee joint.

For the knee joint, the meniscus plays a critical role in increasing the contact area between the femur and the tibia to enhance the capability of the knee to bear the loading up five to 10 times more than its body weight [10]. Specifically, a study uses magnetic resonance technology to show meniscal movement and height changes during knee flexion/extension. During knee extension, the medial and lateral menisci move forward, the range of motion is larger in the lateral meniscus than in the medial meniscus; moreover, the range of motion is larger in the anterior horn than in the posterior horn [10]. This design gradually increases the tibiofemoral contact area to transfer the load uniformly to maintain the stability of knee joint [10]. However, these magnetic resonance studies majorly focus on the healthy controls but not on the hemiplegic survivors. The knowledge of how knee hyperextension affects the meniscus is limited. To understand the correlation between knee hyperextension and volume of meniscus may help physical therapies to develop an advanced rehabilitation protocol.

Moreover, about 50% of stroke patients have proprioception deficiency [11], which comes into interaction inhibition, changing the knee joint stability and causing poor activity control. This proprioception deficiency is highly correlated to the damage of nerve fibers that are innervated to the peripheral portion of menisci and the anterior and posterior horns [12]. In addition, during the knee hyperextension, the meniscal horns are compressed and stressed. These compressions and stress might potentially place the meniscus at a greater risk of injury [12] and further tear the proprioception, the perception of joint motion, and position.

Although it has been shown that knee hyperextension affects the gait pattern and damage the knee joints, this symptom doesn’t receive enough attention from clinicians and physical therapists. Therefore, the correlation between the angles of knee hyperextension and the gait parameters, the kinematics, the kinetic parameters, the meniscus volume, and the water content of meniscus in paretic and non-paretic legs has not been well-investigated. To investigate these correlations will help physical therapists to develop an effective rehabilitation and further to prevent the damage from knee joints as early as possible in these stroke survivors. This study hypothesized that there was a negative correlation between the angles of knee hyperextension and step length, cadence, stance phase, joint angles, ground reaction forces, but there was a positive correlation between the angles of knee hyperextension and knee torques. Additionally, this study hypothesized that there was a negative correlation between the angles of knee hypertension and meniscus volume, and the water content of meniscus.

Methods

Patient and public involvement

Eight patients with chronic hemiplegic (6 male, 2 female) volunteered to participate in this study [age: 50.25 (12.09) years; height: 168.87 (7.05) cm, mass: 70.62 (6.28) kg; handedness: right; Brunnstrom stage: IV; Barthel Index: 95–100; Function Ambulation Category level: 4]. Participants were included as follows: participants needed to be over 30 years old, had a hemiplegia following a stroke occurring more than 6 months, had an ability to walk 10 m without aids, had a Function Ambulation Category level at least 3 and above, had a hemiplegic lower extremity identified as Brunnstrom state III or above identification and had no previous history of knee joint injury. Participants were excluded if they had: (1) cognitive impairment with a score < 24 in the Mini-Mental State Examination, (2) involvement of the neurological diseases that affect walking ability, (3) history of pain, swell, malformation and disorder of the knee, routine MRI findings of both knees indicating cartilage and meniscus injury, (4) involvement of severe dysfunction of the mean organs. This study was approved by Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital of Capital Medical University Ethics committee (#2021bkkyLW001) and all participants have been gaved informed consent. We used the STROBE cross sectional checklist when writing our report [13].

Equipment

The spatial–temporal gait parameters and kinematic parameters in the paretic and the non-paretic legs were collected using VICON Motion Analysis System (Oxford Metrics Limited, UK) with eight infrared cameras and were analyzed by its supporting software system. The reflective markers were placed on the anatomical positions based on Plug in gait model to detect the joint kinematics, in which the marker of the knee is lateral femur condylar (Fig. 1). The sampling rate was 200 Hz. Additionally, two Kistler force platforms were used to measure the ground reaction force and knee flexion/extension torques in the paretic and intact legs. The sampling rate was 1000 Hz. For measuring the water content of meniscus and the volume of meniscus, a GE Pioneer 3.0 T Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner with a dedicated 16-channel knee surface coil and 3D dual echo UTE sequence was used for MRI examination for both subjects' paretic and non-paretic knees. The scanning parameters were TR/TE1/TE2: 12/0/4.6 ms (respectively); Matrix: 400 × 400; field of view:180 mm; 2.0 mm thickness; Volume of voxel: 0.4 5 × 0.45 × 2.0 mm3; Flap Angle: 8°; Half bandwidth:125 kHz. NEX = 1. The positioning line was placed perpendicularly to the posterior edge of the femoral internal and external condyle, and 20 layers of sagittal images were collected consistently. The scanning time of each knee joint was 22 s.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The marker setting for this study

