Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effects of exercise intervention on balance function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation volume 16, Article number: 164 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of exercise intervention on postural balance, gait parameters, and muscle strength in children with cerebral palsy by quantifying the information from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

We conducted a systematical search for RCTs from the databases, including PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus using a between-group design involving children with cerebral palsy and assessing the effect of exercise intervention on postural balance, gait parameters, and muscle strength. The specified inclusion criteria were determined by the PICOS tool. The outcomes of included studies were evaluated by meta-analysis, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to analyze the observed heterogeneities using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata version 18.0. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was used to evaluate the risk of bias and quality of the included studies.

Results

Twenty-four studies were included in this meta-analysis, with 579 children with cerebral palsy. Exercise intervention showed a statistically significant favorable effect on gross motor function (SMD = 0.32; 95%CI [0.03 to 0.61]; I2 = 16%), anteroposterior stability index (SMD = -0.93; 95%CI [-1.69 to -0.18]; I2 = 80%), and mediolateral stability index (SMD = -0.60; 95%CI [-1.16 to -0.03]; I2 = 73%) compared to control group among children with cerebral palsy. None of the above meta-analyses exhibited publication bias, as indicated by Egger’s test with p-values greater than 0.05 for all.

Conclusions

Exercise is effective in improving gross motor function and balance in children with cerebral palsy. Due to the lack of studies examining the efficacy of each exercise type, we are unable to provide definitive training recommendations.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cerebral palsy (CP) refers to a group of permanent disorders affecting the development of movement and posture, leading to limitations in activity. These disorders are attributed to non-progressive disturbances in the developing fetal or infant brain [1]. CP frequently presents with motor problems, commonly accompanied by sensory, cognitive, communication, perceptual, and/or behavioral disorders [2,3,4]. Additionally, individuals with CP may also experience seizures, nutritional issues, dysphagia, and oral motor dysfunction, resulting in a subsequent decrease in physical activity and overall quality of life [5,6,7]. Consequently, individuals with CP depend on a multitude of health and educational services [8, 9]. The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) is a functional classification system that categorizes children and youth with CP based on their current gross motor skills and limits, as well as their requirement for assistive technology [10]. GMFCS I often exhibit unrestricted ambulation, however may encounter certain limitations in more demanding circumstances. GMFCS V typically have significant mobility impairments, often necessitating the use of assistive equipment to facilitate movement. Neural plasticity makes the early years crucial for children’s motor function development [11].

The rehabilitation of balance and walking ability is crucial for children diagnosed with cerebral palsy [12, 13]. Balance refers to the capacity to sustain an upright position or vertical alignment while engaging in various activities, including sitting, standing, and walking [14, 15]. It is contingent upon the intricate interplay of the central nervous system, musculature, physical power, proprioception, body alignment, visual perception, and the vestibular system [16,17,18]. The significance of early intervention in optimizing long-term functionality in children with CP and their prospects for leading a fulfilling life has been extensively recognized [19, 20]. The progression of intervention has shifted the focus from primarily addressing the underlying symptoms and impairments to improve function, to instead focusing on training activities and real-life tasks that hold significance to the individual [12]. In addition, there is a requirement to promote increased engagement in exercise, in line with recommendations, to attain elevated levels of fitness, diminish risk factors for diseases, and minimize subsequent problems such as premature functional decline [21]. Exercise programs for cerebral palsy exhibit significant variation in terms of their types, such as gait training, body-weight–supported treadmill training, balance training, or multi-component approaches, and the efficacy of different exercises has not been established in improving the functional abilities of children with cerebral palsy [13, 22,23,24].

Currently, several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated the potential impact of exercise interventions on children with CP. A meta-analysis by Liang et al. has illustrated that exercise interventions have a significant effect on higher levels of gait speed and muscle strength and no impact on gross motor function, including 834 children with CP for quantitative analysis [25]. Another meta-analysis involving 847 children and adolescents with spastic CP from 27 studies has shown positive effects on muscle strength, balance, gait speed, or gross motor function in strength training programs [26]. Nevertheless, despite being administered appropriately, strength training did not demonstrate efficacy in enhancing gait speed in a meta-analysis of rehabilitation interventions among children with CP [27]. And aerobic exercise was not effective for muscle strength, spasticity, gait parameters, and quality of life in aerobic exercise meta-analysis on the functioning and quality of life of children and adolescents with CP [28]. However, results regarding balance are rarely reported. Existing evidence suggests that balance plays a crucial role in the capacity to walk independently and is a substantial predictor of gait function [14]. Therefore, it is important to clarify the effectiveness of exercise interventions for balance function in children with CP.

