Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effects of HIIT training and HIIT combined with circuit resistance training on measures of physical fitness, miRNA expression, and metabolic risk factors in overweight/obese middle-aged women

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation volume 16, Article number: 123 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 10 weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and HIIT combined with circuit resistance training (HCRT) on selected measures of physical fitness, the expression of miR-9, -15a, -34a, -145, and − 155 as well as metabolic risk factors including lipid profiles and insulin resistance in middle-aged overweight/obese women.

Methods

Twenty-seven overweight/obese women aged 35–50 yrs. were randomized to HIIT (n = 14) or HCRT (n = 13) groups. The HIIT group performed running exercises (5 reps x 4 min per session) with active recovery between repetitions for 10 weeks with 5 weekly sessions. The HCRT group performed 10 weeks of HIIT and resistance training with 3 weekly HIIT sessions and 2 weekly HCRT sessions. Anthropometric measures (e.g., body mass), selected components of physical fitness (cardiovascular fitness, muscle strength), levels of miRNAs (miR-9, -15a, -34a, -145, and − 155), lipid profiles (total cholesterol; TC, Triglycerides; TG, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C), and insulin resistance; HOMA-IR index, were measured at baseline and week 10.

Results

An ANOVA analysis indicated no significant group by time interactions (p > 0.05) for all anthropometric measures, and maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max). A significant group by time interaction, however, was found for the one-repetition maximum (IRM; p < 0.001, ES= 0.751 , moderate). A post-hoc test indicated an increase in the pre-to-post mean 1RM for HCRT (p = 0.001, ES = 1.83, large). There was a significant group by time interaction for miR-155 (p = 0.05, ES = 0.014, trivial). Levels for miR-155 underwent pre-to-post HIIT increases (p = 0.045, ES = 1.232, large). Moreover, there were also significant group by time interactions for TC (p = 0.035, ES = 0.187, trivial), TG (p < 0.001, ES = 0.586, small), LDL-C (p = 0.029, ES = 0.200, small) and HDL-C (p = 0.009, ES = 0.273, small). Post-hoc tests indicated pre-post HCRT decreases for TC (p = 0.001, ES = 1.44, large) and HDL-C (p = 0.001, ES = 1.407, large). HIIT caused pre-to-post decreases in TG (p = 0.001, ES = 0.599, small), and LDL-C (p = 0.001, ES = 0.926, moderate).

Conclusions

Both training regimes did not improve cardiovascular fitness. But, HCRT improved lower/upper limb muscle strength, and HIIT resulted in an increase in miR-155 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Furthermore, HIIT and HCRT each improved selected metabolic risk factors including lipid profiles and glucose and insulin metabolism in overweight/obese middle-aged women.

Trial registration

OSF, October, 4th 2023. Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UZ92E. osf.io/tc5ky. “Retrospectively registered”.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Overweight/obesity is a serious health problem and its prevalence has increased rapidly during the last three decades [1], with more than a billion people worldwide being overweight or obese [2]. The global prevalence of obesity/ overweight is predicted to be 18% in men and 21% in women by 2025 [3]. Obesity is a multifactorial and complex metabolic disease with epigenetic interactions. Some of the epigenetic changes due to a sedentary lifestyle and high-caloric food lead to obesity and obesity-related disorders [4]. More recently researchers have focused on the role of microRNAs (miRNA) in obesity-related metabolic disorders. MiRNAs are 19–24 nucleotide non-coding RNA molecules involved in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression and as a result regulate biological processes such as metabolic risk factors [5]. Obesity affects the expression of miRNAs, which mediate diabetic macro- and microvascular complications. These changes provide unique molecular and cellular insights into their roles in obesity, insulin resistance, and diabetes mellitus [6]. In this context, miR-9, miR-15a, miR-34a, miR-145, and miR-155 are miRNAs that are associated with lipid and glucose disorders [7,8,9,10]. Decreases in miRNA expression patterns of circulating and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) such as miR-15, -34, -145, and − 155 are associated with pathophysiological mechanisms involved in metabolic disorders such as obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and atherosclerosis [11,12,13].

Physical exercise has the potential to improve health and reduce metabolic disorders [14]. One of the mechanisms suggested to explain exercise-mediated regulation of cellular homeostasis is through the modulation of the miRNA expression profile [15]. There is evidence that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves metabolic adaptations, and HIIT combined with resistance training improves lipid profiles and decreases fasting glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance in overweight or obese women [16,17,18]. However, according to the recommendations of the American Sports Medicine Association for middle-aged people, combined training (endurance and resistance) is more effective in maintaining or improving the health of overweight/obese individuals, suggesting that this training method has beneficial effects on the metabolic status by increasing muscle mass [16, 18,19,20].

The effects of aerobic and resistance training on miRNA levels vary with the exercise type under investigation [15]. There is evidence that aerobic and resistance training have the potential to induce changes in miRNA levels in cardiac muscle, skeletal muscle, and plasma in animals (rats), untrained males, and elite male athletes [15, 21, 22]. However, the role of miRNAs and their effects on metabolic risk factors such as lipid profiles, and insulin resistance are not fully understood in PBMCs during HIIT and resistance training in overweight/obese individuals. Recent studies suggest that miRNAs are involved in intracellular interactions and changes in the expression of miRNAs can occur in response to physical exercise [15]. Therefore, we aimed to examine the effects of HIIT versus combined HIIT with circuit resistance training (HCRT) on anthropometrics (e.g., body mass index; BMI), physical fitness (e.g., maximal oxygen consumption [VO2max] and lower/upper limbs one-repetition maximum [1RM]) levels of PBMCs’ miRNAs (miR-9, -15a, -34a, -145, and − 155) and serum lipid profiles (total cholesterol/TC, Triglycerides/TG, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol/LDL-C and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol/HDL-C), and insulin resistance/HOMA-IR index of overweight/obese women. Based on the relevant literature [15, 21, 22], we hypothesized that particularly HCRT would induce favorable effects on anthropometrics, physical fitness, miRNAs, lipid profiles, and the insulin resistance/HOMA-IR index of overweight/obese women. In the ongoing text and for brevity, we will refer to HIIT in combination with HCRT as HCRT only.

Materials and methods

Participants

A minimum sample size of 18 was estimated from an a priori statistical power analysis using G*Power (Version 3.1, University of Düsseldorf, Germany) [23]. The analysis revealed that this sample size would be sufficient to achieve medium-sized group-by-time interaction effects. Therefore, in order to account for potential loss to attrition, we recruited a total of N = 27 participants. The power analysis was computed with an assumed power of 0.80, an alpha level of 0.05, and a moderate ES (Cohen’s d) based on the outcome (i.e., % body fat) of a study with similar study design [17]. This study was approved by the regional research ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Twenty-seven sedentary overweight/obese women volunteered to participate in this study (Fig. 1). Inclusion criteria of participants comprised: (1) females aged 35 to 50 years, (2) BMI > 25 kg/m2, no history of CVDs or other diseases such as metabolic disorders, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, thyroid abnormalities, fatty liver disease, pulmonary disease, musculoskeletal disease, gastrointestinal disease, polycystic syndrome, and autoimmune and neurologic diseases, (3) no history of regular exercise training, dietary regimen for body mass loss or mass gain, pharmacological and hormonal interventions and smoking for at least 6 months before the start of the study, and (4) being in the 8th to the 16th day of their menstrual cycle. Numerous studies indicate that changes in miRNAs, such as miR-155, miR-145, and miR-34a, are related to changes in the levels of estrogen and progesterone hormones [24,25,26]. We attempted to enroll participants who were in similar menstrual phases/periods to eliminate the potential effects of sex hormones changes on miRNAs.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Follow-up diagram of study participants

Full size image

Exclusion criteria of participants included (1) those who discontinued regular HIIT and HCRT protocols and/or routine dietary habits for the 10 weeks of the study, (2) non-participation in blood sampling at baseline or week-10, (3) failure to complete 80% of the scheduled physical exercise sessions (Table 1). Physical activity levels and energy expenditures of participants were expressed as metabolic equivalents of tasks (METs) using self-reported physical activity patterns. The current study was approved by the ethics committee (approval number: 1396.485) and adheres to CONSORT guidelines.

Table 1 Implementation of training protocols
Full size table

All participants attended the exercise venue and received information about the protocols, procedures, benefits, and possible risks related to the study design. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The participants were randomly assigned to HIIT (n = 14) and HCRT (n = 13) groups (Fig. 1). True random number generation was used for study randomization, with the sealed envelope method containing the group assignment opened by the study exercise physiologists. The sample size was designed to detect a difference in study variables, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and 80% or greater power value. Finally, three subjects (HIIT: n = 2 due to poor physical fitness; HCRT: n = 1 due to poor awareness of the study requirements) were unable to complete the study (Fig. 1). The HIIT group performed 10 weeks of high-intensity running and the HCRT group performed 10 weeks of HIIT in combination with individual circuit resistance training. Both training protocols were performed under supervision in a gymnasium during the afternoon hours.

Exercise protocols

High-intensity interval training (HIIT)

Training protocols were conducted based on the latest exercise training instructions and the training protocols for both training groups have been used from the study protocol proposed by Ramírez-Vélez et al. [27]. The HIIT group trained for 10 weeks (Fig. 2). Each HIIT session lasted 28 min and included a 5 min warm up, and consisted of 5 running intervals at an intensity of 60–80% of the heart rate reserve (HRR) for the first 2 weeks of preparatory training and 80–85% of HRR during the remaining 8 weeks, each lasting 4 min. The work to rest ratio between intervals was 2:1. The active recovery comprised running at an intensity of 60% HRR. After HIIT, a 5 min cool down consisting of running at 60% HRR combined with stretching exercises was scheduled (Fig. 2). HIIT was performed indoor (gym) at a temperature of 25–27o C and relative humidity of 45–48%.

The HRR was calculated using the Karvonen formula [28]. Heart rates were recorded using a heart rate monitor (Polar Pacer, Lake Success, NY, USA) to control exercise intensity.

Fig. 2
figure 2

High-intensity interval training protocol (5 × 4 min) for the HIIT group (10 week). HRR = heart rate reserve

Full size image

HIIT combined with circuit resistance training (HCRT)

The HCRT group performed 10 weeks of HIIT in combination with resistance circuit training. HIIT combined with HCRT was similar as with the single-mode HIIT group and was conducted three times per week. Resistance circuit training was scheduled with two sessions per week so that training volume was similar between groups. During the circuit resistance training, HCRT participants performed eight exercises for the lower and upper limbs including the leg press, knee extension/flexion, calf raise, bench press and inclined bench press, seated rowing, and lat pull-down. The training intensity was set at 50–60% of the 1RM for the first two preparatory weeks and 65–80% of the 1RM during the remaining 8 weeks. Participants performed three sets of 10–12 repetitions per exercise. Resting periods between sets and stations were 90 s and 120 s, respectively. A warm-up set was performed at 50% of the 1RM before each exercise was performed.

Tests

Anthropometric characteristics

Participants’ anthropometric characteristics included the assessment of height, body mass, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio [WHR], and body fat percentage (BF%). Data were recorded using a digital wall-meter (Seca, China), a digital scale (Beurer BF800, Germany), flexible but non-stretchable tape meter and caliper, respectively. Body density was estimated using the Jackson and Pollack three-point skinfold (i.e., triceps, suprailiac, and thigh with Lange Skinfold Caliper, Cambridge Scientific Industries, Cambridge, MD, USA) equation [29], and body fat percentage was determined using the appropriate body density equation [30]. Baseline anthropometric data were collected 48 h before the first training session and after the 10th week (post – test) of the exercise protocol (48 h after the last training session) (Table 2).

Table 2 Physiological characteristics, miRNAs, and serum levels of cardiovascular disease risk factors of overweight/obese women before and after 10 weeks in the HIIT and HIIT + HCRT groups
Full size table

Physical fitness

An incremental maximal effort exercise test was performed on a treadmill (Bruce test) to assess VO2max. After the warm up, the Bruce test (running on a treadmill) started at an initial speed of 2.7 km/h and a 10% incline, then the incline and speed increased in each stage (every three minutes) until test completion (i.e., exhaustion). After test completion, the following formula was used to estimate VO2max.

$${\rm{VO2max}}\,{\rm{ = }}\,{\rm{0}}{\rm{.03}}\,{\rm{ + }}\,\left( {{\rm{2}}{\rm{.74*time}}} \right)$$

To estimate the 1RM, three days before the testing session, the subjects participated in a familiarization session. During the first test session, each individual was instructed to perform a general warm up (walking, dynamic stretching, 10 repetitions per exercise at light load). Afterwards, the resistance load was progressively increased until the subject was able to perform nine or fewer repetitions per exercise. Two minutes of rest was allowed between each trial, and 3 min of rest was allowed between each strength exercise and the Brzyski equation was used to estimate the 1-RM [31]. Finally, the mean 1-RM was calculated across the eight exercises by dividing the total amount of lifted load by the number of repetitions (rep) performed.

$$1{\rm{ - RM}}\,{\rm{ = }}\,{\rm{100}}\,*\,{\rm{load}}\,{\rm{rep}}\,{\rm{/}}\,\left( {{\rm{102}}.{\rm{78}} - {\rm{2}}.{\rm{78}}\,*\,{\rm{rep}}} \right)$$

load rep: workload value of repetitions performance, expressed in kg.

rep: number of repetitions performed.

Blood sampling

All participants were transported to the laboratory during the morning hours (between 07:30 and 08:30 AM) following a 12-hour overnight fast and 10-ml resting blood samples were taken in seated position at baseline (48 h before the start of the first session) and at week-10 (48 h after the last session). Half of the blood sample (5 ml) was used before and after the 10-weeks of HIIT and HCRT training to measure serum biomarkers (lipid profiles and insulin resistance). The remaining blood sample (5 ml) was mixed with an anticoagulant (ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid, EDTA) to extract ribonucleic acid (RNA) in the miRNAs (miR-9, -15a, -34a, -145, -155 and UniSp6).

RNA extraction from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and complementary deoxyribonucleic- acid (cDNA) synthesis

PBMCs were isolated from EDTA-treated blood samples using standard Ficoll density gradient centrifugation. Samples were stored at -80 °C after 1 ml TRIzol® (Ribox- RNA extraction reagent, GeneAll Biotechnology, Dongnam-ro, Songpa-gu, Seoul) was added to them. After vortexing the blood samples, RNA extraction was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Then, cDNAs of the five miRNAs were then prepared using the TaqMan microRNA reverse transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MAN0012757, California, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and miRNAs were quantified by real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) using SYBER green master mix (Real Q Plus 2×master, AMPLIQON, A323499, Denmark). Exogenously added UniSp6 was used as a spike-in normalization control. The real-time RT-PCR detection of miRNA was carried out using a stem-loop (STL) primer sequence (OG171106-250, Macrogen, Seoul, South Korea). Sample quality control was performed both spectrophotometrically (NanoDrop 1000, Thermo-Scientific™, Biocompare, USA) and by real-time PCR (RT-PCR). The RT-PCR reaction for each miRNA was performed using the following program: 1 μl CDNA, 5 μl master mix, 0.3 μl forward primer, 0.3 μl reverse primer, and DEPC-water to 10 μl. Reactions were run on a mic-PCR system (BMS Company, Queensland, Australia) at 95ºC for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95ºC for 15s and 60ºC for 1 min. All reactions and analyses were performed in triplicate. Media expression of candidate miRNAs (Ct) relative to the reference gene (UniSp6) was calculated (ΔCt). Fold changes in the miRNAs expression were calculated using the equation 2−ΔΔCT [32]. The sequence of primers used in the cDNA and RT-PCR synthesis steps is presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Primer sequence used in the cDNA and real-time RT-PCR
Full size table
$$\Delta {\rm{Ct = Ct}}\,{\rm{target}}\,{\rm{gene - }}\,{\rm{Ct}}\,{\rm{housekeeping}}\,{\rm{gene}}$$
$$\Delta \Delta {\rm{Ct = }}\Delta {\rm{Ct}}\,{\rm{test}}\,{\rm{sample - }}\,\Delta {\rm{Ct}}\,{\rm{control}}\,{\rm{sample}}$$
$${\rm{Relative}}\,{\rm{fold}}\,{\rm{change}}\,{\rm{in}}\,{\rm{gene}}\,{\rm{expression = }}\,{{\rm{2}}^{{\rm{ - }}\Delta \Delta {\rm{Ct}}}}$$

Serum biomarkers

Serum lipid (TC, TG, LDL-C and HDL-C) and fasting glucose levels were measured by standard automated laboratory techniques (Hitachi-912, Roche, Italy, sensitivity of 0.5 μM). Serum fasting insulin level was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (ParsAzmoon, Iran, sensitivity of 0.05 ng/mL) by ELISA device (BioTek ELx808, Texas, USA). Insulin resistance was estimated by the HOMA-IR index [fasting insulin (μ/ml) × fasting glucose (mmol/l)] / 22.5.

Dietary intake assessment

Subjects who had almost the same calorie intake were used in this study. Routine diet was controlled via food records of self-reported questionnaires [30] at the start and after week 10 of the study (Table 4). Participants were asked to maintain their normal diets during the study and individuals were instructed to consume a similar diet on each sampling day.

Table 4 Dietary intake differences of overweight/obese women at baseline and week-10 in the HIIT and HIIT + HCRT groups
Full size table

Statistical analyses

The SPSS statistical software program (SPSS Co, version 23, Chicago IL, USA) was used for data analyses. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. All data were expressed as means and standard deviations (SD) after data normality were checked and confirmed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Levene test was used to assess homogeneity of variances. Between-group differences at baseline were assessed using independent samples t-tests. A 2 (group: HIIT, HCRT) by 2 (time: pre, post) analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was used to examine the effects of HIIT versus HCRT on selected measures of physical fitness and the expression of miRNAs and metabolic risk factors in overweight/obese middle-aged women.

In case of a significant group by time interaction, Bonferroni-adjusted and group-specific post hoc tests were calculated. Partial eta-squared (η2) was used as an effect size from ANOVA output. Within-group effect sizes were calculated using the following equation: ES = (mean post – mean pre)/SD [33]. According to Hopkins [34], ES magnitudes were considered trivial (< 0.2), small (0.2–0.6), moderate (0.6–1.2), large (1.2-2.0).

Results

All participants received treatment as allocated. No statistically significant between group baseline differences were observed for all analyzed measures.

Anthropometrics

The ANOVA showed significant main effects of time with decreases in body mass (p = 0.015, ES = 0.241, small), BMI (p = 0.035, ES = 0.186, trivial), and BF% (p < 0.001, ES = 0.848, moderate). However, no significant group by time interactions (p > 0.05) were observed for all anthropometric parameters (Table 2).

Physical fitness

Our results showed significant main effects of time for mean 1-RM across the eight exercises (p < 0.001, ES = 0.892, moderate) and VO2max (p < 0.001, ES = 0.787, moderate). A significant group by time interaction was observed for mean 1-RM performance (p < 0.001, ES = 0.751, moderate) only. The post-hoc test revealed a significant pre-to-post mean 1-RM increase for HCRT (p = 0.001, ES = 1.83, large) (Table 2).

MicroRNAs/miRNAs (miR-9, -15a, -34a, -145 and − 155)

ANOVA indicated a significant main effect of time for miR-155 (p = 0.001, ES = 0.395, small). A significant group by time interaction was found for miR-155 (p = 0.05, ES = 0.014, trivial). HIIT but not HCRT showed a significant pre-to-post increase for miR-155 (p = 0.045, ES = 1.232, large) (Table 2 and Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

2−∆∆Ct data of miRNAs following HIIT and combined training (HCRT) protocols

A: miR-9, B: miR-15a, C: miR-34a, D: miR-145, E: miR-155

* Significantly increased in the HIIT group

Full size image

Serum biomarkers

ANOVA showed significant main effects of time for some serum biomarkers; i.e., TC (p = 0.001, ES = 0.415, small), TG (p < 0.001, ES = 0.867, moderate), LDL (p < 0.001, ES = 0.448, small), insulin (p = 0.001, ES = 0.411, small), fasting glucose (p < 0.001, ES = 0.468, small), and HOMA-IR (p < 0.001, ES = 0.560, small) and HDL (p < 0.001, ES = 0.579, small).

A significant group by time interaction was observed for TC (p = 0.035, ES = 0.187, trivial), TG (p < 0.001, ES = 0.586, small), LDL-C (p = 0.029, ES = 0.200, small) and HDL-C (p = 0.009, ES = 0.273, small). Post-hoc tests revealed significant HCRT-related pre-to-post decreases for TC (p = 0.001, ES = 1.44, large) and HDL-C (p = 0.001, ES = 1.407, large). Further, HIIT resulted in significant pre-to-post decreases for TG (p = 0.001, ES = 0.599, small), LDL-C (p = 0.001, ES = 0.926, moderate) (Table 2).

Discussion

Recent evidence suggests an important role for miRNAs as modulators of glucose and lipid metabolism by negatively regulating the expression of multiple target genes [35]. Our study demonstrated that both HIIT and HCRT training regimes failed to have a positive impact on cardiovascular fitness, although HCRT improved lower/upper limb muscle strength. Moreover, HIIT increased miR-155 expression in PBMCs. Furthermore, HIIT and HCRT improved selected metabolic risk factors including lipid profiles and glucose and insulin metabolism in overweight/obese middle-aged women.

It has previously been suggested that at least eight weeks exercise training are needed to change body composition and metabolic risk factors [36]. Some studies evaluated the effects of an HIIT program on anthropometric factors and physical fitness, where the exercise programs resulted in weight loss, improved body composition and aerobic fitness, maintained muscle mass, leading to improved muscle strength [18, 37, 38]. Moreover, the combination of HIIT with resistance training, in addition to the aforementioned effects, also stimulated energy consumption during rest by increasing muscle mass, and by lowering fat mass, muscle cells have an increased ability to alter energy metabolism during training and to regulate energy balance, which is associated with a decrease in some anthropometric variables [39].

There is evidence that physical exercise leads to a decrease in hepatic glucose production, an increase in insulin secretion from the pancreas, and a decrease in insulin resistance by improving the body fat status [40]. The increase of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and lecithin cholesterol acyl transferase (L-CAT) enzymes, the decrease of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and liver triglyceride lipase play important roles in changing the concentration of lipids and increasing the ability of muscle to oxidize fatty acid and reduce triglyceride [41]. A possible reason for the increase in HDL is its enhanced production by the liver following changes in LPL enzyme activity and decreases in liver lipase due to physical activity. The increase of LPL enzyme activity causes lipolysis and the release of fatty acids decomposed from TG in adipose, muscle tissue and blood circulation and in general, increases the catabolism of TG and lipoproteins rich in TG and removal of TG from the bloodstream, in this case, excess fat (free cholesterol and phospholipid) is transferred to HDL and causes its increase. On the other hand, the increase in LCAT activity caused by exercise training also feeds HDL particles. CETP is responsible for the transport of fats by HDL-c and other lipoproteins, which decreases after exercise, and the decrease in CETP leads to slower catabolism of HDL (increasing its half-life). It is possible that by reducing CETP activity due to exercise training, the conversion of HDL-c to LDL-c is reduced, thus leading to an increase in HDL-c and a decrease in LDL-c levels [41]. On the other hand, it has been reported that insulin levels decrease during and after exercise, which could change cholesterol levels [42]. This process requires increased membrane permeability to glucose, increased number of plasma membrane glucose transporters (GLUT4), increases in gene expression or activity of various proteins involved in insulin signaling, increased capillary density, increased glycogen synthetase activity in contracting muscle, and finally increased glycogen storage [43]. At the same time as insulin decreases, glucagon secretion also increases, which accelerates lipolysis [42].

The increased expression of miR-155 in our study could be due to several mechanisms. The expression of miR-155 is either decreased [44,45,46,47] or unaltered [48, 49] in breast cancer cells, serum, plasma, adipose tissue, and cerebral tissue following exercise training. The overexpression of miR-155 results in hypoglycemia, improved glucose tolerance, and enhanced insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues, with the imbalance of miRNAs impairing glucose and lipid metabolism [50]. Similarly, a lack of miR-155 in mice also leads to hyperglycemia, glucose intolerance, and insulin resistance [51]. Lower levels of miR-155 are related to age, gender, and weight, factors that are involved in the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders [52, 53]. A lower expression of miR-155 in PBMCs from diabetic and obese non-diabetic subjects suggests a role for miR-155 in pre-diabetes [54]. The miR-155 transgene lowers serum total cholesterol and triglyceride (TG) levels, and also decreases hepatic lipid, TG, HDL and free fatty acid levels, indicating that miR-155 reduces hepatic and serum lipid levels, likely by suppressing carboxylesterase 3/triacylglycerol hydrolase (Ces3/TGH) [55] and the X receptor alpha (LXRα)-dependent lipogenic signaling pathway in the liver [56]. Thus miR-155 regulates multiple aspects of glucose and lipid metabolism by altering metabolic genes, such as by negatively regulating the expression of HDAC4, PPARγ, C/EBPβ, SOCS1, and PDK4 [57]. Moreover, C/EBPβ and HDAC4 are involved in both insulin-stimulated AKT phosphorylation and glucose uptake in hepatocytes [55].

Increased phosphorylation of AKT enhances glucose uptake and enhances glycolysis by upregulating Gck and PKM2 and downregulating PDK4 [55]. Several studies indicate that miR-155 negatively regulates PDK4 by inhibiting C/EBPβ expression, thereby improving the metabolic profile [58,59,60,61,62,63]. In addition, miR-155 enhances insulin-sensitive glucose uptake by increasing GLUT4 expression due to downregulation of HDAC4 expression. MiR-155 activates the IRS-1/PI3K/AKT insulin pathway by inhibiting SOCS1 expression [55] which reduces blood glucose and insulin sensitivity in mice [64]. Endotoxemia stimulates miR-155 expression in pancreatic β-cells, which increases insulin secretion by targeting V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene family protein B (Mafb) under hyperlipidemic conditions. MafB represses IL-6 expression in β-cells to inhibit GLP-1 production by islet cells. Thus, miR-155-5p improves the adaptation of β-cells to hyperlipidemic stress and compensates for obesity-induced insulin resistance to likely limit the progression of obesity and atherosclerosis [11].

Exercise can cause changes in pH, local temperature, neutrophil shear stress, and increases in cytokines and growth factors (e.g., IL-6, growth hormone), all of which can alter genomic regulation of miRNA [65]. Our study suggest that HIIT improves lipid profiles, insulin resistance, and physiological parameters due to increased miR-155 expression in overweight/obese women. Other studies reported that the hypolipidemic effects of exercise could be due to miRNA-dependent autophagy. Lipophagy is an autophagic pathway that metabolizes triglycerides, cholesterol, and other fat droplets and ultimately provides free fatty acids to produce cellular energy by mitochondrial β-oxidation [66]. The increased expression of miRNAs under conditions of cholesterol depletion alters the expression of genes involved in the metabolism of lipid and glucose. The lack of significant changes in miR-155 in the combined exercise group suggests that this mechanism should be considered with caution as it is likely that other factors can also influence changes in miR-155 levels after exercise training. In addition, the reduction of lipogenic genes occurs directly or indirectly through the lowering of insulin levels as a lipogenic hormone following exercise training, but the molecular mechanisms are not fully understood [67]. Our study indicates that the HCRT protocol had a greater effects on lipid levels and insulin resistance. However, given that HIIT increases lipolysis and improves glycemic control, our findings suggest the combination of resistance training with HIIT could lead to enhanced improvements in metabolic factors. Future research is needed to pursue this latter point.

Circulating PBMCs are affected by metabolic factors such as dyslipidemia and inflammatory molecules, and can be directly involved in obesity-related complications [68]. MiRNAs are important sources of genetic information and regulate intracellular communications [5]. Exercise alters the expression of miRNAs to cause several positive health adaptations by decreasing in obesity-related risk factors in overweight/obese [12, 69]. However, optimal levels of exercise and active muscle mass for stimulating the expression of miRNAs are currently unknown. It is possible that prolonged HCRT may be required to stimulate miRNAs expression in overweight/obese women aged 35–50 years old in our study, where HCRT caused non-significant increases in all miRNAs (miR-9, -15a, -34a, -145, and − 155). However, other molecular interactions could also reduce the effects of HCRT on miRNA expression. For example, increased miR-155 expression reduces obesity and improves lipid and glucose metabolism [53], which we also observed in the HIIT group of our study. It may be likely that more than 10 weeks of HIIT and, or HCRT could be required to cause significant increases in miRNAs (miR-9, -15a, -34a, and − 145) levels. Our novel report of increased expression of miR-155 in PBMCs of overweight/ obese women is in agreement with other findings in studies examining adipose tissue [70].

Study limitations

Our study design included a two-group (pre-test vs. post-test) comparison of the effects of HIIT versus HCRT on measures of anthropometrics, selected components of physical fitness, miRNA expression, and metabolic risk factors. The study has a number of limitations such as the small number of participants in each group which could affect the interpretation of our results. Other limitations that should be acknowledged are; (i) the lack of a control group (i.e., we did not examine the effects of different exercise protocols alone compared to the effects of inactivity), (ii) no regulation of the diets of study subjects, (iii) an inability to regulate physical exercise outside of the study, and (iv) changes in menstrual cycle times in some participants after the 10 weeks of training (i.e., it is possible that some miRNAs may be affected by changes in sexual hormones). Collectively, these limitations suggest our findings need to be viewed with some degree of caution.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that both HIIT and HCRT protocols did not improve cardiovascular fitness, but that HCRT improved lower/upper limb muscle strength. Moreover, only the HIIT program increased miR-155 expression in PBMCs. Furthermore, HIIT and HCRT each improved selected metabolic risk factors including lipid profiles and glucose and insulin metabolism in overweight/obese middle-aged women.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository, https://osf.io/tc5ky/.

References

  1. Agha M, Agha R. The rising prevalence of obesity: part A: impact on public health. Int J Surg Oncol. 2017;2(7):e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheraghpour M, Ehrampoush E, Homayounfar R, Davoodi H, Zand H, Mimmiran P. The relationship between the immune system and the inflammatory mechanisms in obesity with insulin resistance. Iran J Nutr Sci Food Technol. 2013;7(5).

  3. Blüher M. Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Reviews Endocrinol. 2019;15(5):288–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deiuliis J. MicroRNAs as regulators of metabolic disease: pathophysiologic significance and emerging role as biomarkers and therapeutics. Int J Obes. 2016;40(1):88–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ling H, Fabbri M, Calin GA. MicroRNAs and other non-coding RNAs as targets for anticancer drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2013;12(11):847–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Y, Sun X, Icli B, Feinberg MW. Emerging roles for microRNAs in diabetic microvascular disease: novel targets for therapy. Endocrinol Reviews. 2017;38(2):145–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Finnerty JR, Wang W-X, Hébert SS, Wilfred BR, Mao G, Nelson PT. The miR-15/107 group of microRNA genes: evolutionary biology, cellular functions, and roles in human diseases. J Mol Biol. 2010;402(3):491–509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramachandran D, Roy U, Garg S, Ghosh S, Pathak S, Kolthur-Seetharam U. Sirt1 and mir‐9 expression is regulated during glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic β‐islets. FEBS J. 2011;278(7):1167–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Faccini J, Ruidavets J-B, Cordelier P, Martins F, Maoret J-J, Bongard V, et al. Circulating miR-155, miR-145 and let-7c as diagnostic biomarkers of the coronary artery disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmadpour F, Nourbakhsh M, Razzaghy-Azar M, Khaghani S, Alipoor B, Abdolvahabi Z, et al. The association of plasma levels of miR-34a AND miR-149 with obesity and insulin resistance in obese children and adolescents. Acta Endocrinol (Bucharest). 2018;14(2):149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu M, Wei Y, Geißler C, Abschlag K, Campos JC, Hristov M, et al. Hyperlipidemia-induced microRNA-155-5p improves β-cell function by targeting Mafb. Diabetes. 2017;66(12):3072–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Improta Caria AC, Nonaka CKV, Pereira CS, Soares MBP, Macambira SG, Souza BSF. Exercise training-induced changes in MicroRNAs: beneficial regulatory effects in hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3608.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Majid M, Masood A, Masoodi SR, Naykoo NA, Shah IA, Nissar B, et al. Expression analysis of microRNA-155 in type 2 diabetes in Kashmiri population. Int J Diabetes Developing Ctries. 2020;40(4):518–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Malandish A, Tartibian B, Sheikhlou Z, Afsargharehbagh R, Rahmati M. The effects of short-term moderate intensity aerobic exercise and long-term detraining on electrocardiogram indices and cardiac biomarkers in postmenopausal women. J Electrocardiol. 2020;60:15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wardle SL, Bailey ME, Kilikevicius A, Malkova D, Wilson RH, Venckunas T, et al. Plasma microRNA levels differ between endurance and strength athletes. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0122107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Álvarez C, Ramírez-Campillo R, Ramírez-Vélez R, Izquierdo M. Effects and prevalence of nonresponders after 12 weeks of high-intensity interval or resistance training in women with insulin resistance: a randomized trial. J Appl Physiol. 2017;122(4):985–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ouerghi N, Fradj MKB, Bezrati I, Feki M, Kaabachi N, Bouassida A. Effect of high-intensity interval training on plasma omentin-1 concentration in overweight/obese and normal-weight youth. Obes Facts. 2017;10(4):323–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Pashaei J, Jafari12 A, Alivand MR. Effect of tow types of high-intensity interval training with and without resistance training on lipid profiles and glucose homeostasis in overweight/obese middle-aged women. 2021.

  19. Cervantes J, Hernández J. Effect of high-intensity and concurrent training in body composition in Costa Rican overweight and obese women. Arch Sports Med. 2017;1(2):65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Riebe D, Ehrman JK, Liguori G, Magal M, Medicine ACS. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription: Wolters Kluwer; 2018.

  21. Pugh JK, Faulkner SH, Jackson AP, King JA, Nimmo MA. Acute molecular responses to concurrent resistance and high-intensity interval exercise in untrained skeletal muscle. Physiological Rep. 2015;3(4):e12364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gaeini AA, Javidi M, Kordi MR, Soleimani M, Fallahi AA. The effect of 8 weeks of high intensity interval training on mir-29 gene family expression and cardiac hypertrophy of healthy male rats. J Adv Med Biomed Res. 2015;23(99):14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G* power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yuan D-z, Lei Y, Zhao D, Pan J-l, Zhao Y-b, Nie L, et al. Progesterone-induced miR-145/miR-143 inhibits the proliferation of endometrial epithelial cells. Reproductive Sci. 2019;26(2):233–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fabová Z, Loncová B, Bauer M, Sirotkin AV. Interrelationships between miR-34a and FSH in the control of porcine ovarian cell functions. Reproductive Sci. 2023;30(6):1789–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu Z, Ye Y, Jiao D, Qiao J, Cui S, Liu Z. miR-155 and miR-31 are differentially expressed in breast cancer patients and are correlated with the estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status. Oncol Lett. 2012;4(5):1027–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramirez-Velez R, Hernandez A, Castro K, Tordecilla-Sanders A, Gonzalez-Ruiz K, Correa-Bautista JE, et al. High intensity interval-vs resistance or combined-training for improving cardiometabolic health in overweight adults (cardiometabolic hiit-rt study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. She J, Nakamura H, Makino K, Ohyama Y, Hashimoto H. Selection of suitable maximum-heart-rate formulas for use with Karvonen formula to calculate exercise intensity. Int J Autom Comput. 2015;12(1):62–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jackson AS, Pollock ML. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. Br J Nutr. 1978;40(3):497–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brozek J. Densitometric analysis of body composition: revision of some quantitative assumptions. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1963;110:113–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brzycki M. Strength testing—predicting a one-rep max from reps-to-fatigue. J Phys Educ Recreation Dance. 1993;64(1):88–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 – ∆∆CT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge; 2013.

  34. Hopkins W, Marshall S, Batterham A, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med + Sci Sports + Exerc. 2009;41(1):3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dumortier O, Hinault C, Van Obberghen E. MicroRNAs and metabolism crosstalk in energy homeostasis. Cell Metabol. 2013;18(3):312–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kessler HS, Sisson SB, Short KR. The potential for high-intensity interval training to reduce cardiometabolic disease risk. Sports Med. 2012;42(6):489–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Khammassi M, Ouerghi N, Hadj-Taieb S, Feki M, Thivel D, Bouassida A. Impact of a 12-week high-intensity interval training without caloric restriction on body composition and lipid profile in sedentary healthy overweight/obese youth. J Exerc Rehabilitation. 2018;14(1):118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gerosa-Neto J, Antunes BM, Campos EZ, Rodrigues J, Ferrari GD, Neto JCR, et al. Impact of long-term high-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on subclinical inflammation in overweight/obese adults. J Exerc Rehabilitation. 2016;12(6):575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee S, Bacha F, Hannon T, Kuk JL, Boesch C, Arslanian S. Effects of aerobic versus resistance exercise without caloric restriction on abdominal fat, intrahepatic lipid, and insulin sensitivity in obese adolescent boys: a randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes. 2012;61(11):2787–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cuff DJ, Meneilly GS, Martin A, Ignaszewski A, Tildesley HD, Frohlich JJ. Effective exercise modality to reduce insulin resistance in women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):2977–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sugiura H, Sugiura H, Kajima K, Mirbod SM, Iwata H, Matsuoka T. Effects of long-term moderate exercise and increase in number of daily steps on serum lipids in women: randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN21921919]. BMC Womens Health. 2002;2:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McCormack SE, McCarthy MA, Harrington SG, Farilla L, Hrovat MI, Systrom DM, et al. Effects of exercise and lifestyle modification on fitness, insulin resistance, skeletal muscle oxidative phosphorylation and intramyocellular lipid content in obese children and adolescents. Pediatr Obes. 2014;9(4):281–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ivy JL. Role of exercise training in the prevention and treatment of insulin resistance and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Sports Med. 1997;24:321–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Alizadeh S, Isanejad A, Sadighi S, Khalighfard S, Alizadeh AM. Effect of a high-intensity interval training on serum microRNA levels in women with breast cancer undergoing hormone therapy. A single-blind randomized trial. Annals Phys Rehabilitation Med. 2019;62(5):329–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu H-W, Cheng H-C, Tsai S-H, Sun W-H. Effect of progressive resistance training on circulating Adipogenesis-, Myogenesis-, and inflammation-related microRNAs in healthy older adults: an exploratory study. Gerontology. 2020;66(6):562–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rocha B, Rodrigues A, Tomada I, Martins M, Guimarães J, Gouveia A, et al. Energy restriction, exercise and atorvastatin treatment improve endothelial dysfunction and inhibit miRNA-155 in the erectile tissue of the aged rat. Nutr Metabolism. 2018;15(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lionett S, Kiel IA, Camera DM, Vanky E, Parr EB, Lydersen S et al. Circulating and adipose tissue miRNAs in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and responses to high-intensity interval training. Front Physiol. 2020;11.

  48. Zhou Q, Shi C, Lv Y, Zhao C, Jiao Z, Wang T. Circulating microRNAs in response to exercise training in healthy adults. Front Genet. 2020;11.

  49. Porsani L, Cirino M, Neto FL, Figueiredo R, de Carvalho C, da Silva J et al. Lack of effect of exercise on the expression profiles of mir-16, mir-21, mir-155, caspase3 and bcl2 in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia.

  50. Dey N, Das F, Mariappan MM, Mandal CC, Ghosh-Choudhury N, Kasinath BS, et al. MicroRNA-21 orchestrates high glucose-induced signals to TOR complex 1, resulting in renal cell pathology in diabetes. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(29):25586–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Clausen T. Regulatory role of translocation of Na+-K + pumps in skeletal muscle: hypothesis or reality? Am J Physiology-Endocrinology Metabolism. 2008;295(3):E727–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Corral-Fernandez N, Salgado-Bustamante M, Martinez-Leija M, Cortez-Espinosa N, Garcia-Hernandez M, Reynaga-Hernández E, et al. Dysregulated miR-155 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with type 2 diabetes. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2013;121(06):347–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lin X, Jia J, Du T, Li W, Wang X, Wei J, et al. Overexpression of miR-155 in the liver of transgenic mice alters the expression profiling of hepatic genes associated with lipid metabolism. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0118417.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Mazloom H, Alizadeh S, Pasalar P, Esfahani EN, Meshkani R. Downregulated microRNA-155 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of type 2 diabetic patients is not correlated with increased inflammatory cytokine production. Cytokine. 2015;76(2):403–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lin X, Qin Y, Jia J, Lin T, Lin X, Chen L, et al. MiR-155 enhances insulin sensitivity by coordinated regulation of multiple genes in mice. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(10):e1006308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Lv X, Yao L, Zhang J, Han P, Li C. Inhibition of microRNA-155 sensitizes lung cancer cells to irradiation via suppression of HK2-modulated glucose metabolism. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14(2):1332–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gupta A, Clark R, Kirchner K. Effects of insulin on renal sodium excretion. Hypertension. 1992;19(1supplement):I78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu S, Croniger C, Arizmendi C, Harada-Shiba M, Ren J, Poli V, et al. Hypoglycemia and impaired hepatic glucose production in mice with a deletion of the C/EBPβ gene. J Clin Investig. 1999;103(2):207–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang L, Shao J, Muhlenkamp P, Liu S, Klepcyk P, Ren J, et al. Increased insulin receptor substrate-1 and enhanced skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity in mice lacking CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(19):14173–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Jeoung NH, Harris RA. Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-4 deficiency lowers blood glucose and improves glucose tolerance in diet-induced obese mice. Am J Physiology-Endocrinology Metabolism. 2008;295(1):E46–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Jeoung NH, Harris RA. Role of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 in regulation of blood glucose levels. Korean Diabetes J. 2010;34(5):274–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Jeong JY, Jeoung NH, Park K-G, Lee I-K. Transcriptional regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase. Diabetes Metabolism J. 2012;36(5):328–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Attia RR, Sharma P, Janssen RC, Friedman JE, Deng X, Lee JS, et al. Regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4) by CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBPβ). J Biol Chem. 2011;286(27):23799–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Galic S, Sachithanandan N, Kay TW, Steinberg GR. Suppressor of cytokine signalling (SOCS) proteins as guardians of inflammatory responses critical for regulating insulin sensitivity. Biochem J. 2014;461(2):177–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Radom-Aizik S, Zaldivar F Jr, Oliver S, Galassetti P, Cooper DM. Evidence for microRNA involvement in exercise-associated neutrophil gene expression changes. J Appl Physiol. 2010;109(1):252–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Ghareghani P, Shanaki M, Ahmadi S, Khoshdel AR, Rezvan N, Meshkani R, et al. Aerobic endurance training improves nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) features via miR-33 dependent autophagy induction in high fat diet fed mice. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2018;12(1):80–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gorgani-Firuzjaee S, Meshkani R. SH2 domain-containing inositol 5-phosphatase (SHIP2) inhibition ameliorates high glucose-induced de-novo lipogenesis and VLDL production through regulating AMPK/mTOR/SREBP1 pathway and ROS production in HepG2 cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;89:679–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bories G, Caiazzo R, Derudas B, Copin C, Raverdy V, Pigeyre M, et al. Impaired alternative macrophage differentiation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from obese subjects. Diabetes Vascular Disease Res. 2012;9(3):189–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Silva GJ, Bye A, El Azzouzi H, Wisløff U. MicroRNAs as important regulators of exercise adaptation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;60(1):130–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Klöting N, Berthold S, Kovacs P, Schön MR, Fasshauer M, Ruschke K, et al. MicroRNA expression in human omental and subcutaneous adipose tissue. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3):e4699.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants for their enthusiastic participation in this research.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and Open Access Publishing Fund of the University of Freiburg, Germany.

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

    Zhaleh Pashaei

  2. Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

    Abbas Malandish

  3. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

    Shahriar Alipour

  4. Department of Biological Sciences in sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

    Afshar Jafari

  5. Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    Ismail Laher

  6. Department of Exercise & Sport Science, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Anthony C. Hackney

  7. Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, 359-1192, Japan

    Katsuhiko Suzuki

  8. Department of Sport and Sport Science, Exercise and Human Movement Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

    Urs Granacher

  9. Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Kurdistan, Iran

    Ayoub Saeidi

  10. Movement, Sport, Health and Sciences laboratory (M2S). UFR-STAPS, University of Rennes 2-ENS Cachan, Av. Charles Tillon, Rennes Cedex, 35044, France

    Hassane Zouhal

  11. Institut International des Sciences du Sport (2IS), Irodouer, 35850, France

    Hassane Zouhal

Authors
  1. Zhaleh Pashaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abbas Malandish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shahriar Alipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Afshar Jafari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ismail Laher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anthony C. Hackney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Katsuhiko Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Urs Granacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ayoub Saeidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hassane Zouhal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZP, AS and HZ conceived and designed research. ZP, AM, SA, AJ, and AS conducted experiments and analyzed data. ZP, AM, IL, ACH, KS, UG, AS and HZ wrote the manuscript. ACH, IL, UG and HZ revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhaleh Pashaei, Urs Granacher or Hassane Zouhal.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We confirmed that the experimental protocol was approved by the regional research ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (approval number: 1396.485), and informed consent was obtained from each participant after risks and benefits were explained. The study was conducted in accordance with the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pashaei, Z., Malandish, A., Alipour, S. et al. Effects of HIIT training and HIIT combined with circuit resistance training on measures of physical fitness, miRNA expression, and metabolic risk factors in overweight/obese middle-aged women. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 16, 123 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00904-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00904-7

Keywords

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation

ISSN: 2052-1847

Contact us