Skip to main content
Download PDF

Another market segment: sport event tourism by disabled athletes

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation volume 16, Article number: 120 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Sports and tourism are connected in various parts of economies, cultures, and nations. However, there has been a limited understanding of sports event tourism involving disabled athletes. This study explored the behavioral and socio-demographic implications of the disabled sports event tourism and investigated the motivational factors involved. An in-person survey was administered to 108 disabled athletes who attended the summer and winter Paralympics. A Structural Equation Model was used to determine the association between the factors of life satisfaction, emotional happiness, escapism, perceived value, and future intention, using the Monte Carlo parametric bootstrapping method to test significance of direct and indirect effects. Cronbach was acceptable because it exceeds 0.70 which satisfies the cut-off of confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, the individual values of average variance extracted (AVE), were greater than 0.50 (0.72) which meets the requirement and the convergent validity of all the constructs. The results showed that life satisfaction had a significant direct effect on future intentions. Emotional happiness had a significant direct effect on the perceived value of an event. Escapism had significant direct effects on perceived value and future intentions. Perceived value significantly influenced future intentions. The relationship between emotional happiness and future intention was fully mediated by perceived value. However, the relationship between escapism and future intention was only partially mediated by perceived value. The results of this study are valuable for developing future management and marketing policies for disabled athletes and tourists to advance the existing sports event tourism and disabled athlete’s behavior studies.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Introduction

Sports Event Tourism (SET) is defined as traveling for the specific objective of participating in events or activities related to sports [1]. As indicated in previous studies [2, 3], sports tourism (here SET) has been formally or informally established as a subdiscipline of sports management. As Hudson [4] emphasized, sports event tourism has mostly a positive economic impact on destinations and has been highlighted as one of the most important tools to develop destinations [5]. Furthermore, sports event tourism can be a significant and decidedly sought-after market for destinations [6]. According to Kadam and Deshmukh [7], the global market size of sports (event) tourism was approximately $300 Billion in 2020 and is estimated to triple by 2030. Sports event tourism is interrelated with various parts of economies, cultures, and nations. Sports event can facilitate tourism and destination development by promoting the interests of spectators and stakeholders and contributing to the overall prominence of a destinations’ infrastructure and social exchange [1, 5]. According to Williams et al. [5], it is essential for sporting organizations to develop an actionable framework to stimulate near and longer-term strategic outcomes for destination hosting events. Kim et al. [1] also emphasizes that “A destination brand with strong equity leads to greater commitment in the form of loyalty and willingness to revisit that destination” (p. 1196). However, the studies on SET for destination are very limited in both qualitative and quantitative perspectives [1]. In particular, the studies on SET with and for disabled athletes are still in the infant stage [1, 5, 8, 9] while a few studies have attempted to understand non-disabled athlete’s behavior [1, 5, 10, 11].

The media representation of athletes with disabilities continues to be insufficient, even with just under 20% of the world population reporting a form of disability [12]. Blauwet and Willick [13] emphasized that the life scope and quality of disabled people has significantly improved for the last 30 years. Thus, it is highlighted that the influences of the media (e.g., sports event tourism) and communication practices are essential to raise awareness and challenge the traditional stereotypes of sports and disabilities [14,15,16]. Hua et al. [17] emphasized that some constraints (e.g., interpersonal, injury or cultural) can be overcome through the adoption of different strategies. For example, the participation of athletes with disabilities in the Paralympic Games has had a significant impact on their participation in sports. It has a lot to do with the injuries suffered by athletes with disabilities during Paralympic games. A study has shown that athletes with disabilities have high rates of injury during competition, which is not comparable to that of athletes without disabilities. Media will focus on research into the performance and injury resistance of athletes with disabilities [18]. This means developing methods to increase sports participation among people with disabilities and reduce or prevent injuries while improving performance. Additionally, perceptions of people with disabilities, such as the development of tourism for people with disabilities, may change. The media promotion of disabilities in sporting events (e.g., the Paralympic Games) may have a meaningful effect on social engagement and social sustainability; thus, emphasizing awareness and attracting more disabled athletes is very critical for destination and tourism development [8, 9]. People with disabilities’ exposure to media may improve the perception of disabled people among individuals without disabilities. Although there are some types of research on disabled tourism [19, 20], there has been a limited understanding of sports event tourism, especially by disabled athletes. To enhance the efficacy of sports tourism and destination, this study explores the behavioral and socio-demographic implications of sports events and investigates various related motivational factors of disabled athletes.

The objectives of this study are:

  • To understand any challenges faced by the disabilities during their travel;

  • To propose and examine the conceptual model by understanding the behavior of a disabled athlete at an event through the three-dimensional stages of human behavior: motivational factors, perceived value, and future intention;

  • To validate the proposed model empirically, with collected data;

  • To provide theoretical and practical suggestions to advance the understanding of disabled athletes’ behavior.

The sections that follow discuss the theoretical background of this study, the research protocol used to develop the measurement items and collection of data, the results that show the socio-demographic profiles of the participants, and if the model can be supported. Finally, theoretical, and practical suggestions will be provided for stakeholders, event managers, and athletes with disabilities.

