Skip to main content

Physical activity during pregnancy: a systematic review for the assessment of current evidence with future recommendations



Physical activity is essential to maternal and infant health. Healthcare professionals should inform pregnant women about benefits of physical activity to prevent possible health issues. Those recommendations should elaborate on relevant contemporary evidence. The aim of this study was to review evidence-based recommendations for physical activity during pregnancy.


A systematic search, analysis and synthesis of conducted randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted from October 2021 to June 2022 in following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, ScienceDirect and Web of Science. Literature was searched using inclusion and exclusion criteria and following PRISMA recommendations.


Benefits for pregnant-women health and well-being were reported while performing aerobic exercise, lumbar stabilization and stretching exercise, water exercise, nerve and tendon-slip exercise, resistance training and strength training. For all exercise modalities it is recommended to perform moderate intensity activities during the whole time of pregnancy.


This systematic literature review supplements current knowledge on physical activity of pregnant women. Exercise interventions are listed and suggested in an integrative model with physical-fitness components to contextualize and promote physical activity among pregnant women.

Peer Review reports


Physical activity (PA) is defined as “bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure” [1]. PA is believed to be essential to healthy pregnancy. Historically, Biblical writers noticed that Hebrew slave women gave birth more easily than sedentary Egyptian mistresses [2]. Moreover, it is believed that PA during pregnancy limits gestational weight-gain [3,4,5], decreases risk of maternal mental disorders after childbirth [6, 7] and improves body image satisfaction [8]. PA in pregnancy is pivotal to facilitating positive health outcomes in infants [9].

To corroborate the role of PA in pregnancy and the expected favourable health outcomes for pregnant women and infants, this study distinguishes between the terms PA, exercise (intervention), and physical fitness that are all distinct concepts. However, these concepts (terms) are often used interchangeably. In line with a seminal paper, we deem exercise as “a subset of PA that is planned, structured, and repetitive and has as a final or an intermediate objective the improvement or maintenance of physical fitness”. In addition, physical fitness is deemed “a set of attributes that are either health- or skill-related” [10].

Pregnant women tend to demonstrate a lack of knowledge regarding PA during pregnancy [9, 11, 12]. The reasons for insufficient knowledge include but are not limited to the mothers’ race [13], socio-economic and cultural context [14], and maternal education [15]. Relatively low degree of pregnant women report that they had received prescription in terms of exercise interventions from health providers during pregnancy [16]. In addition, past research identified an important barrier to enhancing pregnant women’ knowledge about PA—the absence of PA-related domains in the development of professional healthcare professionals [17]. Due to lack of guidance, pregnant women access information about healthy lifestyle during pregnancy via the internet with questionable credibility [18, 19].

Mottola et al. who performed a literature review and identified some benefits of prenatal PA, provided preliminary guidance for pregnant women and healthcare professionals on prenatal PAity [20]. Unsurprisingly, the women who were given guidelines for PA during pregnancy reported exercising [21].

In addition to potential issues with credible sources of information and lack of novel guidance, healthcare professionals need multiple sources to develop an “integrative approach” for promotion of PA to pregnant women [22, 23]. From the standpoint of the authors,an “integrative approach” should, for instance, account for tailored exercise interventions that could be useful to pregnant women with specific goald, and facilitate the adherence of pregnant women to PA [24, 25].

The aim of the current study is hence two-fold. First, we respond to more-recent calls for evidence-based recommendations that would enhance promotion of PA during pregnancy (see e.g., [26]). We have listed and contextualized the recommendations to be provided to pregnant women, professional healthcare professionals involved in nursing (e.g., midwives), and wider society. Further, by identifying exercise modalities, examining characteristics of exercise interventions with a systematic review, and corresponding health outcomes we address a recent call from DiPietro et al. [27] to advance current knowledge and empower healthcare professionals. As interventions should be tailored (e.g., goal-oriented to a physical-fitness components), our second aim is to characterize the interventions from main findings, and further elaborate characteristics such as exercise modality. By corroborating the exercise interventions for pregnant women, we can enhance the adherence to PA and improve the promotion of PA among the healthcare professionals. Ultimately, the current study concludes with the contributions to the learning system and an identification of intricate contemporary challenges to be addressed in the future research.



