Skip to main content
Download PDF

Orosomucoid: a promising biomarker for the assessment of exercise-induced fatigue triggered by basic combat training

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation volume 14, Article number: 100 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Orosomucoid (ORM) is a positive acute phase protein verified to be upregulated in various forms of exercise-induced fatigued (EIF) rodents. However, its association with EIF among human beings remained unknown. This study aimed to explore the association between serum ORM and EIF triggered by military basic combat training (BCT).

Methods

The degree of EIF were measured by Borg’s Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (Borg-RPE-Scale®) as RPE score after BCT. Fifty-three male recruits were classified into three groups according to the RPE score: (1) group 1 (slight fatigue group): RPE score after BCT < 13; (2) group 2 (moderate fatigue group): RPE score after BCT = 13 or 14; (3) group 3 (severe fatigue group): RPE score after BCT > 14. The levels of blood ORM, lactate (LAC), cortisol and C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined before and after BCT. The diagnostic value of ORM was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and logistic regression.

Results

After BCT, the level of LAC, CRP, and cortisol increased among all groups, but the changes had no significant between-group difference (all p > 0.05). The level of ORM had a specific significant increase in group 3 (p = 0.039), and the changes of ORM (ΔORM) had significant difference among groups (p = 0.033). ROC curve analysis showed that the estimated area under ROC curve for ΔORM was 0.724 (p = 0.009) with the recommended optimal cut-off value as 0.2565 mg/mL. Logistic analysis showed that recruits with ΔORM ≥ 0.2565 mg/mL had higher odds for suffering from severe EIF, 5.625 times (95% CI 1.542–20.523, p = 0.009) as large as those with ΔORM < 0.2565 mg/mL.

Conclusion

ORM might be a promising biomarker of severe EIF triggered by BCT among male recruits. Its potential optimal cut-off value regarding ΔORM was recommended to be 0.2565 mg/mL.

Peer Review reports

Background

Exercise-induced fatigue (EIF) refers to a state in which the physiological function of the body cannot be kept at a certain level or the organism cannot maintain a predetermined exercise intensity [1].

The precise pathophysiological mechanism of EIF remains unclear now. Some evidences show that the occurrence of EIF correlates with both physical (e.g., training intensity and volume) and social-psychological factors (e.g., feeling of loneliness, resistance psychology to exercise) [2,3,4,5], which may include central and peripheral nerve-muscle functional activities [6], cardiovascular and respiratory system functions [7], energy and substance metabolism [8], internal environment disorders [9], and collapse of fatigue control chain [10]. The uncertainty of the mechanism results in the uncertainty of objective evaluation of EIF. At present, the confirmed and widely-acknowledged tool of EIF assessment is the Borg’s Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale, a widely used psycho-physical tool to semi-quantitatively assess subjective perception of EIF [11], but objective specific indicator for the evaluation of EIF is still absent.

In China, basic combat training (BCT), formed from high-intensity military training, is a stage helping a recruit become a qualified soldier [12]. Fatigue among military personnel can be triggered by various factors, among which, BCT is the potential primary one [13]. As reported by a meta-analysis of 52,597 recruits, during BCT period, EIF is one of the main causes of military training injury [14]. Therefore, assessment and management of EIF has strategic significance for maintaining combat capability [15], which starves for some specific and objective indicators or biomarkers for the objective assessment of EIF.

Orosomucoid (ORM) is a positive acute phase protein (molecular weight: 37–54 kDa) verified to modulate inflammation, immunity, mediate the energy metabolism, and maintain the function of capillary [16]. A previous study verified that in rodents suffering from exercise-induced fatigue, the level of ORM was upregulated significantly in blood, muscle and liver [17]. Also, it is verified that ORM is a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome [18]. These results suggested that ORM may be a potential biomarker for the assessment of EIF triggered by BCT.

According to the previous studies, blood lactic acid (LAC) and cortisol are two typical traditional biomarkers of fatigue. LAC is the anaerobic breakdown metabolite of carbohydrate. During exercise and physical training, as the oxygen and energy exhaust, the metabolite LAC accumulates [19]. The “LAC hypothesis” for muscle fatigue, a kind of EIF, states that “accumulation of lactate or acidosis in working muscle causes inhibition of contractile processes, either directly or via metabolism, resulting in diminished exercise performance” [20]. At present, LAC, as an indicator of energy metabolism, has been regarded as a biomarker of EIF in some intensive exercises such as swimming [21, 22] and cycling [23, 24]. Cortisol is a kind of hormones maintaining the body homeostasis produced during acute or chronic physical exercise [25]. Study of Dely et al. [26] reported that the level of cortisol doubled immediately when participants exercised at 100% of their ventilatory threshold on a treadmill until volitional fatigue. Kageta et al. [27] also observed similar exercise-induced response of cortisol during a three-week chronic exercise training. Furthermore, cortisol has been reported to regulate the expression of ORM gene in liver cells [28].