Additionally, the application of meta-analysis can help address and close several important knowledge gaps by: (1) offering solid proof of the impact of exercise intervention on functional balance abilities in children with cerebral palsy and (2) offering suggestions for the efficacy of exercise regimens as protocols to boost postural balance, gait parameters, and muscle strength.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the effect of different exercises on cerebral palsy in children. This knowledge is crucial for guiding clinical practice for the exercise intervention of children with cerebral palsy.

Methods

This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [29] and has been registered in the PROSPERO database with the ID: CRD42024501866.

Search strategy

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus databases using the following search terms: “cerebral palsy” AND “children” AND “exercise” AND “balance” from their inception date to Jan 31, 2024. The specifics regarding the search terms and processes are shown in supplementary Table 1. Two reviewers (JJX and LHL) evaluated the identified publications separately to determine their eligibility. Any conflicts were handled by a third reviewer (NT).

Selection criteria

The studies were eligible for inclusion based on the specified inclusion criteria by PICOS tool [30]: (P) population: participants were children under the age of 18 years with CP; (I) intervention: the included studies were any type of exercise intervention; (C) Comparator: the potential comparators for this study included a control group with conventional therapy; (O) outcomes: postural balance, gait parameters, and muscle strength were outcomes of this study; (S) study type: the included studies were all RCTs trials.

Publications that met the following criteria were not included: (1) The following were excluded: reviews, comments, letters, animal studies, protocols, conference papers, and case reports. (2) The study compared two different exercise interventions. (3) Studies with inadequate data or unavailable statistical analysis were excluded. (4) Cross-over trials were excluded.

Two reviewers (JJX and LHL) autonomously completed the initial screening of titles and abstracts, then thoroughly examined full-text publications using EndNote X9 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA). Discrepancies were resolved by seeking input from a third reviewer (NT).

Data extraction

Two separate authors (NT and JJX) with the check of a third reviewer (LHL) extracted the following data from the included studies: author, the year of publication, the study design, participants, age, sex, weight, height, BMI, sample size, the training protocol, classification of cerebral palsy, and outcomes (postural balance, gait parameters, and muscle strength).

Risk of bias assessment

The Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0 tool [31] was used to evaluate the risk of bias (ROB) for primary outcomes in RCTs by two reviewers (JJX and LHL), including 7 domains: randomized sequence generation, treatment allocation concealment, blinding of participants, personnel, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other sources of bias. Each item can be evaluated as low, unclear, or high risk of bias based on the RCTs by RevMan 5.4. Discrepancies were discussed and resolved by seeking a third reviewer (NT).

Data synthesis and statistical analysis

The effect size of the control and intervention groups with exercise intervention was calculated using the standard mean differences (SMD) and standard deviation (SD) of outcome variables. To determine the SMD and its SD in the control and intervention groups, we used the following formula: (1) mean = mean post-mean baseline, (2) SD = square root ((SDbaseline)2 + (SDpost)2) − (2r × SDbaseline × SDpost)), r = 0.5.

The statistical analysis was performed using the Cochrane Review Manager 5.4. The SMD, SD, and number of participants in the experimental and control groups were entered into RevMan 5.4 to calculate the effect size in the completed experiments. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated by using I2 statistics in all analyses. The random-effects model was utilized when the I2 statistic exceeded 50%. Alternatively, the fixed-effects model was employed.

Publication bias was identified through the use of a funnel plot. Afterward, Egger regression was utilized to evaluate the asymmetry of the funnel plot utilizing Stata version 18.0. A p-value less than 0.05 indicated the lack of publishing bias. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the reliability of the overall estimate by excluding individual studies using Stata version 18.0.