A systematic review is a summary of the medical literature that uses explicit and reproducible methods to systematically search, critically appraise, and synthesize a specific health issue [28]. Following steps were taken into account when performing a systematic review: (1) defining research question; (2) preliminary literature search; (3) development of search string, inclusion and exclusion criteria; (4) literature search and analysis; (5) literature synthesis; (6) assessment of literature quality and bias; and (7) interpretation of findings and proposition of future directions. When performing a systematic review, the Additional file 1: PRISMA guidelines were followed [25] (Additional file 1: Appendix 1).

Search methods

For the development of research question, a Population, Intervention and Outcome—PICO [29] format was used. The research question was: How do exercise interventions improve the health of physically-active pregnant women and their infants? Exclusion and inclusion criteria were developed based on the preliminary literature search and PICO research question (Table 1).

Table 1 Search criteria and inclusion and exclusion criteria

We searched for literature published between June 2017 and June 2022, in English language and RCTs. As described by Hiebl [30], authors can limit their literature search by publication time. However, reasons should be justified and mentioned in the limitation section. The aim of this systematic review is to get the newest and best evidence in this field, thus, only literature published in last five years were examined. We provide up-to-date evidence which is often neglected by authors of overviews [31]. We included only RCTs because they are assessed as the most credible in the hierarchy of evidence [23]. Other studies were excluded (Additional file 1).

A search string was developed based on preliminary literature search and was taken into account in the process of literature search (Table 2).

Table 2 Search results

Search outcomes

Using the developed search string 2092 records were identified in four databases. After duplicates exclusion, literature was checked by title and abstract; 26 articles were retrieved and checked by the full text. Finally, 20 articles were included in the final analysis and synthesis. Steps of literature search are presented in Fig. 1 [32].

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram

Quality appraisal

The data quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system [33, 34]. GRADE identified its five categories—study limitations, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and publication bias. GRADE quality level is interpreted as high (++++), moderate (+++), low (++), or very low (+).

Data extraction

Data were extracted using standardized data form in Microsoft Excel® by two reviewers. The first reviewer exported data and second reviewer checked for data accuracy. The literature screening was carried out independently by two researchers. Disagreements were solved by consensus. We extracted study characteristics such as study sample, exercise intervention, main study results and conclusions.

Data synthesis

A narrative synthesis was conducted for all included studies. Results were synthesized by PA modality and intensity or duration of PA. Also, results were synthesised due to the intervention effectiveness.


In total, 20 articles were included in the final analysis (Table 3). Studies which fit the inclusion criteria were analysed due to sample, intervention, results and conclusions. Excluded studies are listed in the Additional file 2: Appendix 2.

Table 3 Study characteristics

Studies included in the analyses involved various number of participants. Those numbers varied between minimum of 20 [27] and maximum of 1023 pregnant women [38]. All studies had intervention and control group. However, all studies did not report mean and standard deviation for each group. Interventions were the following: moderate aerobic exercise, lumbar stabilization and stretching exercise, resistance training, water exercise, various moderate-intensity exercises, physical conditioning program, cycling program, nerve and tendon-slip exercise, and individual or group sessions with a personal trainer. Studies outcomes are assessed as positive or negative for pregnant women or infant in the Table 4. Details about each intervention are provided in the Table 5. In the remainder of this study the observed studies are assessed for quality using the GRADE system (table in Additional file 3: Appendix 3). All studies included were RCTs because of the search criteria. RCTs are seen as a high-quality body-of-knowledge [34]. When assessing quality of each evidence, study design, study limitations, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision and risk of bias were considered. The results of the assessment are as follows. Among 18 units-of-analysis, three were assessed as moderate quality, eight as low quality, and seven as very low quality. In these seven, quality scored was lower due to numerous limitations (e.g., the absence of the control group, small study sample, lack of blinding, lack of robust analyses, etc.), higher deviations in CIs for interventions, or risk of bias.