Theoretical background

Disabilities in tourism studies

Many previous tourism studies have emphasized that the disabled have the same or similar needs as people without disabilities and that this includes sports as well as travel [19, 21,22,23,24,25]. An increasing demand by the disabled and their families creates a substantial economic effect on tourism destinations from the growth of their travel spending as their social and financial levels have grown [22, 26]. Tourism becomes one of the most important parts of their life, including their family, with a better understanding and significant increase in social consensus about the disabled [27, 28]. It has been noted that tourism positively influences the lives of disabled individuals and the perceived value provided offers them the opportunity to interact with the non-disabled [29, 30]. It is estimated that over 1 billion individuals worldwide are disabled, or about 15% of the global population [31]. Thus, tourism and its related studies on the disabled are garnering greater interest from the tourism industry and academia. Hua et al. [17] suggested that worldwide, sports tourism is rapidly growing, with individuals with disabilities increasingly a class of tourist in need of attention. Disabled individuals engage in cultures that are primarily established for the able-bodied; thus, many disabled cannot freely engage in leisure activities. Society as a whole, whether disabled or not, requires the enjoyment that sports tourism provides and with varied choices the disabled demonstrate clear and well-defined goals for outdoor sports and leisure activities [17].

The application of the three-stages in consumer behavior model

The study of Consumer behavior is generally centered on how to engage consumers through targeted marketing promotional strategies, such as market segmentation, product differentiation, and distribution management. An understanding of consumer behavior provides a critical indicator of how people assess a given value (e.g., involvement and emotion) and where they should be positioned in consumer and tourism-related studies [32, 33]. It has been acknowledged that human behavior occurs as a process of emotional, physical, and elements which are determined through an individual’s sound and orderly manner of information gathering [34, 35].

This study applies motivation, perceived value, and future intention to measure disabled athletes’ behavior while attending a sporting event. First, the motivation as a pre-visit process in each subject or environment (e.g., people, product, brand, surroundings) which can influence on-site evaluation (i.e., perceived value) [36, 37]. Second, the post-visit behavior (i.e., consumer’s future intention to revisit) can be associated with perceived value [38, 39]. From the review of three stages in consumer behavior, the study proposes of Motivation ? Perceived Value ? Future Intention framework to explore the association between disabled athlete’s experience components before, during, and after trips. In other words, this study proposes that disabled athlete’s behavior is positioned and measured by motivation (cognitive process), then value perception during the event (post-cognitive process), which subsequently influences their future intention (affective-conative process). The proposed model in Fig. 1 examines the relationship among the variables mentioned above.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The proposed conceptual model

Full size image

Motivation

Social and psychological desires are connected to theories explaining the motives for attending sport events [40], with experiences creating positive feelings and emotional states, in addition to providing an awareness of fitting in to a group identity. This gratification can result from watching sporting events and is referred to as the degree spectators obtain entertainment, excitement, and enjoyment from observing a sporting event [40]. The following discusses the three motivation and behavior stages considered for this study:

Motivation for life satisfaction

Tourism experience is closely related to one’s general satisfaction with life [41]. Across different domains in life, tourism and leisure activity can improve individual happiness and quality of life [42,43,44]. Satisfaction is the degree of subjective utility or benefit obtained from the experience of tourism in relation to the economic, temporal, and social costs paid for the experience [45]. Overall, it is measured to examine whether a consumer has reached a state of satisfaction overtime after receiving a specific service [46]. Service satisfaction is derived from the customer’s individual perceptions and attributes of service expectations not resulting from the service itself [47]. Studies have identified positive associations with tourism satisfaction and after the purchase intentions [41]. For instance, Tzetzis et al. [48] noted tourism has a positive influence satisfaction on revisit intention. Yazıcı et al. [49] report that tourism satisfaction positively affects evaluation. Thus, motivation for (life) satisfaction can serve as an important predictor of future behavior, for example consumer intention to revisit. Extending these studies, this study posits disabled athletes can be motivated to have a relaxed, healthy, and pleasing lives by attending sports event tourism, and this life satisfaction motive can be significantly associated with perceived value and future intention. The research hypotheses are as follows:

H1a: Life satisfaction will significantly and positively influence perceived value.

H1b: Life satisfaction will significantly and positively influence revisit intention.

Motivation for emotional happiness

Happiness is a subjective experience that people feel in their life. It is an index measuring how satisfied we are with our life. Jeny and Varghese [50] described psychological happiness as a happy state without satisfaction, achievement, anxiety, and dissatisfaction. Euphoria is a personal tendency to experience positive emotions frequently and avoid experiencing negative emotions. It is an individual’s experience of pleasure, satisfaction, or a positive sense of well-being that we believe for meaningful life [51,52,53,54]. Abou-Zeid et al. [55] reported significant relationships among travel behavior and happiness, suggesting partaking in tourism undertakings can be an important driver of happiness, which in turn is central role to people’s physical and mental wellbeing. Elements of happiness include life satisfaction, subjective well-being, and quality of life [51, 56]. Young and Longman [57] defined happiness as satisfaction with the current living environment and conditions. It is said that happiness is deeply related to physical, mental, and social activities. Siegenthaler and Vaughan [58] stressed that leisure activity participants feel more pleasure and satisfaction than non-participants, and perceived higher quality of life through psychological well-being. Kim et al. [59] offered that tourist personal value and motivation can be efficient indicators of subjective happiness. Sports tourism for the disabled not only provides the disabled with opportunities to meet non-disabled people but also encourage them to compete with non-disabled athletes fairly and equally. Hence, studies have shown that positive emotions are generated through specific leisure experiences such as tourism to improve the overall value of life [60]. Thus, it has been confirmed that positive emotions are generated through specific leisure experiences such as tourism, which eventually improve the overall value of life [60] :

H2a: Emotional happiness will significantly and positively influence perceived value.

H2b: Emotional Happiness will significantly and positively influence future intention.

Motivation for escapism

Escape in sport tourism is a state of being completely engaged in the surrounding environment through active participation in experiential activities [30]. Escape is one of the major factors of motivation in the tourism studies [61]. According to Bello and Etzel [62], tourism is divided into an educational experience area and an area of familiarity and relaxation, and these experience areas include escape, novelty, and entertainment. Cohen [63] also claimed that experiential tourism was a component of escape from ordinary daily life and novelty to experience a new world. In addition, in the study of Oh et al. [64], the aesthetic factor had the highest relevance to the tourism experience, followed by escape. International travel has more and stronger hedonic motivation and satisfaction than domestic travel through escapism [65]. The deviant experience through tourism has a positive effect on perceived values [30], and these values are also used as a moderating variable for behavioral intention and various antecedent factors [54, 66, 67] :

H3a: Escapism will significantly and positively influence perceived value.

H3b: Escapism will significantly and positively influence future intention.

Perceived value

Value (or perceived value) has been defined variously in different concepts and structures. Zeithaml [68] defined it as a general assessment of whether a specific service is appropriate given what tourists perceive to be giving and receiving. In addition, Ezekiel [69] defined it as the difference of benefits a tourist obtains from using a specific service and the tangible and intangible cost paid for using it. The perceived value has been generally measured for monetary assessment, but now it should be assessed for various social concepts and structures. Measurement of a single value has been raised as lacking validity. Multidimensional values such as transaction, acquisition, cost of money, quality, emotional, social, and functional are being developed [70,71,72,73,74]. For instance, Lee et al. [75] developed a tourism program for the demilitarized zone (DMZ) region, a special zone between the two Koreas and divided the perceived value into three sub-values (i.e., overall, functional, and emotional) to measure the recommendations of tourist destinations. By studying the satisfaction of tourism, the result indicated that tourists were satisfied through functional and emotional value. Hwang and Hyun [76] further examined the positive relationship of sports tourism experience with perceived value. Extending the literature, this study proposes a relationship of sporting event tourism perceived value with other underlying factors such as life satisfaction, emotional happiness, and escapism:

H4: Perceived value will significantly and positively influence future intention and mediate relationships among the three motivational factors and Future Intention;

H4a: Perceived value will mediate satisfaction and future intention.

H4b: Perceived value will mediate emotional happiness and future intention.

H4c: Perceived value will mediate escapism and future intention.

Future intention

Studies on tourist’s future intention suggest individuals’ inclination to revisit and deliver positive word-of-mouth. Future intention can greatly influence the decision-making of visitors to visit the place of consumption or the area to be visited [77]. Many previous studies have investigated various factors that have significant impacts on future intentions, including affection, destination image, branding, perceived value, and satisfaction. For instance, Oshimi and Harada [78] identified the positive influence of affection towards the event, image of host city, and image fit on word-of-mouth of international sporting event. Saragi et al. [79] identified the role of destination branding and experiential marketing on tourist future intentions who visited Jakarta Province. Allameh et al. [80] validated the positive relationships between perceived quality and value, destination image, satisfaction, and future intention in the context of sports tourism. Extending these studies, the current research proposes the relationship between satisfaction, emotional happiness, and escapism towards positive future intentions (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Conceptual framework with hypotheses

Full size image

Methodology

Survey and measurement item development

Both measurement and construction of survey questionnaire (i.e., items) are explained in Table 1. The survey was originally written in English and then, translated appropriately into Korea by English certified translating experts Again, all those items were refined and pre-tested by current research team. The reported reliability (i.e., internal consistency) and validation of the instrument have been acceptable and fit in acceptable ranges (See Table 2 for details). Socio-demographic questions, such as gender, age, income, were asked of the sample population (See Table 1). In addition, the study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Korea National Sport University (IRB approval no. 20230921-089) and all participants signed an informed consent form.

Table 1 Construction of research question
Full size table

Data collection

Using an administered survey, we contacted a total of 241 disabled athletes from the South Korean national team for data collection. Among them, 142 provided usable data, and 108 questionnaires were retained for further analysis, representing a response rate of 76.06%. Participants were disabled athletes who participated in the 2020 Tokyo Summer Paralympics or the 2022 Beijing Winter Paralympics in sports such as table tennis, tennis, athletics, bowling, archery, basketball, paragliding, soccer, weightlifting, boccia, swimming, and badminton. The survey clearly explained the objectives and steps of the research and provided a paper-based questionnaire. Data were collected from June 2021 to May 2022. To ensure the rigor of data collection, subjects were recruited from various sources, and the sequence of questionnaire questions was randomly assigned. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. Participants were queried on several aspects, including life satisfaction, emotional happiness, escapism, value, and future intentions. Upon review, 108 questionnaires were deemed complete and usable for analysis.

Data analysis

A Structural Equation Model (SEM) was used to examine the association between the factors of life satisfaction, emotional happiness, escapism, perceived value, and future intention, using the Monte Carlo parametric bootstrapping method (200 iterations) to test significance of direct and indirect effects. SEM is a statistical technique suitable for exploring comprehensive relationships between observed and latent variables within a conceptual model. SEM can minimize measurement errors while simultaneously analyzing the underlying mechanisms, enabling robust and reliable analysis of data consisting of multiple latent items. The analytical procedure necessary for SEM includes confirmatory factor analysis, which tests the reliability and validity of the statistics.

The number of respondents required for SEM depends on various factors such as the effect size, desired statistical power, complexity of the model, expected relationships among variables [81]. A commonly suggested guideline is sample-to-factor ratio of 15:1 or 20:1 [82], which means a minimum of 15 to 20 respondents must be considered for each independent factor in the model. Given that this study utilized five factors with 108 respondents, it is reasonable to conclude that the sample size aligns well with statistical guidelines.

Results

Demographics

Participant demographics are presented in Table 2. Respondents were primarily between 20 and 49 (81.6%) years of age, were more single (51.9%), and predominately male (71.3%). Eight 4% of respondents earned less than $3,000 monthly. More than a half of participants attended sports event tourism 1–2 times a year (60.2%). There were 3.7% of participants who had postgraduate education (See Table 2).

Table 2 Summary of demographics
Full size table

Confirmatory factor analysis

Reliabilities, factor loadings, and fit indices are shown in Table 3. According to Cronbach [83], reliabilities are considered acceptable if alpha exceeds 0.70 and for this study, they exceeded.70, which satisfies the cut-off of confirmatory factor analysis. When considering average variance extracted (AVE), the individual values were greater than 0.50, which meets the requirement and the convergent validity of all the constructs when using structural equation modelling. Factor loadings were greater than 0.40, satisfying discriminant validity. The model χ2 was 528.918 (p < .001) with a CMIN of 2.186, and other fit statistics such as CFI (0.910), NFI (0.848), IFI (0.911), RFI (0.827), and TLI (0.898) suggest at least a moderate fit (See Table 3).

Table 3 Factor loadings, reliabilities, and fit indices
Full size table

Path analysis

Regression weights and direct, indirect, and total effects are shown in Tables, 4, 5, and Fig. 3, respectively. Life satisfaction had a significant direct effect on future intention (p < .05), while non-significant on perceived value. Emotional happiness had a significant direct effect on perceived value (p < .05), while non-significant on future intention. Escapism had significant direct effects on perceived value (p < .01) and future intention (p < .01). The direct effect of perceived value on future intention was significant (p < .05).

Fig. 3
figure 3

SEM overview (Direct effects)

Full size image
Table 4 Regression weights
Full size table

Mediation analysis

The mediation effects of each indirect path are shown in Table 5. First, the path between emotional happiness and future intention was significantly mediated by perceived value (p < .05). The total effect of emotional happiness to future intention became significant due to the presence of the mediator. In other words, the relationship between emotional happiness and future intention was fully mediated by perceived value. Second, the path between escapism and future intention was significantly mediated by perceived value (p < .01). A partial mediation was identified because both the direct (p < .01) and indirect effects (p < .01) were significant. Thus, perceived value accounted for a part of the relationship between escapism and future intention.

Table 5 Direct, indirect, and total effects
Full size table

Discussion

The conceptual model examines and tests the motivations of disabled athletes by using actual data from those who had attended international sport events or competitions (i.e., the 2020 Summer Tokyo and 2022 Beijing Winter Paralympics). The model, we believe, adds new knowledge by offering an innovative examination into the role of disabled athletes’ motivations, perceived value, and future intention how perceived value mediates these two measuring items. The findings of this study extended and confirmed the previous theoretical frameworks by emphasizing the critical research areas in life quality and satisfaction [42,43,44], emotional happiness [55, 60, 84], escapism [30, 61, 62, 65], perceived value [71,72,73,74, 76], and future intention [77, 79, 80, 85]. In particular, the methodology of this study extends tourism research beyond typical statistical measurement. With a significant growth of interest in tourism for disabled people, future research can focus on those subjects to understand and build unique behavioral models. This study proposed and applied the first conceptual model by understanding how disabled tourists are motivated in behavioral process in each stage.

The results of this study provide the following practical implications. From the perspective of SET, this study identified the influence of various pre-visit motivators of disabled athletic attendees on their on-site evaluation and post-visit intentions. The findings of this study suggest that the orientations of these attendees, such as their pre-visit motivations towards life satisfaction, emotional happiness, and escapism, can be closely related to their quality of life, time value, and health. Maybe, more detailed and life-based (e.g., health tourism) travel packages for the disabled athletes will have them motivated more while they are making decision. For example, value-driven approaches (e.g., free admission for disabled athletes if travel with more than three family members) could be another promotional strategies to increase their pre-visit motivation. In particular, hosting country can provide discounts on public transportation for returning visitors. It could be a promising strategy for boosting tourism and fostering positive relationships with revisit tourists. Again, it’s essential to carefully evaluate the potential benefits and drawbacks and consider the long-term sustainability of such initiatives and policies.

From a practical perspective, motivation is also associated with sport tourists’ higher persistence, emotions, the importance in participating, and gratification resulting from the sporting events; consequently, greater focus should be directed to profitable marketing strategies and practices that will influence sport tourists’ self-perceptions. Knowledgeable and determined sport tourists’ views on “getting in shape health benefits;”, “I can do it winning attitude”, “opportunities for better time management,” “traveling to places of interest,” and “chances to do something extraordinary” can be important elements for developing a successful sporting event promotional strategy through increased participants’ involvement [86, 87]. The systematic identification of SET’s impacts need further consideration because the mismatch between the target audience’s motives and the event’s concepts cannot produce a positive enhancement of on-site and post-visit outcomes. Any promotional strategies will enhance future intention of the disabled to attend the event. In addition, sports event organizers in the hosting country/nation should offer disabled athletes more compelling reasons to revisit the destination. For instance, the event organizers or management team could provide returning athletes and their families and friends with tailored touring packages, including opportunities such as locker room tours.

From the educational perspective, the outcomes of this study should lead us to understand how the disabled athletes are motivated to assess the value and plan (i.e., intention) for the next event. Thus, for the DAs, including the non-disabled, it is necessary to understand their behavior by measuring and analyzing their motivational factors. Many studies indicated that experiencing a new culture and learning new information is different in their behavior [88, 89] while any socio-psychological motives in tourism are similar for sport event travelers. In addition, more and additional factors should be studied and explored because sports event tourists experience and learn certain aspects of the foreign destination’s culture such as leisure activities, food, transportation, language, housing, arts, media, currency, and indigenous population [89, 90]. As previous studies have recognized the importance of motivation for understanding travel behaviors before (pre-visit), during (on-site-visit), and after (post-visit) site visits [90, 92], understanding of stakeholder’s motivations, including managers, workers, and residents are very pivotal [93]. In particular, sports event tourism with disabled athletes could be another research area in sport management as discussed earlier [2, 3, 94, 95].

From the marketing perspective, the disabled athlete’s values, including multidimensional values (transaction value, acquisition value, cost-money value, quality and value, emotional value, social value, functional value, etc.) need to be investigated and analyzed. Happiness and life satisfaction will be critical elements to promote disabled athletes and their family. According to Matson-Barkat et al. [96], the DAs would like to share or report their own emotional happiness which mutually empower them and reduce stigma related to disability. Promotional strategies using motivational factors (i.e., happiness and life satisfaction) will increase their intention to revisit in the future while happiness and pride, which eventually enhance self -confidence or actualization, were proved as critical emotions [96]. On the other hand, any marketing tools by inspiring and increasing affective positive feelings will attract an athlete’s tendency to attend sport events. Those marketing and promotional strategies can be maximized through social media. Hayduk and Walker [97] emphasized that it is easy to understand consumers’ demands, including instant reactions through social network communication channels.

Limitations and future study

The results of this study cannot be generalized to a larger population because different ethnic and cultural groups could express varying motivations, values, and intentions. Future studies across countries may broaden the generalizability of tourist’s behavior. The depth of the questions, such as whether a participant has participated in any sporting events, may not have provided deep and rich information. Future studies should include an enhanced and more developed survey with more specific and detailed questions, such as more detailed questions assessing motivations or behavioral factors that lead to positive behavioral intentions.

In summary, the authors believe the proposed model and results can represent a first step in addressing the disabled athletes’ behavior research, but rather the futuristic approach to explore more from disabled tourists’ perspectives. Furthermore, the results from the proposed model may be useful in strategic planning for the sports events for the disabled (e.g., Paralympics) and its strategy for marketing and management.

Conclusion

The study was designed to assess the disabled’s behavior while they are attending sporting events. The results of the study showed significant findings and particularly, the significant mediation effect of perceived value on future intention to visit. The overall results demonstrated that three motivations (i.e., life satisfaction, emotional happiness, and escapism), perceived value, and future intention have a strong and significant relationship. From a theoretical perspective, three stages of behavior (cognitive-affective-conative) were utilized to understand athlete’s behavior by integrating a theoretical framework. The proposed model was conceptually developed to understand consumer’s behavior (i.e., disabled athletes) by utilizing the cognitive-affective-conative stages and integrating theoretical framework. Interestingly, new term, “motivation for life satisfaction” was developed, modified, measured, and applied for the study. The item, “satisfaction” is generally measured for the affective stage. The finding of this study contributes to the existing sports event tourism and disabled athlete’s behavior studies in many ways.

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Kim YH, Hongxin L, Nauright J. A destination development by building a brand image and sport event tourism: A case of sport city in USA. Sport in Society. 2018;21(8):1196–1203. http://doi.org/080/17430437.2018.1450718.

  2. Babiak K, Thibault L, Willem A. Mapping research on interorganizational relationships in sport management: current landscape and future research prospects. J Sport Manage. 2018;32(3):272–94. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2017-0099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McCullough BP, Orr M, Kellison T. Sport ecology: conceptualizing an emerging subdiscipline within sport management. J Sport Manage. 2020;34(6):509–20. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2019-0294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hudson S. Sport and adventure tourism. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Haworth Hospitality; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams GB, Kim YH, Nauright J. Destination development by sport event tourism (SET): a case study of Thailand. Sport Soc. 2021;24(10):1827–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2021.1916234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hinch T, Jackson EL, Hudson S, Walker G. Leisure constraint theory and sport tourism. Sport Soc. 2005;8(2):142–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430500087435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sports tourism market by product (Football/Soccer, Cricket, Motorsport, Tennis, and others), type (Domestic and International), and category (active and passive): Global opportunity analysis and industry forecast 2021–2030, Kadam A, Deshmukh R. 2023. https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/sports-tourism-market-A13076 [Assessed on 7 July 2023].

  8. Kolotouchkina O. Engaging citizens in sports mega-events: the participatory strategic approach of Tokyo 2020 olympics. Communication Soc. 2018;31(4):45–58. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.31.4.45-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pullen E, Silk M. Gender, technology and the ablenational paralympic body politic. Cult Stud. 2020;34(3):466–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2019.1621917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersson T, Getz D. Specialization versus diversification in the event portfolios of amateur athletes. Scandinavian J Hospitality Tourism. 2020;20(4):376–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2020.1733653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fotiadis A, Xie L, Li Y, Huan TCT. Attracting athletes to small-scale sports events using motivational decision-making factors. J Bus Res. 2016;69(11):5467–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kolotouchkina O, Llorente-Barroso C, García-Guardia ML, Pavón J. Disability, sport, and television: media visibility and representation of Paralympic games in news programs. Sustainability. 2020;13(1):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blauwet C, Willick S. The paralympic movement: using sports to promote health, disability rights, and social integration for athletes with disabilities. Am Acad Phys Med Rehabilitation. 2012;4(11):851–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.08.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hardin M, Hardin B. The ‘supercrip; in sport media: wheelchair athletes discuss hegemony’s disabled hero. Sociol Sport Online. 2004;7(1):8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson D, Trevisan F, Pullen E, Silk M. Towards a social justice disposition in communication and sport scholarship. Communication Sport. 2020;8(4–5):435–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/216747952093292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McPherson G, O’Donnell H, McGillivray D, Misener L. Elite athletes or superstars? Media representation of para-athletes at the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth games. Disabil Soc. 2016;31(5):659–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1197823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hua KP, Ibrahim I, Chiu LK. Sport tourism: physically-disabled sport tourists’ orientation. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2013;91:257–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Song Y, Zhang W, Zhao L, Sun D, Huang Y, Gu Y. Sports-related injuries sustained by disabled athletes in Winter Paralympic games: a systematic review. J Med Imaging Health Inf. 2020;10(5):1136–43. https://doi.org/10.1166/jmihi.2020.3012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blichfeldt BS, Nicolaisen J. Disabled travel: not easy, but doable. Curr Issues Tourism. 2011;14(1):79–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500903370159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moura A, Eusébi C, Devile E. The ‘why’and ‘what for’of participation in tourism activities: travel motivations of people with disabilities. Curr Issues Tourism. 2022;1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2044292.

  21. Darcy D. Marginalized participation: physical disability, high support needs and tourism. J Hospitality Tourism Manage. 2002;9(1):61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Darcy S. Dis-embodied air travel experiences: disability, discrimination and the effect of a discontinuous air travel chain. J Hospitality Tourism Manage. 2012;19:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/jht.2012.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huh C, Singh AJ. Families traveling with a disabled member: analyzing the potential of an emerging niche market segment. Tourism Hospitality Res. 2007;7:212–29. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.thr.605004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shaw G, Coles T. Disability, holiday making and the tourism industry in the U.K.: a preliminary survey. Tour Manag. 2004;25:397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00139-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith RW. Leisure of disabled tourists: barriers to travel. Annals Tourism Res. 1987;14(3):376–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(87)90109-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Darcy S, Cameron B, Dwyer L, Taylor T, Wong E, Thomson A. Technical report 90040: Visitor accessibility in urban centers. Gold Coast: Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre (2008).

  27. McKercher B, Packer T, Yau MK, Lam P. Travel agents as facilitators or inhibitors of travel: perceptions of people with disabilities. Tour Manag. 2003;24:465–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00107-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Misener L, McGillivray D, McPherson G, Legg D. Leveraging parasport events for sustainable community participation: the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth games. Annals Leisure Res. 2015;18(4):450–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2015.1045913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Misener L, Di Lu L, Carlisi R. Leveraging events to develop collaborative partnerships: examining the formation and collaborative dynamics of the Ontario Parasport Legacy Group. J Sport Manage. 2020;34(5):447–61. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2019-0283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pine BJ, Gilmore JH. The experience economy: work is theatre & every business a stage. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Disability and health. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health (2023).

  32. Mothersbaugh DL, Hawkins DI, Kleiser SB, Mothersbaugh LL, Watson CF. Consumer behavior: building marketing strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Santos V, Ramos P, Sousa B, Almeida N, Valeri M. Factors influencing touristic consumer behavior. J Organizational Change Manage. 2021;35(3):409–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wilkie WL. Consumer behavior. New York: Wiley; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Frías-Jamilena DM, Castañeda‐García JA, Del Barrio‐García S. Self‐congruity and motivations as antecedents of destination perceived value: the moderating effect of previous experience. Int J Tourism Res. 2019;21(1):23–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Suhartanto D, Brien A, Primiana I, Wibisono N, Triyuni NN. Tourist loyalty in creative tourism: the role of experience quality, value, satisfaction, and motivation. Curr Issues Tourism. 2020;23(7):867–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1568400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jeong Y, Kim S. A study of event quality, destination image, perceived value, tourist satisfaction, and destination loyalty among sport tourists. Asia Pac J Mark Logistics. 2020;32(4):940–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-02-2019-0101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim S, Kim S. Perceived values of TV drama, audience involvement, and behavioral intention in film tourism. J Travel Tourism Mark. 2018;35(3):259–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2016.1245172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown G, Assaker G, Reis A. Visiting Fortaleza: motivation, satisfaction, and revisit intentions of spectators at the Brazil 2014 FIFA World Cup. J Sport Tourism. 2018;22(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775085.2017.1417889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen CC, Huang WJ, Petrick JF. Holiday recovery experiences, tourism satisfaction and life satisfaction-Is there a relationship? Tour Manag. 2016;53:140–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dolnicar S, Yanamandram V, Cliff K. The contribution of vacations to quality of life. Annals Tourism Res. 2012;39(1):59–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.04.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. McCabe S, Johnson S. The happiness factor in tourism: subjective well-being and social tourism. Annals Tourism Res. 2013;41:42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sirgy MJ, Kruger PS, Lee DJ, Yu GB. How does a travel trip affect tourists’ life satisfaction? J Travel Res. 2011;50(3):261–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510362784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Beard JG, Ragheb MG. Measuring leisure satisfaction. J Leisure Res. 1980;12(1):20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1980.11969416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Oliver RL. Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: McGraw Hill; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cameran M, Moizer P, Pettinicchio A. Customer satisfaction, corporate image, and service quality in professional services. Service Industries J. 2010;30:421–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060802236111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tzetzis G, Alexandris K, Kapsampeli S. Predicting visitors’ satisfaction and behavioral intentions from service quality in the context of a small-scale outdoor sport event. Int J Event Festival Manage. 2014;5(1):4–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-04-2013-0006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yazıcı T, Koçak S, Altunsöz IH. Examining the effect of experiential marketing on behavioral intentions in a festival with a specific sport event. Eur Sport Manage Q. 2017;17(2):171–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2016.1247903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jeny R, Varghese P. Spiritual correlates of psychological well-being. Indian Streams Res J. 2013;3(7):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Brülde B. Happiness theories of the good life. J Happiness Stud. 2007;8(1):15–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9003-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Diener E, Lucas RE. Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory. J Happiness Stud. 2000;1(1):41–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010076127199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Loureiro SMC. The role of the rural tourism experience economy in place attachment and behavioral intentions. Int J Hospitality Manage. 2014;40:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Yuksel A, Yuksel F, Bilim Y. Destination attachment: effects on customer satisfaction and cognitive, affective, and conative loyalty. Tour Manag. 2010;31(2):274–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Abou-Zeid M, Witter R, Bierlaire M, Kaufmann V, Ben-Akiva M. Happiness and travel mode switching: findings from a Swiss public transportation experiment. Transp Policy. 2012;19(1):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.09.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sirgy MJ, Cornwell T. How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Soc Indic Res. 2002;59(1):79–114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016021108513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Young J, Longman J. Quality of life and persons with melanoma: a pilot study. Cancer Nurs. 1983;6(3):219–26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.843611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Siegenthaler KL, Vaughan J. Older women in retirement communities: perceptions of recreation and leisure. Leisure Sci. 1998;20(1):53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409809512264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kim H, Lee S, Uysal M, Kim J, Ahn K. Nature-based tourism: motivation and subjective well-being. J Travel Tourism Mark. 2015;32(1):76–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2014.997958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sirgy MJ, Lee DJ, Rahtz D. Research on consumer well-being (CWB): overview of the field and introduction to the special issue. J Macromarketing. 2007;27(4):341–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146707307212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lew A, Hall M, Williams AM. A companion to tourism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  62. Bello DC, Etzel MJ. The role of novelty in the pleasure travel experience. J Travel Res. 1985;24(1):20–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728758502400104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Cohen E. A phenomenology of Tourist experiences. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem; 1979.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  64. Oh H, Fiore AM, Jeoung M. Measuring experience economy concepts: tourism applications. J Travel Res. 2007;46(2):119–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287507304039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ponsignon F, Lunardo R, Michrafy M. Why are international visitors more satisfied with the tourism experience? The role of hedonic value, escapism, and psychic distance. J Travel Res. 2021;60(8):1771–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520961175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Monroe K. Pricing: making profitable decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Parasuraman A, Grewal D. The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: a research agenda. J Acad Mark Sci. 2000;28(1):168–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zeithaml VA. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark. 1988;52(3):2–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ezekiel TE. Marketing strategies and consumers satisfaction of cement products in Calabar Nigeri. Br J Mark Stud. 2014;2(6):52–67.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gallarza MG, Saura IG. Value dimensions, perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: an investigation of university students’ travel behaviour. Tour Manag. 2006;27(3):437–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Grewal D, Krishnan R, Baker J, Borin N. The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers’ evaluations and purchase intentions. J Retailing. 1998;74(3):331–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80099-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Sanchez J, Callarisa L, Rodriguez RM, Moliner MA. Perceived value of the purchase of a tourism product. Tour Manag. 2006;27(3):394–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Sweeney JC, Soutar GN. Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale. J Retailing. 2001;77(2):203–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Woodruff RB, Gardial SF. Customer value: the next source for competitive edge. J Acad Mark Sci. 1997;25(2):139–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Lee CK, Yoon YS, Lee SK. Investigating relationships among perceived value, satisfaction, and recommendations: the case of the Korean DMZ. Tour Manag. 2007;28(1):204–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.12.017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Hwang J, Hyun SS. Perceived firm innovativeness in cruise travelers’ experience and perceived luxury value: the moderating effect of advertising effectiveness. Asia Pac J Tourism Res. 2016;21:101–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2015.1016051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Echtner CM, Ritchie JR. The meaning and measurement of destination image. J Tourism Stud. 2003;14(1):37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759303100402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Oshimi D, Harada M. The effects of city image, event fit, and word-of-mouth intention towards the host city of an international sporting event. Int J Sport Manage Recreation Tourism. 2016;24(6):76–96. https://doi.org/10.5199/ijsmart-1791-874X-24d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Saragi H, Hady H, Segoro W. Determinant factors of word of mouth and its implications on revisit intention of tourism to province of DKI Jakarta. Int J Hospitality Tourism Syst. 2021;14(2):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Allameh SM, Pool JK, Jaberi A, Salehzadeh R, Asadi H. Factors influencing sport tourists’ revisit intentions: the role and effect of destination image, perceived quality, perceived value, and satisfaction. Asia Pac J Mark Logistics. 2015;27(2):191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 8th ed. United Kingdom: Cengage Learning; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Memon MA, Ting H, Cheah JH, Thurasamy R, Chuah F, Cham TH. Sample size for survey research: review and recommendations. J Appl Struct Equation Model. 2020;4(2):1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Trenberth L. The role, nature and purpose of leisure and its contribution to individual development and well-being. Br J Guidance Counselling. 2005;33(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880412331335849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Park J, Kim M, Nauright J, Kim YH. Sport event tourists’ (SET’s) behavior: a case study of the PyeongChang Winter olympics. Int J Sports Mark Spons. 2019;21(2):267–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-09-2019-0101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Darcy S, McKercher B, Schweinsberg S. From tourism and disability to accessible tourism: a perspective article. Tourism Rev. 2020;75(1):140–4. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-07-2019-0323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Dickson TJ, Misener L, Darcy S. Enhancing destination competitiveness through disability sport event legacies: developing an interdisciplinary typology. Int J Contemp Hospitality Manage. 2017;29(3):924–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2015-0530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Edelheim J. How should tourism education values be transformed after 2020? Tourism Geographies. 2020;22(3):547–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1760927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. González-García RJ, Añó-Sanz V, Parra-Camacho D, Calabuig-Moreno F. Perception of residents about the impact of sports tourism on the community: analysis and scale-validation. J Phys Educ Sport. 2018;18(1):149–56. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2018.01019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Funk DC, Bruun TJ. The role of socio-psychological and culture education motives in marketing international sport tourism: a cross-cultural perspective. Tour Manag. 2007;28(3):806–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.05.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Tribe J, Liburd JJ. The tourism knowledge system. Annals Tourism Res. 2016;57:44–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.11.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Qiao G, Ding L, Zhang L, Yan H. Accessible tourism: a bibliometric review (2008–2020). Tourism Rev. 2022;77(3):713–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-12-2020-0619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Cavagnaro E, Staffieri S, Postma A. Understanding millennials’ tourism experience: values and meaning to travel as a key for identifying target clusters for youth (sustainable) tourism. J Tourism Futures. 2018;4(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-12-2017-0058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Park J, Suh YI, Pedersen PM. Examining spectator motivations in Major League Baseball: a comparison between senior and non-senior consumers. Choregia. 2016;12(2):13–32. https://doi.org/10.4127/ch.2016.0110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Rode C, Sebby A, Jordan K. Perceptions of destination image and effects on college football fans: a case study of conference realignment. Archives Bus Res. 2018;6(10):234–49. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.610.5371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Matson-Barkat S, Puncheva-Michelotti P, Koetz C, Hennekam S. Destigmatisation through social sharing of emotions and empowerment: the case of disabled athletes and consumers of disability sports. J Bus Res. 2022;149:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Hayduk T, Walker M. The effect of ownership marketing expertise on MLB attendance and digital consumption. Sport Mark Q. 2021;30(1):30–46. https://doi.org/10.32731/SMQ.301.032021.03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the 2022 Yeungnam University Research Grant.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sangyung Lee and Young Hoon Kim contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Special Physical Education, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-Si, 38541, Korea

    Seokmin Yun

  2. Department of Adapted Physical Education, Korea National Sport University, Seoul, 05541, Korea

    Kyungjin Kim

  3. National Institute of Green Technology, Seoul, 07328, Korea

    Sangyung Lee

  4. School of Business, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, 29424, USA

    Young Hoon Kim

Authors
  1. Seokmin Yun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kyungjin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sangyung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Young Hoon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y. and Y.K.; Methodology, Y.K.; Software, S.L.; Formal analysis, Y.K.; Investigation, S.Y. and K.K.; Resources, S.Y. and K.K.; Data curation, S.Y. and K.K.; Writing-review and editing, Y.K. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyungjin Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Research involving human participants, human material, or human data, must have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and must have been approved by an appropriate ethics committee. This study approved by the Institutional Review Board of Korea National Sport University (IRB approval no. 20230921-089).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yun, S., Kim, K., Lee, S. et al. Another market segment: sport event tourism by disabled athletes. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 16, 120 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00914-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00914-5

Keywords

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation

ISSN: 2052-1847

Contact us