CRP, an analogues of ORM, is also an acute-phase protein. Increased levels of CRP have been observed in fatigue of patients suffering from chronic hemodialysis [29] and rheumatoid arthritis [30]. Some studies reported that regular exercise appeared to decrease CRP level [31,32,33], while contrary conclusion was also reported by studies of physical activity [34, 35].

In this study, we aimed to explore the association between serum ORM and EIF triggered by BCT among male recruits undergoing Chinese BCT, so as to clarify the efficiency of ORM in the assessment of EIF. Besides, we also determined the levels of LAC, cortisol and CRP to verify whether ORM is the more useful biomarker than the classical parameters for the diagnosis of EIF triggered by BCT.

Methods

Participants and BCT

From the end of September to December in 2018, we followed 53 male recruits undergoing BCT at a navy basic training base in China. This navy BCT is a 12-week high-intensity military training course covering basic physical training and navy tactical training, according the requirements of the Chinese Naval Military Training Program [36]. The basic physical training covers various military endurance trainings, strength trainings, and speed trainings. The navy tactical training includes normal tactical skills and actions. The BCT was uninterrupted during 12 weeks. Daily training items were scheduled by this training base, which usually comprised several types of physical training and navy tactical training.

The inclusion criteria of participants were: (1) qualified recruits in this navy basic training base in 2018; (2) aged 18 to 25; (3) no major organic diseases or limb joint damage that may prevent participation in daily military training tasks; (4) willing to participate in this study and promising the authenticity of the subjective survey questions; and (5) signing the informed consent. The exclusion criteria of participants were: (1) having taken one or more drugs that may cause fatigue within the 2 weeks prior to BCT and (2) suffering from diseases that may cause fatigue, such as kind of acute or chronic infectious diseases (e.g., colds), fibromyalgia, depression, tristimania, etc., within the 2 weeks prior to BCT.

All the recruits were managed with unified training, life schedule, and diet supplies by the training base. According to the average diet supplies, no caffeine was involved in all the diet of recruits.

This study was approved by the Shanghai Changhai Hospital Ethnics Committee (No: 2018-048), and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Measurement of EIF and group classification

According to the definition of EIF [1] and the current methods of EIF assessment, the degree of EIF was primarily evaluated by subjective perception scale, while physical exercise capacity was also determined to further clarify the rationale of subjective perception.

Subjective perception of EIF were measured by Borg’s Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (Borg-RPE-Scale®) as RPE score before (one day before the beginning of BCT) and after BCT (immediately when participants finished the last item of BCT physical assessment). The BCT physical assessment was performed at the last day of this 12-week BCT, which includes three typical physical training items and one typical navy tactical training item. The grade of BCT physical assessment would influence a recruit’s occupation allocation. Therefore, recruits always make their every effort to get a better grade, which often results into fatigue.

The Borg-RPE-Scale®, widely suggested as a valid method for monitoring EIF, has 15 rates in total, from 6 (no exertion at all) to 20 (maximal exertion), with a higher rate score indicating a higher degree of perceived fatigue [37]. It is reported that the RPE score is closely related to exercise load intensity, heart rate, oxygen consumption, lactic acid, and hormones [38]. Generally, RPE < 9 indicted the feeling of very light exertion like a healthy person taking a short walk, RPE = 13 indicated the physical activity is somewhat hard for a person but to continue is no problem, and when RPE increases to 15, the person feels tiring and has difficulty to continue the activity (Fig. 1A) (Borg G. Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pan Scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1998). According to the above classification of Borg-RPE-Scale® score, participants were classified into three groups according to the RPE score measured after BCT as follows: (1) group 1 (slight fatigue group): RPE score after BCT < 13; (2) group 2 (moderate fatigue group): RPE score after BCT = 13 or 14; (3) group 3 (severe fatigue group): RPE score after BCT > 14 (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Borg-RPE-Scale® (A) and classification of groups (B)