Table 4 Data synthesis by intervention and results
Table 5 An in-merge of evidence-based exercise interventions by the exercise modality

Out of 20 identified RCTs, 11 (55.00%) reported positive results of implemented intervention on maternal or infant health outcomes (Table 4). Others showed no changes or did not report the result.

To help professional healthcare professionals in promoting PA we further categorize interventions by exercise modality (Table 5). Among a range of exercise modalities, four exercise modalities, namely strengthening, stretching, balance, and aerobic exercises, are commonly found in the existing body of literature that focuses on positive results of physical activity interventions on health outcomes [52,53,54,55].

Table 5 categorizes main findings with respect to exercise modality and their expected positive results on pregnant-women health and well-being. The favourable health outcomes of performing moderate aerobic exercise were most extensively examined [35, 45], followed by strengthening see e.g., [42], or a hybrid form using both [38, 44]. For aerobic exercise, treadmill, walking, and other aerobic-exercise programs are advised (see Table 5). A more comprehensive hybrid form of PA program included moderate aerobic exercise with gradual warm-up; aerobics; light muscle strengthening; balance; stretching; strengthening; and relaxation with final talk [35]. In addition, [56] proposed an exercise program of both aerobic and strength training among Norwegian pregnant women to examine vitamin-D mediated effect on maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Some of the remaining studies also focused on specific sub-types of, for instance, stretching [36], and aerobic exercise [47]. In fact, practitioners are advised to suggest pregnant women the tendon slip exercises and the nerve-gliding exercises. Gestational diabetes mellitus was the main research subject by [4]. Authors revealed that, complementary to healthy eating, exercise limits the gestational weight gain. What is more, their findings pinpoint to a comprehensive approach, comprised of, for instance, moderate PA, reducing sedentary time, and strengthening.

Fontana Carvalho et al. [36] reported that involved pregnant women were included in either lumbal stabilization exercise group or lower limb and trunk stretching exercise group. Both interventions showed positive results in pain reduction caused by or perceived as a result of pregnancy. Rodríguez-Blanque et al. [38] reported that pregnant women performed a moderate PA consisting of a warm-up; aerobic exercise, strengthening, and stretching with relaxation to limit the negative effects on the body and to optimise well-being, mood and sleep patterns. Finally, positive results were also seen by combing individual diet and PA [39]. Moreover, PA intervention entailed positive results in maternal diet quality. Similarly, [40] proposed a supervised PA program consisting of warm-up, aerobic exercise, strengthening, balance, and stretching with relaxation. Hereby, intensity of PA was mild-to-moderate. The PA showed positive results in weight loss at 6 weeks post-partum.

Among the combined exercise modalities, [35] introduced a 10-min warm-up (walking and stretching) with a main section that lasted 30–35 min and included moderate intensity aerobic and resistance exercises. Activity ended with a cool down (walking, stretching, relaxation and pelvic floor muscle training). Gustafsson et al. [45] proposed a 12-week standardized PA program where women were encouraged to perform exercise modalities at home at least twice a week. Fontana Carvalho et al. [36] reported success of exercise interventions with a combination of stabilization of lower limbs and stretching. With an aim of reducing carpal-tunnel symptoms, pregnant women also conducted tailored nerve and tendon slip exercises on daily basis [41]. With respect to duration, [44] suggested water exercise to be followed for 12 weeks. Finally, a PA program aimed at conditioning was developed to encourage pregnant women to perform exercises throughout the entire pregnancy [40].


Our findings reveal that past research on PA in pregnancy focused mostly on health outcomes for the pregnant women and infants. Similar to Evenson et al. (2014), our analysis revealed heterogeneity of findings in terms of exercise modality, duration, and intensity. To overcome some of these shortcomings, we call for a standardization in terms of measurable and comparative characteristics of PA in pregnancy. Following this train-of-thought, a commonly used FITT framework (see e.g., [57]) has been applied to numerous sub-domains where exercise prescriptions from the healthcare professionals play a significant role, ranging from patients with cancer [58], exercise prescriptions for cardiometabolic health [59], and occasionally as a one-size-fits-all to general population [60].