Full size image

Protocol

After participants were consented, they were sent to Magnetic resonance imaging room at Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital of Capital Medical University for imaging processing and data measurement. These images were captured and processed by radiologists with at least 10 years above experience in this field. To accurately measure the images, the steps needed to be followed. The first step was to open the TE = 0 images through the three-dimensional synchroview and select the optimal angle to measure the cartilage. Specifically, the signal intensity of cartilage at the thickest bearing point of the medial and lateral femoral condyles, the thickest bearing point of the medial and lateral tibial condyles, the anterior/posterior junction of the femur in the horn of the medial and lateral meniscus, and the anterior/posterior junction of the tibia in the horn of the medial and lateral meniscus were measured. Also, an elliptical region of interest was used to eliminate the errors for measuring the cartilage volume. We calculated the 3D volume of the meniscus base on the reconstruction of sagittal plane image and coronal plane image. Matching the coronal plane image, we operated at the sagittal plane image because the region of interest was easy to fit in (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The coronal plane image and the sagittal plane image of the meniscus

Full size image

Then the second step was to open the TE = 4.6 ms images and repeated the above measurement process. The third step was to compare the images of TE = 0 and the images of TE = 4.6 ms. In the images of TE = 0, the signal intensity of cartilage was mainly formed by hydrogen protons of free water and bound water. In the TE = 4.6 ms images, the signal intensity of cartilage was mainly formed by hydrogen protons in free water. Thus, the percentage of free water content in deep and shallow layers could be calculated by the formula: I (TE = 4.6 ms)/I (TE = 0 ms) × 100%.

Each participant was instructed to walk through a 10-m walkway with their comfortable speeds. At least two successful trials were used for data analyzing, indicating that participants needed to successfully step on each force platform with one leg only. If participant stepped on each force platform partially or stepped on one force platform with any portions of two legs, that specific trial will be noted as “Not Use”. Maximum attempted trials were setup at ten trials to prevent from fatigue in these patients. Between each trial, a two-minute mandatory rest was given to participants. Spatial–temporal parameters were quantified for both limbs (paretic and non-paretic): velocity, cadence, step length, step width, and stance phase duration. Kinematic parameters were quantified in both legs: peak knee extension; peak knee flexion; peak hip extension; peak hip flexion; peak ankle plantarflexion; and peak ankle dorsiflexion. Also, the maximum knee flexion/extension torques were quantified for both limbs. Finally, the average vertical ground reaction force was used for both limbs.

Statistical analysis

A Pearson correlation was used to define the strength of the linear relationship between the angle of knee hyperextension and one of abovementioned dependent variables. The coefficient of determination, R-squared, was used to understand the strength of the correlation. R-squared value < 0.09 indicated no or very weak relationship and R-squared value between 0.09 and 0.25 was weak relationship. R-squared value between 0.25 and 0.49 was moderate relationship. Finally, R-squared value larger than 0.49 indicated strong relationship. R value < 0.3 indicated no or very weak relationship and R value between 0.3 and 0.5 was weak relationship. R value between 0.5 and 0.7 was moderate relationship. Finally, R value larger than 0.7 indicated strong relationship.

Results

The correlation between angle of knee hyperextension and gait parameters, kinematics, kinetics

A moderate-to-strong correlation was found between the month and the angle of knee hyperextension (R = 0.56, p = 0.016), between the angle of knee hyperextension and the hip flexion in non-paretic leg (R = 0.42, p = 0.092), between the angle of knee hyperextension and the knee extension in paretic leg (R = 0.98, p < 0.001), between the angle of knee hyperextension and the ground reaction force in paretic leg (R = 0.58, p = 0.048), and between the angle of knee hyperextension and the knee torque in paretic leg (R = 0.48, p = 0.05). More detail was listed in the Table 1.

Table 1 Statistical description between knee hyperextension and gait parameters
Full size table

The correlation between knee hyperextension and meniscus volume

A moderate-to-strong correlation was found between the angle of knee hyperextension and the medial meniscus volume in non-paretic leg (R =  − 0.53), between the angle of knee hypertension and the medial meniscus volume in paretic leg (R =  − 0.57), and between the angle of knee hypertension and the lateral meniscus volume in paretic leg (R =  − 0.70). More detail was shown in Figs. 3 and 4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The correlations between angles of knee hyperextension and meniscus volume

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

The meniscus volume between two stroke patients: no hyperextension in paretic leg (Left side) and had a hyperextension in paretic leg (Right side)

Full size image

The correlation between knee hyperextension and water content of meniscus

A moderate-to-strong correlation was found between the angle of knee hyperextension and the water content of anterior angle of lateral meniscus in non-paretic leg (R =  − 0.91), between the angle of knee hyperextension and the water content of anterior angle of medial meniscus in paretic leg (R = 0.53), and between the angle of knee hyperextension and, the water content of posterior angle of medial meniscus in paretic leg (R = 0.63). More detail was shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The correlations between angles of knee hyperextension and water content of meniscus

Full size image

Discussion

To our best knowledge, this study was the first study to investigate the corrections between the angles of hyperextension and the gait parameters, joint angles, kinetic parameters. Also, the correlations between the angles of knee hypertension and meniscus volume, and the water content of meniscus were investigated. Surprisingly, the results in this study found low correlations between the angles of knee hypertension and gait parameters, joint angles, and kinetic parameters. However, the results found that higher knee hyperextension indeed had a strong-to-moderate negative correlations between the angles of hyperextension and medial/lateral meniscus volume in paretic legs.

Longer time since hemiplegia led to larger angles of knee hyperextension

It has been reported that approximate half of stroke survivors experienced the knee hyperextension. Importantly, this knee hyperextension may be caused by muscle weakness and the impairment of proprioceptive sensors [11]; furthermore, this knee hyperextension causes pain and limit the patients’ movement in daily life activities [8]. However, in past decades, it has been widely investigated the symptoms of the knee hyperextension in stroke survivors. For instance, this knee hyperextension generates the knee extensor moment to prevent from falls during stance phase. However, it has never been shown the correlation between the time since hemiplegia and the angles of knee hyperextension in the previous literature. In the current study, a positive correlation was observed between the time since hemiplegia and the angles of knee hyperextension. In other words, longer time since suffering hemiplegia, larger angles of knee hyperextension could be gained. Therefore, it is worth mentioning this correlation because the best treatment exist for knee hyperextension in stroke patients at the current moment is the Ankle–foot orthoses. However, a study also shows that in patients with severe knee hyperextension, the Ankle–Foot orthoses might not be effective [14]. Using Knee–Ankle–Foot orthosis might an appropriate alternative [14]. However, the drawbacks of the Knee–Ankle–Foot could delay the recovery of normal gait and increase the spasticity of the gait in stroke survivors [14]. In such a case, based on the observation in this study, to identify the time since hemiplegia can be an initial screen to identify whether the Ankle–Foot or Knee–Ankle–Foot orthoses.

Larger angles of knee hyperextension led to more tears in medial/lateral meniscus

The medial and lateral menisci anatomically cover the superior aspect of tibia. The lateral meniscus is more circular than the medial meniscus; however, the medial meniscus is more crescent-like than the lateral meniscus. The roles of menisci are to bear the stress across the knee during standing or walking. Importantly, these menisci are to prevent knee hyperextension during walking. However, when putting too much pressure on the knee joint, the knee joint is forced to extend further than the healthy range of motion resulting in potential tears of the ligaments in stroke patients. There is a close correlation between ankle, knee and hip joint [15]. After stroke, triceps surae spasm or lower extremity muscles weakness cause hip, knee and ankle dysfunction, resulting in asymmetrical gait, presenting with significant reduction of support time, speed, stride length and step length, and significant increase of stride width of the hemiplegic extremity. During knee flexion and extension activities after stroke, decreased muscle strength and flexibility combined with the sensory impairment especially the proprioception of the hemiplegic extremity caused the meniscus cannot move with the tibial plateau, making it vulnerable to the injury by the compression of the femoral condyle and tibial plateau [16]. This might be the rationales that a negative correlation between the angles of hyperextension and the meniscus volume was found in both paretic legs in the current study. Specifically, due to the shape of medial meniscus, the medial meniscus in general suffers three times more stress than the lateral meniscus during walking [12]. In the current study, a negative correlation between the angles of hyperextension and the medial meniscus volume was observed, indicating that higher hyperextension might lead to more tears in the medial meniscus not only in the paretic leg but also in the non-paretic leg. This result might raise a concern that the knee hyperextension might need to be seriously treated as soon as possible.

Larger angles of knee hyperextension decreased water content of the lateral meniscus in the non-paretic leg but increased water content of the medial meniscus

Firstly, the average water contents were 52.85%, 53.89%, 51.98% and 53.68% of the lateral meniscus—Non-Paretic, lateral meniscus—Paretic Leg, medial meniscus—Non-Paretic, and medial meniscus—Paretic Leg, respectively. These mean values were much lower than normal healthy controls (77 ± 3.3%) [17, 18]. It was not a surprising result, indicating no matter knee hyperextension existed or not, the level of water content apparently decreased by the meniscus degradation due to the stroke [19]. The interesting results were that larger angles of knee hyperextension had a tendency to decrease water content of the lateral meniscus than in the non-paretic leg but had a tendency to increase water content of the medial meniscus in the paretic leg. In our previous study, genu recurvatum in stroke patients with hemiplegia also cause changes in the moisture content of the knee cartilage [20]. This could be explained by Warnecke et al., study that as increasing degrees of degenerations of medial meniscus in the paretic leg, the water content significantly increases and further leads to worsen viscoelastic properties inside the knee [21]. This phenomenon might reduce the water content of lateral meniscus in the non-paretic leg due to the compensated mechanism.

The angles of knee hyperextension and gait parameters had a no or low correlation

The alternations of gait parameters due to the quadriceps weakness, quadriceps spasticity, calf muscles spasticity have been linked to the knee hyperextension. Surprisingly, in the current study, a low or no correlation between angles of knee hyperextension and step length, cadence, or walking speed. Similar results have found in a review with 44 relevant studies, involving 2658 patients with stroke, concludes that stroke survivors who receive treadmill are not likely to improve their ability in their step length, cadence, and stance phase [22]. However, using joint angles and kinetic parameters might be better options to identify the knee hyperextension than spatial–temporal gait parameters. Importantly, in the current study, larger knee hyperextension in the paretic leg induced larger hip flexion in non-paretic leg but not the ankle joint to provide a compensation for balance. This result inferred that for stroke patients, the leading joint was the proximal joint because these proximal joints could generate larger power to maintain balance and also moved the body forward.

Conclusions

To prevent the tears and damages in the knee joint in stroke survivors, these results suggested that (1) the knee hyperextension needed to be diagnosed and treated as early as possible, which have been ignored frequently in the current clinic exam; (2) the time since hemiplegia could be an indicator of sign of knee hyperextension. Importantly, to our best knowledge, this study was the first to indicate the importance of the time since hemiplegia for future knee injuries; and (3) it might be not effective to identify the knee hyperextension by using spatial–temporal gait parameters.

Strengths and limitations of this study

The apparent limitation was the sample size. Currently, only eight stroke survivors were included in this study. In the future, more stroke survivors need to be recruited to identify the results in this study. Also, we were lack of the comparison within different time points of the same individual, so extending the follow-up knee MRI after 3–6 months of hyperextension-pattern walk is necessary in further studies. However, this study was the first study using MRI to demonstrate larger knee hyperextension led to more tears in medial/lateral meniscus and larger water content of meniscus.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files (see Additional files 1 and 2).

Abbreviations

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. Kuriakose D, Xiao Z. Pathophysiology and treatment of stroke: present status and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eng JJ, Chu KS. Reliability and comparison of weight-bearing ability during standing tasks for individuals with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(8):1138–44. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.33644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutin E, Pradon D, Barbier F, Gracies JM, Bussel B, Roche N. Lower limb coordination in hemiparetic subjects: impact of botulinum toxin injections into rectus femoris. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(5):442–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968309354535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robertson JV, Pradon D, Bensmail D, Fermanian C, Bussel B, Roche N. Relevance of botulinum toxin injection and nerve block of rectus femoris to kinematic and functional parameters of stiff knee gait in hemiplegic adults. Gait Posture. 2009;29(1):108–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. von Schroeder HP, Coutts RD, Lyden PD, Billings E Jr, Nickel VL. Gait parameters following stroke: a practical assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1995;32(1):25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tani Y, Otaka Y, Kudo M, Kurayama T, Kondo K. Prevalence of genu recurvatum during walking and associated knee pain in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients: a preliminary survey. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(5):1153–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.01.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo C, Mi X, Liu S, Yi W, Gong C, Zhu L, Machado S, Yuan TF, Shan C. Whole body vibration training improves walking performance of stroke patients with knee hyperextension: a randomized controlled pilot study. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2015;14(9):1110–5. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871527315666151111124937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Verma R, Arya KN, Sharma P, Garg RK. Understanding gait control in post-stroke: implications for management. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012;16(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mao Y, Lo WL, Xu G, Li LS, Li L, Huang D. Reduced knee hyperextension after wearing a robotic knee orthosis during gait training—a case study. Biomed Mater Eng. 2015;26(Suppl 1):S381–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-151326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen HN, Yang K, Dong QR, Wang Y. Assessment of tibial rotation and meniscal movement using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0065-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rand D. Proprioception deficits in chronic stroke—upper extremity function and daily living. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0195043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195043.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fox AJ, Bedi A, Rodeo SA. The basic science of human knee menisci: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health. 2012;4(4):340–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738111429419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

  14. Geerars M, Minnaar-vanderFeen N, Huisstede BMA. Treatment of knee hyperextension in post-stroke gait. A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2022;91:137–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.08.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karatsidis A, Jung M, Schepers HM, et al. Musculoskeletal model-based inverse dynamic analysis under ambulatory conditions using inertial motion capture. Med Eng Phys. 2019;65:68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao ZY, Wu JX, Lin WL, et al. MRI findings of knee pain after stroke. Shandong Med J. 2013;53(04):65–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morejon A, Norberg CD, De Rosa M, Best TM, Jackson AR, Travascio F. Compressive properties and hydraulic permeability of human meniscus: relationships with tissue structure and composition. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;8:622552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.622552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sophia Fox AJ, Bedi A, Rodeo SA. The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health. 2009;1:461–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McCann L, Ingham E, Jin Z, Fisher J. Influence of the meniscus on friction and degradation of cartilage in the natural knee joint. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17(8):995–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2009.02.012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Li WS, Li YW, Gao Q, Liu JX, Wen QP, Jia SQ, Tang F, Mo LH, Zhang YF, Zhai MC, Chen YK, Guo Y, Gong WJ. Change in knee cartilage components in stroke patients with genu recurvatum analysed by zero TE MR imaging. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Warnecke D, Balko J, Haas J, Bieger R, Leucht F, Wolf N, Schild NB, Stein SEC, Seitz AM, Ignatius A, Reichel H, Mizaikoff B, Dürselen L. Degeneration alters the biomechanical properties and structural composition of lateral human menisci. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2020;28(11):1482–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2020.07.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(1):CD002840. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002840.pub3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (81972148), Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China (7222101), Clinical Feature Applied Research Project (Z181100001718205) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC0115400). Fundings do not influence the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wenshan Li and Tiancong Li contributed equally to this manuscript.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Rehabilitation Medicine Academy, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100144, China

    Wenshan Li, Tiancong Li & Xiaoshuang Xi

  2. Second Clinical Medical Academy, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, Yunnan, 650500, China

    Rong Zhang

  3. Rehabilitation Medicine Academy, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, 261053, China

    Weishuang Sun & Dan Zhang

  4. Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100144, China

    Weijun Gong

Authors
  1. Wenshan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tiancong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoshuang Xi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Weishuang Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Weijun Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WL and TL wrote the main text. WL and TL designed the experiment and WL, TL, XX and RZ carried out the experiment. WS and DZ processed and analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weijun Gong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital of Capital Medical University Ethics committee. (#2021bkkyLW001). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Baseline.

Additional file 2.

Data of gait parameters and meniscus.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Li, T., Xi, X. et al. Does higher knee hyperextension in patients with hemiplegia affect lateral and medial meniscus volume in the paretic leg? A cross-sectional study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 15, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00611-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00611-1

Keywords

  • Knee hyeprextension
  • Hemiplegia
  • Meniscus

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation

ISSN: 2052-1847

Contact us