Full size image

Physical exercise capacity was measured by TZCS-3 Vertical Jump Height Monitor (KeDao Electronic Co. Ltd, Ningbo, China) as vertical jump height (VJH) before (one day before the beginning of BCT) and after BCT (immediately when participants finished the last test item of BCT physical assessment). VJH is a simple test to evaluate exercise capacity without extra strenuous exercise and has been indexed in the Handbook of National Physical Fitness Determination Standards in China [39]. Some studies have addressed that by indicating the capacity of lower limb neuromuscular state, VJH could also reflect the degree of EIF [40, 41]. Although there are also various other tests for the determination of exercise capacity, generally to finish those tests, an extra strenuous exercise is inevitable. Hence, in this study, to avoid the impact of Physical exercise capacity measurement on the degree of EIF, we chose VJH as the index.

Measurement of blood ORM, LAC, cortisol and CRP

On considering the potential properties of EIF assessment or their association with ORM, we included LAC, cortisol, and CRP as indicants for comparison. The blood samples of participants were collected before (the morning before the beginning of BCT, week 0) and after BCT (immediately when participants finished the last test item of BCT physical assessment, week 12) from the cubital vein. The blood samples were collected in inert separation gel vacuum collective tubes (BD Vacutainer SST II Advance Tubes, 5 mL, #367,955, BD, UK) and immediately served in 0 ℃ circumstance. Within 20 min after blood drawing, all the collected blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min to retrieve the serum. Serum levels of ORM were determined via Human ORM ELISA kit obtained from Abcam PLC., USA (ab108854; sensitivity: 0.1 μg/mL; intra-assay CV%: 5.3%; inter-assay CV%: 10.0%; measuring range: 12.5–100.0 ng/mL) according to the manufacture’s instruction under the dilution ratio 1:10,000. Serum levels of LAC, cortisol, and CRP were determined via Human LAC ELISA kit (H263-1–2; sensitivity: 0.1 ng/mL; intra-assay CV%: < 12%; inter-assay CV%: < 10.0%; measuring range: 40–10,000 ng/mL), Human Cortisol ELISA kit (H094; sensitivity: 0.1 ng/mL; intra-assay CV%: < 12%; inter-assay CV%: < 10.0%; measuring range: 5–2000 ng/mL), Human CRP ELISA kit (H126; sensitivity: 0.01 mg/L; intra-assay CV%: < 12%; inter-assay CV%: < 10.0%; measuring range: 0.5–150 mg/L) obtained from Shanghai Branch of Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Shanghai, China) according to the manufacture’s instruction without dilution.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Within-group comparisons were performed using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test, and between-group differences were compared using one-way analysis of variance or Kruskal–Wallis H test for normality and non-normality data, respectively. The relationship between serum ORM and cortisol, lactate and CRP, and BCT RPE scores and VJH were analyzed by Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis according to the normality. The diagnostic value of ORM was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve as the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity. The optimal cut-off values were obtained via Youden index approach [42]. Further, logistic regression was conducted to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of ORM cut-off value in predicting EIF. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of participants

Demographic characteristics and BCT RPE score are summarized in Table 1. According to the RPE score after BCT, a total of 12, 24 and 17 participants were classified into slight, moderate, and severe fatigue group (groups 1–3), respectively. The degree of EIF measured by RPE after BCT had significant difference among groups (post-BCT RPE score for groups 1–3: 11.33 ± 0.78, 13.33 ± 0.48, 16.00 ± 1.54, respectively, ranged from 10 to 20; p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed among groups in terms of demographic characteristics, age, height, weight, and body mass index (all p > 0.05).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics and BCT RPE score among groups (N = 53)
Full size table

Change of exercise capacity (VJH) among groups

As shown in Fig. 2, before BCT, the VJH among the three groups were comparable (between-group p = 0.702). After 12-week BCT, the VJH of group 1 showed a decreasing trend from 24.58 ± 2.64 cm to 23.21 ± 1.92 cm (within-group p = 0.184), and that of group 2 and group 3 decreased significantly (both within-group p < 0.001), verifying the existence of EIF among groups: for group 1, the EIF did be very light as only slight perception of exertion existed without substantial decline of exercise capacity; but for groups 2 and 3, the degree of EIF increased as the average RPE score be higher with substantial decline of exercise capacity. The correlation analysis showed no correlation relationship between BCT RPE scores and VJH before and after BCT, and between changed BCT RPE scores and changed VJH during BCT (Additional file 1: Table S1), further implying the alternation of VJH and BCT RPE during the process of EIF may be not in a linear fashion.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Vertical jump height among groups. Data are present as mean ± standard error of mean. #Between-group p value, calculated by Kruskal–Wallis H test. ***Within-group p value < 0.001, compared with baseline (before BCT), calculated by Wilcoxon test. BCT, basic combat training

Full size image

Level of blood ORM, LAC, CRP, and cortisol among groups

The levels of ORM, LAC, CRP, and cortisol are present in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Level of ORM, LAC, CRP, and cortisol among groups. Data were shown as mean ± standard error of mean. Changes were calculated as the level after BCT minus that before BCT. # Between-group P value, calculated by Kruskal–Wallis H test. * Within-group p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, levels of parameters after BCT compared with those before BCT, calculated by Wilcoxon test. BCT, basic combat training; CRP, C-reactive protein; LAC, lactate; ORM, orosomucoid

Full size image

Before BCT, the baseline level of ORM, LAC, CRP, and cortisol were comparable among groups (Fig. 3, all p > 0.05). After BCT, ORM had a significant increase in group 3 (0.22 ± 0.37 mg/mL, p = 0.039), and declined without significance in groups 1 and 2. The changes of ORM levels were significant among groups (Fig. 3, p = 0.033, individual data are shown in Fig. 4), indicating that serum ORM would specifically increase among population with severe EIF triggered by BCT.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The change of orosomucoid (ΔORM) of each recruit in three groups. Pi (i = 1,2,3….24): the serial number of participants in specific group. ΔORM was calculated as the level after basic combat training minus that before basic combat training. The unit of ΔORM is mg/mL

Full size image

The level of LAC, CRP, and cortisol almost increased among all groups after BCT, with all within-group p < 0.05 except the increase of CRP in group 3 and cortisol in group 1. However, the changes of these 3 indicators had no significant between-group difference (Fig. 3, p = 0.543, 0.757 and 0.745, respectively), implying that although BCT could increase their levels, the 3 indicators cannot distinguish the different degrees of EIF triggered by BCT.

The correlation analysis showed that the levels of serum ORM, LAC, CRP, and cortisol had some correlation relationships, but the correlation relationships varied among the before and after BCT (Additional file 1: Table S1), further illustrating the different alternation mode of these four parameters in indicating the degree of EIF.

The potential diagnostic value of serum ORM in EIF

Since we found that after BCT, the changed level of ORM (ΔORM, calculated as the level after BCT minus that before BCT) was specifically increased significantly in severe EIF population (group 3, Fig. 3) but not in slight and moderate EIF population (groups 1 and 2), we further analyzed ROC curve analysis to evaluate its potential diagnostic value in severe EIF after BCT (post-BCT RPE score > 14).

The estimated AUC for ΔORM was 0.724 (95% CI 0.581–0.867, p = 0.009, Fig. 5A). As the maximal Youden index suggested, the recommended optimal cut-off value of ΔORM was 0.2565 mg/mL with sensitivity and specificity as 0.529 and 0.833 (Fig. 5B), and accuracy as 71.1% (38/53, Table 2).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Diagnostic ability and cut-off value of ΔORM. A Receiver operating curve of ΔORM. B Sensitivity (Se.), specificity (Sp.) and Youden index (YI) at various cut-off points of ORM. AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; ΔORM, changed level of orosomucoid during basic combat training (BCT), calculated as the level after BCT minus that before BCT; YI max, the value of y-axis equals the maximal value of Youden index

Full size image
Table 2 OR for severe EIF among recruits with ΔORM ≥ cut-off
Full size table

Further, logistic analysis of this dataset showed that after BCT, for recruits with ΔORM ≥ 0.2565 mg/mL, the odds for suffering from severe EIF were 5.625 times as large than the odds for those with ΔORM < 0.2565 mg/mL (95% CI 1.542–20.523, p = 0.009, Table 2).

In contrast, in order to verify ORM is more useful than LAC, CRP, and cortisol in diagnosing severe EIF population, we also calculated estimated AUC for changed level of LAC, CRP and cortisol. As shown in Table 3, the estimated AUCs for these three biomarkers failed to have significant diagnostic ability (p value of AUC > 0.05 for all).

Table 3 Estimated AUC area for ΔORM, ΔLAC, ΔCRP and Δcortisol
Full size table

All these analyses of potential diagnostic indicated that ΔORM may be an effective biomarker for the severe EIF triggered by BCT.

Discussion

Fatigue is one of our body’s normal physical reactions to training. The degree of fatigue is actually a state which covers the interaction of both physical fatigue manifesting as the descending physiological function of the body to maintain a predetermined exercise intensity [1] and psychological fatigue manifesting as the subjective perception such as feeling tired and exhausted [43]. Although the Borg’s Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale innovatively established a correlation between physical and psychological state of EIF, making the degree of EIF measurable, it is still a kind of subjective evaluation in essence. Therefore, researchers have exerted efforts on exploring objective biomarkers for some specific population like athletes of swimming [44], marathon [45], soccer [46], etc. Military training, including basic combat training, is a central section to enhance combat effectiveness. Since EIF is inevitable during the process, precise diagnosis of EIF has important significance in adjusting training schedule, promoting training adaption, and preventing military-training injury.

Before our study, no confirmed biomarker was available for assessing EIF triggered by BCT. In our study, we observed the level of ORM together with LAC, cortisol and CRP, the potential indicators of EIF suggested by previous studies, during a 12-week basic combat training.

Our study illustrated that the level of LAC, cortisol and CRP increased among all groups after BCT, however, no significant difference was observed among groups, implying that although the three parameters may indicate the presence of training load, they could not distinguish EIF at different degree, thus cannot be biomarkers of EIF triggered by BCT. Previous studies also observed LAC, cortisol and CRP increased after exercise, which is consistent with our experimental results. Some studies regarded LAC as a “fatigue agent” and “signal molecule” in muscle fatigue [47], since acidosis strongly contributes to fatigue and lower work capacity has strong connection with lower pH [20]. However, other factors such as depleted glycogen levels [47] or a high carbohydrate diet [48] prior exercise can also influence blood LAC concentration. During BCT, though nutritive diet was supplied uniformly for each recruit, we did not explore the quantity of glycogen and carbohydrate, which may explain why LAC lacks the capacity to be detected as a biomarker. The increase of cortisol after BCT may be resulted from the stress response of exercise, which promoted the release of cortisol through feedback regulation [48]. But according to our results, recruits may have similar stress response to BCT, which had no correlation with the degree of EIF. Increase of serum CRP was also observed among civil servant with occupational burnout in British [49], and cycling athletes [50]. In this study, CRP was included as an analogue of ORM. Its failure in distinguishing EIF may underline the individualization and specificity of various acute-phase proteins, and the potential difference of physical mechanism in different exercises.

Although the LAC, cortisol and CRP failed to be a biomarker of EIF triggered by BCT, we discovered that the level of serum ORM specifically increased significantly among participants with severe EIF (post-BCT RPE score > 14), indicating ΔORM (changed level of ORM during BCT, calculated as the level after BCT minus that before BCT) to be a promising biomarker of severe EIF. Further analysis of ΔORM on its diagnostic value demonstrated that it had good discriminatory potential to diagnose severe EIF with estimated AUC as 0.724 (generally an AUC of 0.5 suggests no discrimination, 0.7 to 0.8 is considered good, 0.8 to 0.9 excellent and > 0.9 outstanding [51, 52]). The optimal cut-off value of ΔORM is 0.2565 mg/mL as recommended by the maximal Youden index. Although the value seems small, the logistic analysis based on this dataset showed that after BCT, recruits with ΔORM ≥ 0.2565 mg/mL had higher odds for suffering from severe EIF, as 5.625 times as large than those with ΔORM < 0.2565 mg/mL, which also revealed its potency as a promising biomarker. Previous studies reported that ORM could interact with skeletal muscle and inhibit protein breakdown [53], and increase muscle bioenergetics and sustain physiological endurance via upregulating the ATP production through AMPK signalling pathway [17, 54]. When recruits felt exhausted (severe EIF during BCT), the energy supply was likely to be under compensation stage, therefore may triggered the increase of ORM. Oppositely, when the recruits could continue exercise easily, the compensation stage of energy may not be motivated, which could explain why ΔORM could indicate severe EIF (RPE score > 14) while not slight and moderate EIF (RPE score ≤ 14). But, anyway, the exact mechanism is needed to be verified by studies in the future.

This study initially explored the association of ORM and EIF triggered by BCT among male recruits undergoing Chinese BCT, revealed ΔORM to be a promising biomarker of severe EIF, and preliminarily estimated its optimal cut-off value as 0.2565 mg/mL, therefore, it can serve as a reference for EIF assessment during BCT.

Our study also has some limitations. Firstly, this study is only an observational study of 53 recruits. All participants were selected by their willingness without randomization. No specific sample size calculation was performed. Therefore, the diagnostic value of ΔORM should be verified and tested by larger diagnostic studies. Secondly, the exercise was confined to BCT, whether ΔORM could indicate EIF triggered by other types of exercise remains unknown. Thirdly, we only investigated male recruits in this study, therefore, our conclusions may not be applicable to female recruits. Fourthly, since the researchers were forbidden to collect blood sample more than twice, the timeline of ORM increase during BCT was not explored. In addition, exercise-induced fatigue may involve many such as physical, psychological, cognitive, and motor appropriate etc., biomarker or ORM may only be a part of them. More studies about holistic integrate function of human, and to establish a comprehensive evaluation framework of EIF may add to the accuracy of diagnosis.

Conclusion

In summary, we found that ORM increased specifically among recruits with severe EIF after BCT, revealed the diagnostic value of ΔORM in discriminating severe EIF from slight and moderate EIF, and estimated its potential optimal cut-off value as 0.2565 mg/mL. Thus, ORM might be a novel and promising biomarker for the assessment of EIF triggered by BCT. Whether the diagnostic performance of serum ORM together with classical parameters of EIF will be better than serum ORM alone is valuable to be explored in the future.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BCT:

Basic combat training

CRP:

C-reactive protein

EIF:

Exercise-induced fatigued

LAC:

Lactate

ORM:

Orosomucoid

ΔORM:

Changes of orosomucoid

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

RPE:

The degree of exercise-induced fatigue measured by Borg’s Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (Borg-RPE-Scale®), i.e., RPE score

References

  1. Hou L, Su X, Bian Y, Ji W, Zhang Y, Liu X, et al. Evaluation of exercise-induced fatigue model in rats with HR using treadmill exercise with progressively increasing load. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(16 Supplement):C64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. John E. Dead tired. There’s no question sleep deprivation and fatigue can harm performance. How bad is it in EMS, and what can we do about it? EMS World. 2011;40(3):41–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn S, Nguyen T, Jang H, Kim JG, Jun SC. Exploring neuro-physiological correlates of drivers’ mental fatigue caused by sleep deprivation using simultaneous EEG, ECG, and fNIRS data. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:219.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith CA, Miner AS, Barbee RW, Ratz PH. Metabolic stress-induced activation of AMPK and inhibition of constitutive phosphoproteins controlling smooth muscle contraction: evidence for smooth muscle fatigue? Front Physiol. 2017;8:681.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Haynes A. Reduction of sleep deprivation and fatigue in mass transit rail operators. Workplace Health Saf. 2017;65(8):333–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gandevia SC. Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(4):1725–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wan JJ, Qin Z, Wang PY, Sun Y, Liu X. Muscle fatigue: general understanding and treatment. Exp Mol Med. 2017;49(10): e384.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kent-Braun JA, Fitts RH, Christie A. Skeletal muscle fatigue. Compr Physiol. 2012;2(2):997–1044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang HJ, Kwak YS, Yoon GA, Kang MH, Park JH, Lee BK, et al. Combined effects of swim training and ginseng supplementation on exercise performance time, ROS, lymphocyte proliferation, and DNA damage following exhaustive exercise stress. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2007;77(4):289–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Focus E. Practical exercise physiology. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House Co., LTD; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feng L, Feng M, Feng W. Evaluation of physical function of elite athletes. Beijing: People’s Sports Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao CH, Xiao LN, Deng SX, Zhang JH, Li HC, Huang W, et al. Study on the occurrence of fatigue due to military operation among the recruits during training period. Med J Chin PLA. 2012;27(1):11–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tong CL. Causes and preventive measures for military training injury in recruits. World Latest Med Inf (Electronic Version). 2019;19(20):34–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tan AC, Liu X, He Q, Chen TM, Wang QQ, Zhu SL, et al. Meta-analysis of incidence rate of military training injuries among recruits during the basic combat training in China. Injury Med. 2012;1:33–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lu Y, Lin C, Huang J, Yan H, Weng F. Management on psychoreaction of military personnel to modern war: a literature review. J Prev Med Chin PLA. 2004;22(6):455–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luo Z, Lei H, Sun Y, Liu X, Su DF. Orosomucoid, an acute response protein with multiple modulating activities. J Physiol Biochem. 2015;71(2):329–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lei H, Sun Y, Luo Z, Yourek G, Gui H, Yang Y, et al. Fatigue-induced orosomucoid 1 acts on C-C chemokine receptor type 5 to enhance muscle endurance. Sci Rep. 2016;6:18839.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun Y, Zhang ZX, Liu X. Orosomucoid (ORM) as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). CNS Neurosci Ther. 2016;22(3):251–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Richardson RS, Wary C, Wray DW, Hoff J, Rossiter HB, Layec G, et al. MRS evidence of adequate O2 supply in human skeletal muscle at the onset of exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(11):2299–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cairns SP. Lactic acid and exercise performance : Culprit or friend? Sports Med. 2006;36(4):279–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nikolaidis S, Karpouzi C, Tsalis G, Kabasakalis A, Papaioannou K, Mougios V. Reliability of urine lactate as a novel biomarker of lactate production capacity in maximal swimming. Biomarkers. 2016;21(4):328–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mota MR, Dantas RAE, Oliveira-Silva I, Sales MM, Sotero RDC, Venancio PEM, et al. Effect of self-paced active recovery and passive recovery on blood lactate removal following a 200 m freestyle swimming trial. J Sports Sci. 2017;8:155–60.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Faude O, Hecksteden A, Hammes D, Schumacher F, Besenius E, Sperlich B, et al. Reliability of time-to-exhaustion and selected psycho-physiological variables during constant-load cycling at the maximal lactate steady-state. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017;42(2):142–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boning D, Klarholz C, Himmelsbach B, Hutler M, Maassen N. Causes of differences in exercise-induced changes of base excess and blood lactate. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;99(2):163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wood RI, Stanton SJ. Testosterone and sport: current perspectives. Horm Behav. 2012;61(1):147–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Daly W, Seegers CA, Rubin DA, Dobridge JD, Hackney AC. Relationship between stress hormones and testosterone with prolonged endurance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;93(4):375–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kageta T, Tsuchiya Y, Morishima T, Hasegawa Y, Sasaki H, Goto K. Influences of increased training volume on exercise performance, physiological and psychological parameters. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016;56(7–8):913–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baumann H, Gauldie J. Regulation of hepatic acute phase plasma protein genes by hepatocyte stimulating factors and other mediators of inflammation. Mol Biol Med. 1990;7(2):147–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bossola M, Luciani G, Giungi S, Tazza L. Anorexia, fatigue, and plasma interleukin-6 levels in chronic hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2010;32(9):1049–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Choy E. Understanding the dynamics: pathways involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(Suppl 5):v3-11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldhammer E, Tanchilevitch A, Maor I, Beniamini Y, Rosenschein U, Sagiv M. Exercise training modulates cytokines activity in coronary heart disease patients. Int J Cardiol. 2005;100(1):93–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Toft AD, Jensen LB, Bruunsgaard H, Ibfelt T, Halkjaer-Kristensen J, Febbraio M, et al. Cytokine response to eccentric exercise in young and elderly humans. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;283(1):C289–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Okita K, Nishijima H, Murakami T, Nagai T, Morita N, Yonezawa K, et al. Can exercise training with weight loss lower serum C-reactive protein levels? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(10):1868–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pischon T, Hankinson SE, Hotamisligil GS, Rifai N, Rimm EB. Leisure-time physical activity and reduced plasma levels of obesity-related inflammatory markers. Obes Res. 2003;11(9):1055–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aronson D, Sheikh-Ahmad M, Avizohar O, Kerner A, Sella R, Bartha P, et al. C-Reactive protein is inversely related to physical fitness in middle-aged subjects. Atherosclerosis. 2004;176(1):173–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. The Central Military Commission of China. Regulations of China's people's liberation army on the military training. April 6, 1990.

  37. Soriano-Maldonado A, Romero L, Femia P, Roero C, Ruiz JR, Gutierrez A. A learning protocol improves the validity of the Borg 6–20 RPE scale during indoor cycling. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35(5):379–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Aamot IL, Forbord SH, Karlsen T, Stoylen A. Does rating of perceived exertion result in target exercise intensity during interval training in cardiac rehabilitation? A study of the Borg scale versus a heart rate monitor. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17(5):541–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. China GAoSo. Handbook of National Physical Fitness Determination Standards. Beijing: People's Sports Press; 2003.