Applying a framework similar to FITT to pregnant women would allow for quantifying the common characteristics of PA in pregnancy (e.g., intensity). The development of such framework that would guide the hands-on recommendations from the healthcare professionals would require acknowledging for any challenges pregnant women might have as a result of, for instance, deteriorating health, lack of physical fit, and maturity of pregnancy [61, 62]. Finally, a growing number of pregnant women have a propensity to remain physically fit notwithstanding pregnancy. Physical fitness is defined as a»state characterized by: (a) an ability to perform daily activities with vigour; and (b) demonstration of traits and capacities that are associated with low risk of premature development of physical inactivity [63]. In a broader sense, one’s physical fitness represents their capability to carry out a range of exercise modalities and daily tasks. Campbell et al. [64] emphasize the need to improve this capability concomitantly with the management any fatigue, stress, or change in health condition which is especially relevant assertion to the pregnant women. Moreover, there is a need for development of efficient physical activity interventions for pregnant women. Marini et al. [65] proposed a study protocol to design physical activity intervention for pregnant women to include in childbirth preparation classes evaluating its feasibility and efficacy on quality of life, PA levels and other outcomes.

The physical fitness is achieved, maintained and facilitated by prescribing exercise that accounts for the components of physical fitness. These components might differ with respect to the existing literature; however, most commonly the components are cardiorespiratory fitness [66], muscular strength [67], muscular endurance [68], body composition [69], and flexibility [55, 70]. Elaborating on the physical-fitness components could reveal complementary outcomes (in addition to health outcomes identified by the current study and past research) relevant to pregnant women that aim to advance their PA. We suggest the future research to focus on further examination of the complementary role of maintaining physical fitness, to account for the associated health- and physical-fitness-related outcomes, and to overcome aforementioned context-based challenges for pregnant women (e.g., timing of PA).

The existing learning system in nursing can advance by moving towards an integrative approach that accounts for multiple sources, network collaboration, and continuous investigation of PA. We facilitate the learning processes of healthcare professionals by elaborating on exercise modalities, and commencing a discussion over the components of physical fitness. Acknowledging physical-fitness components could enhance adherence of pregnant women to PA (see e.g., [39]), and empower healthcare professionals who promote PA.

It is evident that research does not focus on different components of PA or components of physical fitness. In line with DiPietro et al. [27] we argue that the future research should focus on providing recommendations tailored for the »peri-pregnancy« period, i.e. before, during, and after a childbirth. Second; whilst the current study adds to tailoring exercise interventions by elaborating exercise modality and physical-fitness components, lack of detailed information not only about pregnant women but also about the pre-pregnancy condition prevents from optimizing interventions for particular cohorts of pregnant women.

Future research should focus on multiple sources to overcome aforementioned challenges that limit the development of tailored evidence-based PA recommendations. Furthermore, we suggest that, in addition to health outcomes, the future research devotes more attention to the role and plausibility of PA for achieving or maintaining physical-fitness components of pregnant women. Such enriched guidelines could enhance adherence and favourable health outcomes of pregnant women, and improve promotion of PA among the healthcare professionals. However, future research should identify appropriate healthcare professionals to distribute PA recommendations (see e.g., [23]), and, in addition, barriers that prevent from effective distribution of physical activity recommendations. Finally, to complement the existing body of the literature with PA recommendations for pregnant women, future research should ensure the scientific nature of such reviews by e.g., addressing the listed limitations, and expanding the data obtained.

The current study reveals a lack of context-dependency, for instance characteristics of pregnant women such as age, previous PA levels, comorbidities, other measures (e.g., BMI), mental well-being, pregnancy status (e.g., early or late pregnancy, health issues during pregnancy, micronutrient levels etc.), non-communicable diseases with viral infections (see e.g., [71, 72]), and other factors such as personal attitude (see e.g., [73]) that could compromise the development and realization of PA. However, the current study also has some methodological limitations in addition to the limited feasibility of data analysis. First, we deliberately examined the more-recent literature in order to get novel and credible selection of evidence. We omitted analysing non-published papers or papers without a free access. Second, a heterogeneity of findings partially prevented from more thorough analyses. Finally, we did not use data processing software, which to some degree reduces the reliability of the qualitative analysis.