Results

Study identification

We conducted a search across three databases, resulting in the identification of 887 publications. Afterward, we evaluated them, selecting 24 papers [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55] for systematic review and meta-analysis (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of studies search and screen

Full size image

Study characteristics

This meta-analysis included 579 children (age range: 2.5–16.0 years) with cerebral palsy from 24 studies (Exercise intervention, n = 294; Control, n = 285). Gross motor function measure (GMFM) [33, 36, 37, 43, 46, 49, 53, 55], mobility [33, 43, 46,47,48,49, 52, 55] and postural balance [32, 37, 38, 41,42,43, 47, 50] were assessed in 8 studies, and gait speed [32, 36, 48, 53] and muscle strength [33, 38, 46, 48] were assessed in 4 studies. The research was conducted in multiple countries worldwide: Egypt [32, 35, 38, 39], New Zealand [33], Turkey [34, 46, 47, 52, 55], Greece [36], Denmark [37], Chile [40], Spain [41], Brazil [42, 43], India [44, 50], South Africa [45], Thailand [48], USA [49, 51], and France [53, 54]. The main characteristics and exercise protocol of the included studies are shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2.

Table 1 Main characteristics of included RCTs
Full size table

Risk of bias assessment

The overview of the risk of bias in the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0 tool in Figs. 2 and 3. And all included studies showed a low risk of bias in attrition bias and reporting bias. In Fig. 3, eleven studies are shown that present a high risk of bias in performance bias. The performance bias was significant due to the difficulty in masking subjects to group allocation during supervising training by therapists. Overall, the quality assessment indicated that all included studies had a low or moderate risk of bias.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review author’s judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review author’s judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study

Full size image

Meta-analysis

GMFM

The meta-analysis in eight [33, 36, 37, 43, 46, 49, 53, 55] studies found a significant pooled effect of exercise on gross motor function compared to non-intervention or conventional therapy in children with cerebral palsy (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.61, p = 0.03; heterogeneity: I2 = 16%; Chi2 = 8.35; p = 0.30) in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: gross motor function measure (GMFM). 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; SD: standard deviation; IV: inverse variance

Full size image

Gait speed

Figure 5 displays the inclusion of 97 children with cerebral palsy from four studies [32, 36, 48, 53]. The result indicated that gait speed was not improved with exercise compared to non-intervention or conventional therapy (SMD = 1.05, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.49, p < 0.00001), and there was significant heterogeneity (I2 = 50%, p = 0.11) in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: gait speed. 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; SD: standard deviation; IV: inverse variance

Full size image

Mobility

Eight studies [33, 43, 46,47,48,49, 52, 55] conducted analyses to assess the impact of exercise on mobility in children with cerebral palsy in Fig. 6. The combined results of the eight trials demonstrated a significant increase in mobility in the exercise group compared to the control groups. The standardized mean difference was−0.47, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from−1.20 to 0.25. The p-value was 0.20, indicating an insignificant difference. There was a high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 79%), and the chi-square test yielded a value of 33.01 with a p-value of less than 0.0001.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: mobility. 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; SD: standard deviation; IV: inverse variance

Full size image

Muscle strength

The effect of exercise intervention on muscle strength was investigated and is shown in Fig. 7. The pooled analysis showed that exercise could not significantly improve muscle strength (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI−0.05 to 1.37, p = 0.07; heterogeneity: I2 = 62%; Chi2 = 7.92; p = 0.05), compared to the control group.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Forest plot of comparison: muscle strength. 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; SD: standard deviation; IV: inverse variance

Full size image

Postural balance

Anteroposterior and mediolateral stability index were assessed, and the forest plot were depicted in Fig. 8A and B. Figure 8A demonstrates that the exercise had a substantial impact (Z = 2.42 (p = 0.02)) on improving balance in the anteroposterior (A/P) stability index. Similarly, the mediolateral (M/L) stability index exhibited a substantial alteration (Fig. 8B) (Z = 2.08 (p = 0.04)). There was a high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 80% and 73%), and the chi-square test yielded a value of 30.57 and 25.69 with a p-value of less than 0.0001 and 0.0006, respectively.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Forest plot of comparison: anteroposterior (A/P) stability index (A), and mediolateral (M/L) stability index (B). 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; SD: standard deviation; IV: inverse variance

Full size image

Publication bias and sensitivity analyses

Funnel plots for GMFM, gait speed, mobility, muscle strength, A/P SI, and M/L SI are shown in supplementary Fig. 1. Sensitivity analysis of gait speed, mobility, muscle strength, A/P SI, and M/L SI indicated that our results were not significantly influenced by any singular study in supplementary Fig. 3. Begg’s test and Egger’s test showed no evidence of publication bias in GMFM (p = 0.902; p = 0.115), gait speed (p = 1.000; p = 0.507), mobility (p = 0.902; p = 0.718), muscle strength (p = 1.000; p = 0.999), A/P SI (p = 0.548; p = 0.133), and M/L SI (p = 0.386; p = 0.765) in supplementary Fig. 2.

Discussion

This meta-analysis of RCTs assessed the efficacy of exercise interventions on postural balance, gait parameters, and muscle strength in children with CP. This systematic review and meta-analysis included 24 studies involving 579 children (age range: 2.5–16.0 years) with CP (Exercise intervention, n = 294; Control, n = 285). This meta-analysis revealed that exercise interventions are not associated with improved gait speed and muscle strength in children with cerebral palsy but with increased balance function and gross motor function and balance.

Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have previously been conducted to investigate the efficacy of exercise interventions for patients diagnosed with CP. Evaluating gross motor function is crucial in a rehabilitation program for individuals with CP. In our meta-analysis, there was an improvement of GMFM by exercise intervention (p = 0.03), involving eight studies. In a review by Saquetto et al., there is also a significant improvement in GMFM E (MD = 2.97, 95% CI 0.07 to 5.86, p = 0.04), but no effect in GMFM (MD = 6.34, 95% CI−1.37 to 14.06, p = 0.11) by whole-body vibration, involving only two studies [56]. Enhancing a child’s gait is often the primary therapeutic objective for those with developmental disabilities [57]. There was no significant improvement in gait speed in our meta-analysis and no significant improvement in the other two studies of gait training [27] (MD = 0.92, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.66, p = 0.01) and whole-body vibration [56] (MD = 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.2, p = 0.0008). Balance is a crucial determinant of one’s ability to walk independently. In our study, the anteroposterior stability index and the mediolateral stability index are direct indicators used to evaluate the function of postural stability. Exercise intervention (A/P SI: p = 0.02; M/L SI: p = 0.04) and VR intervention [58] (SMD = 0.47, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.66, p < 0.00001) all have positive effects for children with CP. In a similar meta-analysis of exercise interventions for children with CP, exercise interventions (27 trials, including 834 children with CP) had no significant effect on gross motor function and were associated with higher levels of gait speed and muscle strength [25]. The potential reason for this result could be a search strategy about balance function in our mate-analysis, and further RCTs are needed to verify this result.

The beneficial effects of exercise interventions for children with CP may be associated with several possible mechanisms. CP causes a loss of muscular strength and bodily function by injury to the central nervous system, and muscle is a very pliable tissue that is also severely affected [59]. Resistance training, treadmill training, or combination training all involved some form of resistance training that aimed to improve muscle strength, power, or length deficits [60]. Resistance training interventions in children with CP can lead to muscle hypertrophy [61], increase muscle fiber diameter and muscle fiber length following the greater the number of actin-myosin interactions to contribute its strength [62]. Exercise can significantly enhance bodily balance by increasing the interplay between the neurological system and the muscles [63]. This collective endeavor encompasses interconnected systems, including the brain, neurons, and muscles [64]. Aerobic exercises, such as jogging and swimming, can stimulate neuronal activity, while strength training, such as weightlifting and using supports, can improve muscle coordination [65].

Among the 24 included studies, mostparticipants are above ten years old. Thus, early intervention is critical in maximizing long-term functionality in children with CP [20]. In addition, CP can lead to further complications, including limb stiffness, muscle strength weakness, muscular atrophy, skeletal abnormalities, and developmental coordination difficulties [18]. Balance training, treadmill training, whole-body vibration, Wii-Fit balance training, and robotic-assisted gait training are commonly related to developing balance function [30, 34, 37, 50, 51]. More importantly, exercise dosage, safety, and nervous system development should be focused on exercise intervention for children with CP.

Strengths and limitations

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of exercise intervention with comprehensive related outcomes in children with CP. We expanded the associated outcomes, including GMFM, muscle strength, mobility, gait speed, A/P SI, and M/L SI. Furthermore, exercise may serve as the clinical practice guideline for children with CP. This study has some limitations that should be noted: (1) We did not determine the specific exercise type for children with CP. (2) Due to the partition difficulty of variables about age, duration, and exercise type, we did not report subgroup analysis in this manuscript. Further recommendations on the optimal exercise protocol were limited. (3) Increased heterogeneity may also be caused by factors that are not assessed or reported measurement mistakes and poor research plan execution. (4) We only used three databases and did not search other databases (e.g., CINAHL, PEDro, etc.), which needed more comprehensiveness of the search. Future research should concentrate on rigorous RCTs, standardizing measuring methods, expanding the number of participants, and improving experimental design to decrease heterogeneity and increase the valid evidence.

Conclusions

The present systematic review and meta-analysis present evidence that exercise significantly improves gross motor function and balance in children with cerebral palsy. This review enhances the significance and relevance of exercise, especially in balance for children with cerebral palsy. These findings can assist clinicians in formulating exercise prescriptions more effectively. Further, it can offer researchers valuable insights into the study of children with cerebral palsy to explore additional aspects such as duration of exercise, safety, motion parameters, and balance function.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplemental Digital Content. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are publicly available.

Abbreviations

CP:

Cerebral palsy

RCTs:

Randomized controlled trials

GMFCS:

Gross motor function classification system

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

SMD:

Standard mean differences

SD:

Standard deviation

GMFM:

Gross motor function measure

A/P:

Anteroposterior

L/M:

Mediolateral

References

  1. Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109:8–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arvedson JC. Feeding children with cerebral palsy and swallowing difficulties. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(Suppl 2):S9–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sewell MD, Eastwood DM, Wimalasundera N. Managing common symptoms of cerebral palsy in children. BMJ. 2014;349:g5474. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwabe AL. Comprehensive Care in Cerebral Palsy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2020;31(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2019.09.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bratteby Tollerz LU, Forslund AH, Olsson RM, Lidström H, Holmbäck U. Children with cerebral palsy do not achieve healthy physical activity levels. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(11):1125–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bugler KE, Gaston MS, Robb JE. Distribution and motor ability of children with cerebral palsy in Scotland: a registry analysis. Scott Med J. 2019;64(1):16–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0036933018805897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenbaum P. Family and quality of life: key elements in intervention in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(Suppl 4):68–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04068.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alghamdi MS, Chiarello LA, Palisano RJ, McCoy SW. Understanding participation of children with cerebral palsy in family and recreational activities. Res Dev Disabil. 2017;69:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paleg G, Livingstone R. Evidence-informed clinical perspectives on postural management for hip health in children and adults with non-ambulant cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2022;15(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-220002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(4):214–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zapata KA, Rushing CL, Delgado MR, Jo C. The observational gait scale can help determine the GMFCS Level in Children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2022;34(1):23–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackman M, Sakzewski L, Morgan C, et al. Interventions to improve physical function for children and young people with cerebral palsy: international clinical practice guideline. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(5):536–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho C, Hwang W, Hwang S, Chung Y. Treadmill training with virtual reality improves Gait, Balance, and muscle strength in children with cerebral palsy. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2016;238(3):213–8. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.238.213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vitrikas K, Dalton H, Breish D. Cerebral palsy: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101(4):213–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pourazar M, Firoozjah MH, Ardakani MD. Improving dynamic balance by self-controlled feedback in children with cerebral palsy. Hum Mov Sci. 2023;90:103123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2023.103123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fasano A, Bloem BR. Gait disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2013;1344–82. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.CON.0000436159.33447.69. 19(5 Movement Disorders.

  17. Li Causi V, Manelli A, Marini VG, et al. Balance assessment after altering stimulation of the neurosensory system. Med Glas (Zenica). 2021;18(1):328–33. https://doi.org/10.17392/1324-21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vassar RL, Rose J. Motor systems and postural instability. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;125:237–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62619-6.00015-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgan C, Fetters L, Adde L, et al. Early Intervention for Children Aged 0 to 2 years with or at high risk of cerebral palsy: International Clinical Practice Guideline based on systematic reviews. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(8):846–58. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0878.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, et al. Early, Accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(9):897–907. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Verschuren O, Peterson MD, Balemans AC, Hurvitz EA. Exercise and physical activity recommendations for people with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(8):798–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Booth ATC, Buizer AI, Meyns P, Oude Lansink ILB, Steenbrink F, van der Krogt MM. The efficacy of functional gait training in children and young adults with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(9):866–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pool D, Valentine J, Taylor NF, Bear N, Elliott C. Locomotor and robotic assistive gait training for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021;63(3):328–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Montoro-Cárdenas D, Cortés-Pérez I, Zagalaz-Anula N, Osuna-Pérez MC, Obrero-Gaitán E, Lomas-Vega R. Nintendo Wii Balance Board therapy for postural control in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021;63(11):1262–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liang X, Tan Z, Yun G, et al. Effectiveness of exercise interventions for children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rehabil Med. 2021;53(4):jrm00176. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Merino-Andrés J, García de Mateos-López A, Damiano DL, Sánchez-Sierra A. Effect of muscle strength training in children and adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36(1):4–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155211040199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moreau NG, Bodkin AW, Bjornson K, Hobbs A, Soileau M, Lahasky K. Effectiveness of Rehabilitation interventions to improve Gait Speed in Children with cerebral palsy: systematic review and Meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2016;96(12):1938–54. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Soares EG, Gusmão CHV, Souto DO. Efficacy of aerobic exercise on the functioning and quality of life of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2023;65(10):1292–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Green S, Higgins JP. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane Book Series. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.; 2008. 10.1002./9780470712184.ch1.