  40. Hogarth LW, Burkett BJ, McKean MR. Neuromuscular and perceptual fatigue responses to consecutive tag football matches. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(5):559–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Montgomery PG, Pyne DB, Hopkins WG, Dorman JC, Cook K, Minahan CL. The effect of recovery strategies on physical performance and cumulative fatigue in competitive basketball. J Sports Sci. 2008;26(11):1135–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Crouser ED, Parrillo JE, Seymour C, Angus DC, Bicking K, Tejidor L, et al. Improved early detection of sepsis in the ED with a novel monocyte distribution width biomarker. Chest. 2017;152(3):518–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Vrijkotte S, Meeusen R, Vandervaeren C, Buyse L, Cutsem JV, Pattyn N, et al. Mental fatigue and physical and cognitive performance during a 2-bout exercise test. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(4):510–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Matthews MJ, Green D, Matthews H, Swanwick E. The effects of swimming fatigue on shoulder strength, range of motion, joint control, and performance in swimmers. Phys Ther Sport. 2017;23:118–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bouic PJ, Clark A, Lamprecht J, Freestone M, Pool EJ, Liebenberg RW, et al. The effects of B-sitosterol (BSS) and B-sitosterol glucoside (BSSG) mixture on selected immune parameters of marathon runners: inhibition of post marathon immune suppression and inflammation. Int J Sports Med. 1999;20(4):258–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Djaoui L, Haddad M, Chamari K, Dellal A. Monitoring training load and fatigue in soccer players with physiological markers. Physiol Behav. 2017;181:86–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Theofilidis G, Bogdanis GC, Koutedakis Y, Karatzaferi C. Monitoring exercise-induced muscle fatigue and adaptations: making sense of popular or emerging indices and biomarkers. Sports (Basel). 2018;6(4):153.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Maughan RJ, Greenhaff PL, Leiper JB, Ball D, Lambert CP, Gleeson M. Diet composition and the performance of high-intensity exercise. J Sports Sci. 1997;15(3):265–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cho HJ, Kivimaki M, Bower JE, Irwin MR. Association of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 with new-onset fatigue in the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. Psychol Med. 2013;43(8):1773–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nakajima T, Kurano M, Hasegawa T, Takano H, Iida H, Yasuda T, et al. Pentraxin3 and high-sensitive C-reactive protein are independent inflammatory markers released during high-intensity exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;110(5):905–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(9):1315–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Draelos R. Measuring Performance: AUC (AUROC) 2019 [updated 2019–02–23. Available from: https://glassboxmedicine.com/2019/02/23/measuring-performance-auc-auroc/.

  53. Ramsay TG, Blomberg LA, Elsasser TH, Caperna TJ. α-1 acid glycoprotein inhibits insulin responses by glucose oxidation, protein synthesis and protein breakdown in mouse C2C12 myotubes. Animal. 2019;13(4):771–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wan J, Qin Z, Lei H, Wang P, Zhang Y, Feng J, et al. Erythromycin has therapeutic efficacy on muscle fatigue acting specifically on orosomucoid to increase muscle bioenergetics and physiological parameters of endurance. Pharmacol Res. 2020;161: 105118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank all the recruits who participated in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No: 2018ZX09J18110-003-002 to WG), National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2018ZX09711002-003-015 to XL), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773726 to XL), and Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan Project (19401900100 to XL and 19431901400 to ZQ).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yi Ruan, Ke-fa Xiang and Hui-min Zhang contributed equally

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, 200433, China

    Yi Ruan, Ke-fa Xiang, Hui-min Zhang, Zhen Qin, Yang Sun, Jing-jing Wan & Xia Liu

  2. School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, 200433, China

    Yi Ruan & Wei Gu

Authors
  1. Yi Ruan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ke-fa Xiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hui-min Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhen Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yang Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jing-jing Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wei Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xia Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Professor XL and WG designed the hypotheses and the experiments. YR, K-fX and H-mZ were responsible for data collection and analysis. YR, K-fX and H-mZ, ZQ, YS and J-jW conducted the experiments. All authors participated in data interpretation and manuscript review and writing. All authors contributed to the scientific discussion of the data and of the manuscript. YR, K-fX, and H-mZ contributed equally to this study. Professor XL and WG are co-corresponding authors of this study: Professor XL is the first corresponding author of this study; Professor WG is the second corresponding author of this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Gu or Xia Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Shanghai Changhai Hospital Ethnics Committee (No: 2018-048), and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants signed the informed consent before participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The correlation between RPE, VJH, serum ORM, serum CRP, serum C, and serum LAC.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruan, Y., Xiang, Kf., Zhang, Hm. et al. Orosomucoid: a promising biomarker for the assessment of exercise-induced fatigue triggered by basic combat training. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 14, 100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00490-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00490-6

Keywords