Conclusion with research agenda

The current study demonstrates numerous favourable health outcomes of PA during pregnancy. Recommendations given by practitioners to pregnant women focus on preforming at least 150 min per week moderate-intensity aerobic PA. However, further explanations are not provided. That being said, practitioners can use our systematic literature review to examine favourable maternal and infant health outcomes with a range of exercise modalities (strengthening, balance, stretching, and exercise modalities combined) in addition to aerobic exercise. Furthermore, the practitioners can learn from the current study about the importance of physical-fitness components. As adherence is consistently deemed a critical success factor for PA [74], accounting for the physical-fitness components, i.e., goal-oriented (tailored), in exercise interventions, could remarkably improve the adherence of pregnant women to PA.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Body mass index


Gestational diabetes mellitus


The grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation system


Number of participants


Oral glucose tolerance test


p value of statistical significance


Physical activity


Population, intervention and outcome


Randomised controlled trial


Study of water exercise during pregnancy


  1. World Health Organization. What does “physical activity” mean? Geneva: WHO; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burnett CWF. Value of prenatal exercises. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1956;40:40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simmons D, et al. Effect of physical activity and/or healthy eating on GDM risk: the DALI lifestyle study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;3:903–13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broekhuizen K, et al. Cost-effectiveness of healthy eating and/or physical activity promotion in pregnant women at increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: economic evaluation alongside the DALI study, a European multicenter randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;1:23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mizgier M, et al. The impact of physical activity during pregnancy on maternal weight and obstetric outcomes. Ginekol Pol. 2018;89:80–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kołomańska D, Zarawski M, Mazur-Bialy A. Physical activity and depressive disorders in pregnant women—a systematic review. Medicina. 2019;5:212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shakeel N, et al. Physical activity in pregnancy and postpartum depressive symptoms in a multiethnic cohort. J Affect Disord. 2018;236:93–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun W, et al. Physical activity and body image dissatisfaction among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;229:38–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Santo EC, et al. Determinants of physical activity frequency and provider advice during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:126–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Grenier LN, et al. Be healthy in pregnancy: exploring factors that impact pregnant women’s nutrition and exercise behaviours. Matern Child Nutr. 2020;17:e13068.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitaker KM, et al. African American and White women׳s perceptions of weight gain, physical activity, and nutrition during pregnancy. Midwifey. 2016;34:211–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. da Silva GS, et al. A randomized controlled trial of exercise during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes: results from the PAMELA study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;1:175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Brien OA, et al. Influences on the food choices and physical activity behaviours of overweight and obese pregnant women: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2017;47:28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Akbari A, et al. Assessing of physical activity self-efficacy and knowledge about benefits and safety during pregnancy among women. RJMS. 2016;22:76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rodrigues Domingues M, Barros AJD. Leisure-time physical activity during pregnancy in the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study. Rev Saúde Pública. 2007;41:173–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hopkinson Y, et al. Midwives understanding of physical activity guidelines during pregnancy. Midwifery. 2018;59:23–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cannon S, et al. A review of pregnancy information on nutrition, physical activity and sleep websites. Women Birth. 2020;33:35–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murray DM, Fisher JD. The internet: a virtually untapped tool for research. J Technol Hum Serv. 2022;19:5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mottola MF, Davenport MH, Ruchat SM, Davies GA, Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Jaramillo Garcia A, Barrowman N, Adamo KB, Duggan M, Barakat R, Chilibeck P, Fleming K, Forte M, Korolnek J, Nagpal T, Slater LG, Stirling D, Zehr L. 2019 Canadian guideline for physical activity throughout pregnancy. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:1339–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. May LE, et al. Exercise during pregnancy: the role of obstetric providers. J Osteopath Med. 2013;113:612–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamilton K, et al. Being active in pregnancy: theory-based factors associated with physical activity among pregnant women. Women Health. 2019;2:213–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Vivo M, Mills H. “They turn to you first for everything”: insights into midwives’ perspectives of providing physical activity advice and guidance to pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;1:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Evenson KR, Mottola MF, Artal R. Review of recent physical activity guidelines during pregnancy to facilitate advice by health care providers. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2019;8:481–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lindqvist M, Persson M, Mogren I. “Longing for individual recognition”–pregnant women’s experiences of midwives’ counselling on physical activity during pregnancy. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018;1:46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lindqvist M, Persson M, Mogren I. “Longing for individual recognition”–pregnant women’s experiences of midwives’ counselling on physical activity during pregnancy. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018;15:46–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. DiPietro L, Evenson KR, Bloodgood B, Sprow K, Troiano RP, Piercy KL, Vaux-Bjerke A, Powell KE. Benefits of physical activity during pregnancy and postpartum: an umbrella review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51:1292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2013;1:9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schardt C, et al. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hiebl MRW. Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organ Res Methods. 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pieper D, Antoine SL, Neugebauer EA, Eikermann M. Up-to-dateness of reviews is often neglected in overviews: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:1302–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Andrews JC, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:726–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Balshem H, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Barakat R, et al. Exercise during pregnancy has a preventative effect on excessive maternal weight gain and gestational diabetes. A randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2019;23:148–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fontana Carvalho AP, et al. Effects of lumbar stabilization and muscular stretching on pain, disabilities, postural control and muscle activation in pregnant woman with low back pain. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;3:297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  37. de Vargas Nunes Coll C, et al. Efficacy of regular exercise during pregnancy on the prevention of postpartum depression: the PAMELA randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;1:e186861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rodríguez-Blanque R, et al. Water exercise and quality of life in pregnancy: a randomised clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;4:1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dodd JM, Deussen AE, Louise J. A randomised trial to optimise gestational weight gain and improve maternal and infant health outcomes through antenatal dietary, lifestyle and exercise advice: the OPTIMISE randomised trial. Nutrients. 2019;12:2911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brik M, et al. Does exercise during pregnancy impact on maternal weight gain and fetal cardiac function? A randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;5:583–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Keskin Y, et al. Effectiveness of home exercise in pregnant women with carpal tunnel syndrome: randomized control trial. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;2:202–7.