  32. Abd El-Kafy EM, El-Basatiny HM. Effect of postural balance training on gait parameters in children with cerebral palsy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93(11):938–47. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Adaikina A, Derraik JGB, Taylor J, O’Grady GL, Hofman PL, Gusso S. Vibration therapy as an early intervention for children aged 2–4 years with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2023;43(5):564–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2023.2181723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Adıguzel H, Elbasan B. Effects of modified pilates on trunk, postural control, gait and balance in children with cerebral palsy: a single-blinded randomized controlled study. Acta Neurol Belg. 2022;122(4):903–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-021-01845-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ameer MA, Fayez ES, Elkholy HH. Improving spatiotemporal gait parameters in spastic diplegic children using treadmill gait training. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019;23(4):937–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chrysagis N, Skordilis EK, Stavrou N, Grammatopoulou E, Koutsouki D. The effect of treadmill training on gross motor function and walking speed in ambulatory adolescents with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(9):747–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182643eba.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Curtis DJ, Woollacott M, Bencke J, et al. The functional effect of segmental trunk and head control training in moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Neurorehabil. 2018;21(2):91–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2016.1265603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. El-Basatiny HM, Abdel-Aziem AA. Effect of backward walking training on postural balance in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(5):457–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514547654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. El-Shamy SM. Effect of whole-body vibration on muscle strength and balance in diplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93(2):114–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182a541a4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gatica-Rojas V, Méndez-Rebolledo G, Guzman-Muñoz E, et al. Does Nintendo Wii Balance Board improve standing balance? A randomized controlled trial in children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(4):535–44. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04447-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. González L, Argüelles J, González V, et al. Slackline Training in children with spastic cerebral palsy: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(22):8649. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228649.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Grecco LA, Tomita SM, Christovão TC, Pasini H, Sampaio LM, Oliveira CS. Effect of treadmill gait training on static and functional balance in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-35552012005000066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Grecco LA, Zanon N, Sampaio LM, Oliveira CS. A comparison of treadmill training and overground walking in ambulant children with cerebral palsy: randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(8):686–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215513476721.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hemachithra C, Meena N, Ramanathan R, Felix AJW. Immediate effect of horse riding simulator on adductor spasticity in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Physiother Res Int. 2020;25(1):e1809. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jelsma J, Pronk M, Ferguson G, Jelsma-Smit D. The effect of the Nintendo Wii Fit on balance control and gross motor function of children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil. 2013;16(1):27–37. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2012.711781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kaya Kara O, Livanelioglu A, Yardımcı BN, Soylu AR. The effects of Functional Progressive Strength and Power Training in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2019;31(3):286–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kepenek-Varol B, Gürses HN, İçağasıoğlu DF. Effects of Inspiratory Muscle and balance training in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Dev Neurorehabil. 2022;25(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2021.1905727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Peungsuwan P, Parasin P, Siritaratiwat W, Prasertnu J, Yamauchi J. Effects of Combined Exercise training on functional performance in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized-controlled study. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2017;29(1):39–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Salem Y, Godwin EM. Effects of task-oriented training on mobility function in children with cerebral palsy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24(4):307–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2009-0483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Saxena S, Rao BK, Senthil KD. Short-term balance training with computer-based feedback in children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility and pilot randomized trial. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(3):115–20. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2015.1116635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Surana BK, Ferre CL, Dew AP, Brandao M, Gordon AM, Moreau NG. Effectiveness of Lower-Extremity Functional Training (LIFT) in Young Children with Unilateral Spastic cerebral palsy: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(10):862–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968319868719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tarakci D, Ersoz Huseyinsinoglu B, Tarakci E, Razak Ozdincler A. Effects of Nintendo Wii-Fit® video games on balance in children with mild cerebral palsy. Pediatr Int. 2016;58(10):1042–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.12942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wallard L, Dietrich G, Kerlirzin Y, Bredin J. Robotic-assisted gait training improves walking abilities in diplegic children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017;21(3):557–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.01.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wallard L, Dietrich G, Kerlirzin Y, Bredin J. Effect of robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation on dynamic equilibrium control in the gait of children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2018;60:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yazıcı M, Livanelioğlu A, Gücüyener K, Tekin L, Sümer E, Yakut Y. Effects of robotic rehabilitation on walking and balance in pediatric patients with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2019;70:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.03.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Saquetto M, Carvalho V, Silva C, Conceição C, Gomes-Neto M. The effects of whole body vibration on mobility and balance in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2015;15(2):137–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Damiano DL, Abel MF. Relation of gait analysis to gross motor function in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996;38(5):389–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15097.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu W, Hu Y, Li J, Chang J. Effect of virtual reality on balance function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2022;10:865474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.865474.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Smith LR, Lee KS, Ward SR, Chambers HG, Lieber RL. Hamstring contractures in children with spastic cerebral palsy result from a stiffer extracellular matrix and increased in vivo sarcomere length. J Physiol. 2011;589(Pt 10):2625–39. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2010.203364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhao H, Wu YN, Hwang M, et al. Changes of calf muscle-tendon biomechanical properties induced by passive-stretching and active-movement training in children with cerebral palsy. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011;111(2):435–42. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01361.2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kruse A, Schranz C, Svehlik M, Tilp M. The Effect of Functional Home-based Strength Training Programs on the Mechano-Morphological properties of the Plantar Flexor muscle-tendon unit in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2019;31(1):67–76. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2018-0106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Seynnes OR, de Boer M, Narici MV. Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response to high-intensity resistance training. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007;102(1):368–73. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00789.2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Okemuo AJ, Gallagher D, Dairo YM. Effects of rebound exercises on balance and mobility of people with neurological disorders: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(10):e0292312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Tiedemann A, Sherrington C, Close JC, Lord SR, Exercise, Sports Science Australia. Exercise and sports Science Australia position statement on exercise and falls prevention in older people. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(6):489–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Galloza J, Castillo B, Micheo W. Benefits of Exercise in the older Population. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017;28(4):659–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2017.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China

    Junjian Xiao

  2. Institute of Physical Education, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China

    Linghong Liu

  3. Sports Department, Sanjiang University, Nanjing, China

    Nan Tang

  4. School of Sports Science, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China

    Chao Yi

Authors
  1. Junjian Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linghong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nan Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chao Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JJX was responsible for designing the study and formulating the search strategy. JJX and NT conducted abstract and full-text screening, evaluated the methodological quality, performed risk of bias assessment, and contributed to the completion of screening and data extraction for all the data in this manuscript. JJX and LHL conducted meta-analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias assessments. JJX authored the initial version and summaried the tables. JJX, LHL, NT and CY collaborated in editing and amending the manuscript to produce its final edition. All authors have thoroughly reviewed and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Yi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval and consent to participate were not required because this study is a meta-analysis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No conflicts and interests relevant to the content of this review.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, J., Liu, L., Tang, N. et al. Effects of exercise intervention on balance function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 16, 164 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00922-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00922-5

Keywords

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation

ISSN: 2052-1847

Contact us