    Google Scholar 

  42. OʼConnor PJ, et al. Effects of resistance training on fatigue-related domains of quality of life and mood during pregnancy: a randomized trial in pregnant women with increased risk of back pain. Psychosom Med. 2018;3:327–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Krohn Garnæs K, et al. Effects of supervised exercise training during pregnancy on psychological well-being among overweight and obese women: secondary analyses of the ETIP-trial, a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019;11:e028252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Backhausen MG, et al. The effects of an unsupervised water exercise program on low back pain and sick leave among healthy pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2017;9:e0182114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Gustafsson MK, et al. The effect of an exercise program in pregnancy on vitamin D status among healthy, pregnant Norwegian women: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;1:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Atkinson SA, et al. Be Healthy in Pregnancy (BHIP): a randomized controlled trial of nutrition and exercise intervention from early pregnancy to achieve recommended gestational weight gain. Nutrients. 2022;14:810.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. de Andrade Leão OA, Domingues MR, Bertoldi AD, Ricardo LIC, de Andrade Müller W, Tornquist L, Martins RC, Murray J, Silveira MF, Crochemore-Silva I, Hallal PC, Mielke GI. Effects of regular exercise during pregnancy on early childhood neurodevelopment: the physical activity for mothers enrolled in longitudinal analysis randomized controlled trial. J Phys Act Health. 2022;19:203–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gonzalez-Plaza E, Bellart J, Arranz Á, Luján-Barroso L, Mirasol EC, Seguranyes G. Effectiveness of a step counter smartband and midwife counseling intervention on gestational weight gain and physical activity in pregnant women with obesity (Pas and Pes study): randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10:e28886.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Talebi E, Mohaddesi H, Vahabzadeh D, et al. Examination of influence of social media education through mobile phones on the change in physical activity and sedentary behavior in pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22:152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Sandborg J. HealthyMoms : a smartphone application to promote healthy weight gain, diet and physical activity during pregnancy : a randomized controlled trial. Huddinge: s.l.: Karolinska Institutet; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Niaraki MR, Pakniat H, Alizadeh A, Hosseini MA, Ranjkesh F. Effect of exercise in water on the musculoskeletal pain in pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. J Musculoskelet Res. 2021;24:2150003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hayden JA, et al. Some types of exercise are more effective than others in people with chronic low back pain: a network meta-analysis. J Physiother. 2021;67:252–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Shimada IS, et al. Effects of exercise therapy on painful temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:475–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Murphy SE, et al. Influence of exercise type on maternal blood pressure adaptation throughout pregnancy. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022;2:100023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Haskell WL, Montoye HJ, Orenstein D. Physical activity and exercise to achieve health-related physical fitness components. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:202.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Embaby H, Elsayed E, Fawzy M. Insulin sensitivity and plasma glucose response to aerobic exercise in pregnant women at risk for gestational diabetes mellitus. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016;5:409–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Flynn AC, Seed PT, Patel N, Barr S, Bell R, Briley AL, Godfrey KM, Nelson SM, Oteng-Ntim E, Robinson SM, Sanders TA, Sattar N, Wardle J, Poston L, Goff LM, UPBEAT consortium. Dietary patterns in obese pregnant women; influence of a behavioral intervention of diet and physical activity in the UPBEAT randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13:124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Kirkham AA, et al. Exercise prescription and adherence for breast cancer: one size does not FITT all. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:177–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Reid RER, Thivel D, Mathieu M-E. Understanding the potential contribution of a third “T” to FITT exercise prescription: the case of timing in exercise for obesity and cardiometabolic management in children. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019;44:911–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Burnet K, et al. How fitting is FIIT? A perspective on a transition from the sole use if frequency, intensity, time, and type in exercise prescription. Psychol Behav. 2019;199:33–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Malta MB, et al. Educational intervention regarding diet and physical activity for pregnant women: changes in knowledge and practices among health professionals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. De Vivo M, Mills H. Laying the foundation for pregnancy physical activity profiling: a framework for providing tailored physical activity advice and guidance to pregnant women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:5996.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Pate RR. The evolving definition of physical fitness. Quest. 1988;40:147–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Campbell N, De Jesus S, Prapavessis H. Physical fitness. In: Gellman ME, Turner JR, editors. Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 95–136.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Marini S, et al. Co-design and evaluation of the feasibility and the efficacy of a multiple-targeted adapted physical activity intervention to promote quality of life, well-being and physical activity levels in pregnant women: the “WELL-DONE!” study protocol. Sustainability. 2021;13:12285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Marín-Jiménez N, et al. Association of self-reported physical fitness with pain during pregnancy: the GESTAFIT project. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019;29:1022–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. O’Connor PJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of supervised strength training adopted in pregnancy. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8:309–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. White E, Pivarnik J, Pfeiffer K. Resistance training during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11:1141–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Henriksson P, et al. Associations of body composition and physical fitness with gestational diabetes and cardiovascular health in pregnancy: results from the HealthyMoms trial. Nutr Diabetes. 2021;11:16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Figueira HA, et al. Pregnancy-related low back pain relief after maximum static flexibility program. Health. 2014;6:2966–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zovko V, Budler M. Sitting ducks: physical activity and diet-related interventions in the" peri-COVID-19" period. Kinesiol Slov. 2021;27:52–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Sitzberger C, et al. Physical activity in high-risk pregnancies. J Clin Med. 2022;3:703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hamilton K, et al. Being active in pregnancy: theory-based factors associated with physical activity among pregnant women. Women Health. 2019;2:213–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Room J, et al. What interventions are used to improve exercise adherence in older people and what behavioural techniques are they based on? A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017;12:e019221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



LCB and MB were involved in the study conceptualization and design of the systematic review. LCB and MB were responsible for generating the systematic review terms, performing the systematic searches, extracting the data, analysing the data, performing the data synthesis, and for creating the study, tables and figures. Both authors have read and approved the final study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leona Cilar Budler.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Appendix 1.

Additional file 2.

Appendix 2.

Additional file 3.

Appendix 3.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cilar Budler, L., Budler, M. Physical activity during pregnancy: a systematic review for the assessment of current evidence with future recommendations. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 14, 133 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: